What the Shadow of Marcos is used to Conceal

Imelda Marcos was in the news a while back for getting another conviction (she had been convicted years ago, though there seems to be a roadblock to carrying it out). Some people are celebrated this (even pro-Marcoses who believe Imelda was the reason behind all the corruption, not Ferdinand). Some though are angered that she was allowed to post bail, and that the police are slow to arrest her and are even making comparisons to poorer older people who have murdered or such. Really, don’t get ahead of yourselves.

shadow of marcos scapegoat

This also raises one interesting observation about the “opposition” (the Yellowtards): they want us to believe that everything that’s wrong with the Philippines started with him – and only with him. So corruption started only in his time, they claim, and so all bad Filipinos learned from him. Every February 25, this is the narrative that they continue to push on us.

So we ignore that back during the Revolution against the Spanish, there was lots of backbiting that led to Antonio Luna and Andres Bonifacio being killed (it doesn’t matter whether Emilio Aguinaldo was responsible; Filipinos were still the ones who pulled the triggers). So we ignore that during World War 2, guerilla fighters were also squabbling against each other and claiming turfs that even fellow Filipino guerillas should not enter. Never mind that Filipinos have been warring against, using, enslaving and defrauding each other, even before the Spanish came. I call bunk the idea that corruption started in Marcos’ time. Whatever has been ailing our country has been around ever since people have been on these islands, as what Ambeth Ocampo highlighted from the memoir of Spanish explorer Miguel Lopez de Legazpi.

Let me digress a bit to make another point related to this. If people say the first massacres after World War 2 started in Marcos’ time, that’s false. The first one was the Maliwalu massacre in 1951 (at around the same time was the political killing of Moises Padilla). It was not ordered by government officials. The soldiers themselves decided to kill some farmers for revenge, suspecting they were Hukbalahap members, as one of the soldiers’ comrades was killed by the Huks. They were loose cannons who just wanted blood. This is likely what happened during martial law as well, and is happening in society today. Lots of military personnel (even ordinary citizens) likely had beefs with some people, or even just wanted to power-trip over others, whether offended by them or not, and so they kidnapped, tortured and killed them. Don’t forget that even communist and Islamic insurgents are also guilty of murdering and abusing lots of innocents. Marcos’ time was never the origin of our ills.

Dictators have usually been described with “power vested in one man.” I now realize how ridiculous it is. This description of dictatorships implies that the single man, let’s say Marcos, himself committed the atrocities. As if he stepped out of Malacanang and went on to kill people himself. The truth is, there were other people, that we can call goons, who made their own plans and carried out the killings themselves, since dictatorships are a group effort. That’s why Ilda pointed to Enrile and Ramos. They were in charge of the military and police that time. Same goes for the lower-ranked people who actually carried out the killings. But just because they went balimbing, people were willing to give them a free pass and wanted to just dump it all on Marcos. That’s where the dumbness started.

Many people who are in corruption controversies today were not oligarchs or people related to famous names. If you give guns and gold to ordinary people, they can turn into goons or get some of their own. They can have businesses that they run unethically and some become the politicians or politicians’ staff members we’ve never heard about, but are reportedly pocketing public money. Even showbiz personalities have learned to squeeze into lucrative positions and commit abuses. Some even pretend to be anti-corruption or ride on the Anti-Marcos bandwagon, when all the time they’re part of what they profess to be against. Evil thrives not because good men do nothing; it thrives because it pretends to be good, and there are suckers for that pretension.

The clamor and noise barrages against the “shadow of Marcos” can be distractions from these true powers-that-be. They are trying to take people’s attention off those with greater signs of being in corruption and are still pretending to be the goody-two-shoes types. Among them, Andy Bautista and Antonio Trillanes.

Speaking of loose cannons: that’s one of the reasons why many people these days are favoring the Marcos name again. It is not “historical revisionism” or propaganda. In Floyd Whaley’s article about the “Marcos golden era,” an interviewee talks about how people were seen as disciplined in those days, while today, there is so much lack of discipline. These is the legitimate experience of older people; even Fr. Ranhilio Aquino says the general feeling at the time was that there was order. It seems to me that of all the administrations that the Philippines had between Marcos and Duterte never really focused on discipline. People want someone who will impose discipline on the loose cannons in Philippine society, and Duterte was seen as the logical choice.

Unless we accept that the loose cannons of society are prevalent even in the grassroots, we are unlikely to resolve all our crises. All the road rage, scams, kangaroo courts, murderousness and more are from our ordinary culture as Filipinos. We need to make our grassroots culture shape up, develop more discipline, take care of the loose cannons and perhaps kill all the parts of this culture that we love but are pulling us down. Because if we don’t, we remain a dysfunctional sick man of Asia.

print

About ChinoF

I stick with this blog because I believe, as my cohorts do, that many things Filipino embrace as part of their culture are pulling them down. And I blog freely to show that in a truly decent society, with true freedom of speech, even nobodies have a voice.

12 Comments on “What the Shadow of Marcos is used to Conceal”

  1. The late Pres. Marcos Sr. and his Martial Law , are good “bogeyman”, to use for the stupid and dysfunctionally minded Filipinos. They are used as tools, by the Aquinos, the Cojuangcos, the YellowTards, the Political Opportunists, and all kinds of crooks and scammers in our country.

    Unless, we the Filipino people will “wake up”, from this stupid way to frighten us with the “Marcos Sr. Bogeymen”; these crooks and scammers will use them, as diversions ;while they steal and scam our taxes and get away with it . The DAP, PDAF, Typhoon Yolanda missing fund, drug shabu problems, etc are good examples !

  2. “What the Shadow of Marcos is used to Conceal”
    Let’s put it this way, the present society have a ground rules and these are: 1. Be not a burden! 2. Be independent! 3. Be practical! 4. Be counted(useful) 5. Be educated!, but the problem is, only a few knows about these ground rules, instead, the ordinary people are told to believe and follow principles in the form of moral value that only a transcendental being(not human) can possibly uphold, this moral value is based on the idea of hero-martyr-saint, so no matter how much people try to uphold the moral principle it will reach a point where integrity breaks down and then end in corruption, and always you will hear this justification “I’m only human”.

    The question is, has anyone out there never applied or use the five principles mentioned above, if there’s nothing wrong with those principles or ground rules, isn’t it about time that they should be revealed formally to the people, why hide(conceal) them with hypocrisy.

    “We need to make our grassroots culture shape up, develop more discipline, take care of the loose cannons and perhaps kill all the parts of this culture that we love but are pulling us down. Because if we don’t, we remain a dysfunctional sick man of Asia.”

  3. It really annoys me that with the MSM (mainstream media) still wants to tell us that tainted surnames should be blamed for the country’s mess.

    That’s why Filipinos should learn objective history. If they keep on saying the Marcos years were all bad and did nothing constructive about it yet rejoice the 1987 Constitution and Cory’s efforts like a breath of fresh air, it’s the same douches who thought that the Spaniards finally leaving is a time of grace for the country. Yes, it is a time of grace only for the Aquinos, Cojuangcos who established their political dynasties in centuries on end. It’s because Pinoys is fixated only on events and never looked on the context with these events and how it can affect them as a whole.

  4. Political perceptions can now actually be measured, so we can do away with their fluff! And surely there are other applications. There’s already too much speculation peddled by the usual factions and their media. They’re not going to change their tone as long as the same influence are behind them.
    Btw Fr. Rhanilio Aquino has some really good articles…

  5. If the allegations of corruption were to be consistent, the accused could’ve just easily bought the media than deal with the incessant harrassment. But then the “free press” wouldn’t discuss that. It’s more convenient to be dictated upon by your owners.

  6. I hate the “Shame and Guilt” and “Scapegoating” when talking about politics and history, there’s little sincerity when one side uses it to get concessions and moralize that he’s an upstanding individual, nor do I like making another person bow because what his forefathers did, if that were to happen, then everyone of us should apologize and hang our heads in shame, because we were at one time a descendant of a murderer. Sins of the father, no one should be made to feel guilty of things that happened a long time ago that he never was involved with.

    1. Yes, that’s one cultural thing that should be dropped. Punishing the children for the father’s sins. Or punishing Pedro for the crimes of Juan. Sadly, we still have a lot of that in Philippine society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.