From Corona to GMA: The Philippine Hate-Bandwagon

We have witnessed in the past months how ex-Chief Justice Renato Corona received the lion’s share of jeers and insults from the Filipino populace in the duration of his impeachment trial. He was accused of a whole bunch of crimes, the most memorable of which is betrayal of public trust, judging by inaccuracies in his Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net worth (SALN). At the moment when the respondent himself faced the Senate court to address his case, Corona couldn’t help but become sentimental regarding the possibly permanent moral damage inflicted upon him and his family by the Filipino people. He expressed his sadness over how people judge him because of his investments, accusing him of being a “thief,” earning him the moniker “Thief Justice” from wannabe satirists from the masses.

In the end, the nation’s wishes were fulfilled as Corona got convicted and ousted from office. But looking back to the debates that ensued concerning Corona’s moral and legal standing, how did most Filipinos voice out their reasons for condemning Corona? Perhaps you might remember memorable quotes like these:

“Tuta kasi siya ni Arroyo.” (He’s Arroyo’s lapdog.)

“Midnight appointee ni Arroyo.” (He’s Arroyo’s midnight appointee.)

“Marami kasi siyang pera na undeclared, kaya guilty siya at dapat umalis sa pwesto.” (He has a lot of undeclared wealth, so he’s guilty and should be removed from office.)

There is a myriad of attempts to justify Filipinos’ contempt for the ex-Chief Justice, most of which, if not all, have been said again and again, rehashed again and again—with passion. But rarely, if not never, had we seen an actual good argument or position to suspect Corona of betrayal of public trust. If anything, anti-Corona peeps will churn out the old and tiresome rhetoric about Corona being Arroyo’s midnight appointee and whatnot, even though most of them are either lacking in proof, or already debunked.

What’s worse is that some people will just argue based from what they had heard from other people, or from the prosecution panel that combated the Chief Justice (a really terrible source of information). And this is often the case; in the course of Corona’s impeachment, many Filipinos formed their opinions primarily out of what they’ve heard and agreed with it almost instantaneously. It makes you think that, somehow, they must have hated him simply because almost everyone does.

But there is a hate-game that has been around far longer than the one about Corona. This one is very much alive despite the years that have passed, because apparently, people are still hungry for justice. I’m not sure whether there are Filipinos who actually don’t know this, but I am, of course, talking about the intense Filipino hatred towards former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.

Oh, just hearing that name will piss many Filipinos off already. Some of them might even say something like “the most corrupt president in the world,” “go to hell, you b*tch,” “I hope she rots in jail,” among others. It would seem that GMA-hate has been deeply ingrained in the lifestyle of Filipinos that it is considered a norm; a standard of living. You’re a Filipino if you hate GMA. Something like that.

And what could aggravate the typical Filipino lifestyle more than this recent event; GMA is now free on bail, thanks to Pasay Regional Trial Court Judge Jesus Mupas. We all sort of expected that after what happened to Corona, GMA’s public persecution is just around the corner, but I admit that I didn’t expect things to turn out this way. This is just too much of a slap in the face of those Filipinos who live the GMA-hate life.

To be succinct, many Filipinos were outraged at this news. The air was filled with shouts calling for GMA’s proverbial head on a pike. Some protesters even attempted to stop GMA as she left the Veterans Memorial Medical Center (VMMC) after her bail was granted.

Angry protesters tried but failed to stop former President and now Pampanga Representative Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo from going home Wednesday afternoon after she posted bail.

(Source: Link)

Wow, talk about angry. Now, one might wonder how people grew to hate her so much to the point of resorting to these kinds of gimmick—stopping a sick old woman from leaving. And then the generic list of GMA’s crimes will be cited once more.

Plunder in the NBN-ZTE anomalous deal

Plunder in the illegal use of PCSO intelligence fund

Plunder in the fertilizer fund scam

Civil suits on human rights violations including extrajudicial killings and torture filed by members of the Morong 43 and the United Church of Christ in the Philippines

Criminal and administrative charges against Arroyo’s henchmen in the military and the police on the account of murder, massacre, kidnapping, illegal arrests, illegal detention, torture and other violation of human rights

Administrative and criminal charges against military, police and other public officials liable in the Hacienda Luisita and Maguindanao massacres

Fraud in the 2004 Elections

(Source: Link)

When you put it that way, GMA really does look contemptible. Since the hottest case filed against her is electoral sabotage, we might as well focus on her alleged crime; fraud in the 2004 elections. Electoral sabotage supposedly is a non-bailable offense. However, a court judge has the discretion to override this rule provided that the evidence supporting the case is too weak. Judge Mupas did just that, and GMA got her bail, much to the chagrin of Filipinos whose lifestyles were deeply shaken by GMA’s temporary release.

Unsurprisingly, President Noynoy Aquino and his cohorts quickly shifted to code red, battle mode, or “let’s volt in” mode (whichever you prefer), and contested Mupas’ ruling, insisting that the evidence against GMA under electoral fraud is not weak.

Commision on Elections (Comelec) Chairman Sixto Brillantes on Thursday said the poll body and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have started preparing their next move against former President Gloria Arroyo, who was released from detention yesterday for her electoral sabotage case.

“Mayroon kaming plano, pag-uusapan namin [ng DOJ]. We just don’t want to give the defense the leeway of knowing what our moves are,” Brillantes told radio dzMM.

Brillantes said he was surprised by Pasay Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 112 Judge Jesus Mupas’ declaration that the evidence against Arroyo was weak, resulting in the granting of Arroyo’s petition for bail.

An electoral sabotage is a non-bailable offense. However, a judge can grant bail if he finds the evidence against the accused of a non-bailable offense weak.

“Eh sabi niyang mahina eh di tatanggapin namin iyan, pero hindi kami naniniwala na mahina ang ebidensya namin. Mayroon pa namang trial on the merits iyan so pwede pa kaming mag-submit ng additional evidence to strengthen the case against the former president,” he said.

(Source: Link)

Furthermore, Brillantes argued that more witnesses have been prepared for the trial, giving the case against GMA merits, followed by a snide remark towards the defense panel which has apparently presented no witnesses so far. This leads me to wonder:

(1) Quality trumps quantity. What is the use of a truckload of witnesses when they fail to shed light on the matter? So far the only testimony frequently considered is that of former Maguindanao Provincial Administrator Norie Unas, which has been deemed as hearsay evidence. Brillantes contested this claim.

He also dismissed the Arroyo camp’s claim that Unas’ testimony that Arroyo masterminded the rigging of the 2007 mid-term elections was hearsay evidence.

“Katabi siya (Unas) ni Gov. Ampatuan nang ibinigay ni GMA ang instruction. Sila ang magkatabi, rinig na rinig niya ang binigay na instruction. Hindi lang niya sinabi na 12-0. Ang sinabi [ni Arroyo ay] kung kailangan palitan ang resulta. Iyun ang masama, ang second portion,” he said.

“Iyun ang ginawa nila eh, nina Unas, Bedol. Iyun ang ibinigay na instructions hanggang sa ibaba eh,” he added.

But this statement did nothing to invalidate the nature of Unas’ testimony as hearsay. Are Brillantes’ claims supported by tangible, visible or audible documents? In effect, what Brillantes did was to confirm the nature of Unas’ testimony as hearsay by saying something structurally similar to what the witness divulged.

(2) Why blame the defense? Who’s trying to prove something anyway? Isn’t it the prosecution, who’s trying to establish GMA’s guilt regarding electoral fraud? Then isn’t it logical to assume that the burden of proof lies on the prosecutors? With that said, what’s the obligation of the defense to present witnesses to counter the prosecution when the latter couldn’t even put up a good fight?

With these said, I have to ask: where’s the merit in all of this?

Meanwhile, the chain of vindictiveness does not end in Comelec, as the Office of the Ombudsman has stepped into the fray to chase GMA ‘til kingdom come.

The Office of the Ombudsman wants Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo rearrested in connection with a plunder case even as the Commission on Elections (Comelec) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) appeal the bail for electoral sabotage that the Pasay City Regional Trial Court granted her on Wednesday.

(Source: Link)

And what else does not end? The mass hatred towards the former president. What’s interesting, however, is if you ask them what their reasons are for hating GMA. Most of them will recite by the list of GMA’s alleged crimes that supposedly makes her an evil person, as if they memorized the said list by rote. Now, how about you ask them this: where is your proof?

“Huh, what proof are you talking about? It’s all around you!”

“What proof are you talking about? It’s not as if GMA is responsible for everything happening right now. After all, PNoy is now the president.”

And then, an awkward moment of silence.

Most Filipinos are so consumed with hatred towards GMA, that they forget an important part in despising someone: justifying it with facts and rational analysis. Every now and then you see a bunch of folks burning a GMA effigy, calling for her punishment, and a bunch of folks reciting the list of her crimes. But where is the proof? Where is the proof that can be validated by the courts that can ensure GMA’s guilt?

Apparently, this is the same question Mupas asked himself. And in an objective decision, by lack of strong material evidence, he decided to grant GMA’s bail petition. EVIL!

Yes, evil, as believed by several protesters who tried to block GMA’s departure. Never mind Article III Section 13 of the Philippine Constitution.

Section 13. All persons, except those charged with offenses punishable by reclusion perpetua when evidence of guilt is strong, shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, or be released on recognizance as may be provided by law. The right to bail shall not be impaired even when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended. Excessive bail shall not be required.

Yes, folks. Bail is a constitutional right. GMA was granted bail by a judge under legal circumstances, and so she has the right to leave. In effect, the protesters are actually attempting to infringe GMA’s rights. What an interesting way of viewing things, eh?

I neither confirm nor deny the allegations against GMA, simply because there is no proof yet. I can’t form a fair and objective judgment in the absence of facts. But apparently, most Filipinos can with clear conscience. That, I believe, is what’s truly evil.

How will you judge someone who hates another person without any firm basis whatsoever? How will you judge someone whose anger is founded not on facts, but merely on hearsay from other people? How will you judge people who judge others in the absence of conclusive evidence? Bad, unfair, maybe evil? Then you’ve just judged the majority of Filipinos who joined the GMA hate-bandwagon.

We Filipinos have this tendency of following trends. Maybe because it’s fun, perhaps it’s for a sense of belonging or something, but this inclination persists in many Filipinos. Moral judgment is no exception, as recent events have shown. Corona was pre-judged through trial by publicity, and was degraded by multitudes of gossipers, eager on destroying his image. GMA was pre-judged for so many years despite weak evidences put up against her, and even became some sort of a cult object for Filipino anger.

Filipinos learned to hate GMA, and later Corona, mostly on the basis of being trendy (like the way how you tweet in accordance to what’s “trending” on Twitter). It’s in to hate GMA, since many people do. It’s in to persecute Corona, since many people do. We might as well join the bandwagon! I see no other explanation; for how can you passionately hate someone for something he or she did, even when there’s no real evidence that confirms that accusation? The way I see it, this can only happen if people are in it for the trend… for the sake of belonging.

In vernacular, nakikisakay lang ang mga Pilipino.

Perhaps, there is some truth in the cases filed against GMA. Perhaps she is indeed guilty of a crime or two. But can we at least be fair enough to suspend our judgment until the hard facts are out? Or is this how Filipinos view justice? Justice based on gossip and hearsay? Justice based on a hate bandwagon on a national scale?

Boy, we sure have a way of messing virtues up.


About Arche

I'm just throwing ideas around. I also love coffee.

Post Author: Arche

I'm just throwing ideas around. I also love coffee.

Leave a Reply

107 Comments on "From Corona to GMA: The Philippine Hate-Bandwagon"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

The Philippines is a country of freedom where the religious are free to hate an individual just because a popular stud says they should.


you just have to read the comments from readers of pro pinoy newspapers to realize how the anti gma put their hatred across without even thinking if what they post have any basis at all. i used to reply to those comments in an effort to straighten out facts but i have given up since realizing that one cannot change the perception of those who blindly take what they read hook line and sinker.



“The Philippines is a country of freedom where the religious are free to hate an individual just because a popular stud says they should.”

So you want us to believe that religious are free to hate an individual just because a popular stud says they should.

I would not contest if you’re correct or not since it’s your opinion. However, I think it’s a guttersnipe for those who are religious.

For being hateful, sad to say, it’s protected by our constitution – freedom of expression. Everybody has the right to hate.

We Filipinos have this tendency of following trends.


He he he…correction. The last line on my comment is not a part of it. It was a part of my comment’s first draft which I was not able to delete.


“We Filipinos have this tendency of following trends.”

Arche, IMO, it can also be attributed to the peer pressure and poor comprehension. I can name a lot of faux intellectus commenters here who really have a poor comprehension to the point that they sunk themselves into defending something that is indefensible.

Lord Chimera

A true leader fosters righteous and justified anger not mob-mentality hatred. Worse this fostering of hatred by Noynoy makes it easy for him to dominate the unthinking masses. This may sound redundant but Hitler used the same hate tactics that enable him to amass power.


I could not help but wonder why noynoy hates gma so much. We always pride ourselves as a nation that respects women. But a president with his bunch of woman haters does not speak well of how balance their manliness and sexual orientation is in dealing with women. What they are doing is the exact opposite of machismo. Noynoy is transforming himself as the consummate psychopathic evil and hater of women.


Some Filipinos are probably so frustrated by continued failures to put away corrupt officials, for example Estrada, so they keep on pressing for GMA to be punished hard just to satisfy this frustration. Even if she’s the only one to be taken out. Maka-isa lang. Puede na yan.

Thing is, even if GMA is jailed, it is no assurance that it is the first step in addressing corruption in the country. If corrupt officials are themselves behind the effort, then you can say the likeliest result is not less corruption, but more.

RF Garcia

a very good analysis arche. However, in some points you seem to suggest that all filipinos hate GMA and Corona. I know you are refering only to the yellow horde which include most of the propagandists in media, Pnoy beneficiaries and the so-called militants. But how many are these people? They are only a fraction of the entire nation. Look at what brainwashing has done. You would think theirs constitute the opinion of the entire Filipino nation but its only because they shout the loudest and appear most frequently on media.

sitting pretty

“I can’t form a fair and objective judgment in the absence of facts. But apparently, most Filipinos can with clear conscience. That, I believe, is what’s truly evil.”

I read this and was stricken by a deep sense of foreboding, because it was in consonance with my own observations.


If I were you guys, I won’t waste my time lecturing a brainless yellow crab. It’s very clear on his statements that he’s just playing on your intellectual skills. He’s a stupid yellow bitch.


Corona NEVER HAD TO EXPLAIN where he came up with $4 million dollars,nor did he get taxed on it,as he should have.DID HE GET it from people he gave favorable rulings to while he was CJ?The flip-flop on PAL surely makes it look like that.Virtually every business deal GMA could be involved in,she was.ITS FUNNY HOW THEY ALWAYS SAY THEY DID NOT STEAL ANY PUBLIC MONEY!!! NO THEY JUST GET KICKBACKS FOR GOVERNMENT BUSINESS CONTRACTS,LIKE ZTE, THAT GETS AWARDED TO CERTAIN PEOPLE WHO SAY ‘THANK YOU’ AHEAD OF TIME.THE SHIT IS CRIMINAL.


And now CGMA’s back in VMMC, cue hellfire from the Yellow Legionnaires.



critical thinking… this is something that’s missing. i won’t pretend that i know everything there is to know about these political figures but then i won’t passionately lambast a human being if i know squat about the facts. the average filipino, however, seem to just jump on the hate bandwagon believing everything they see and hear in ABS-CBN, PDI, Phil Star, PTV4. they can’t tell fact from fiction. i can’t tell fact from fiction either. i’m not an insider. hence, critical thinking.

Der Fuhrer

The psychological effect on the ignorant, gullible, “discerning” mass is similar to the Roman gladiatorial games. They want blood and it is given to them. I pity our people who are either manipulated by propaganda or fanatics of the ruling order.


In a way, Corona and Gloria Arroyo were not hated because the people just decided to hate them. They also contributed to their fate of being the most hated at the time they are in power.

One thing going for Gloria though is that, like Corona and unlike Erap, she will be assured of availing the proceedings she is entitled under our laws.


asus, akala mo naman hindi nagpapalaganap ng hate ang site na ito. double standard? get real!


[…] the Aquinos, bragging about Pinoy Pride and being gullible to facts. This is already a cold truth. Philippine democracy is merely a sham. We opposed change because of stupid reasons. Our morality is flawed. We are destroying the fabric […]


[…] of the Aquino administration, as seen in the recent plunder case leading to her recent arrest. Even the Corona impeachment is nothing more than an extension of the outrage… nah, hate fad against GMA. The biggest target of the current administration may be to jail GMA […]


[…] Not only the media worshipped the oligarchs like heroes, with several Filipinos are happy to the point that they want to kill themselves, a religious institution that opposes change, we have an incompetent administration that rules the country. I will not regret that our political situation is very shit and turning tyrannical every day. […]