I had originally intended to put this out during President Duterte’s signing of the mental health law Republic Act 11036, which expanded mental health services. But with so many other events happening that raise it, including suicides and depression incidents making the news, it might as well be relevant every time.
Mental illness and disability are a source of debate. First, we have that one over whether patients should be in state-run institutions or crammed with their families (that’s for another article, though I am supportive of more assistance and services for mental health). But there is another side to it, which may be stated as discussing whether mental health patients are victims or still should be held responsible when they are in the wrong. There is that tendency to absolve someone who did wrong or committed a crime just because they have mental illness, similar to how people would defend thieves and robbers as justified to steal because they are “poor.”
|SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SOCIAL COMMENTARY!
Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
This brings up another question on the issue: what is really happening in a certain case, mental illness, or wrongdoing? Some claim some criminals suffer from some mental conditions and this is the reason for their actions. However, it is possible for a person to have done something wrong first, and then acquiring the condition as a result of their actions. Of course, I believe many people commit crimes without mental illness. And mental conditions should not be used as excuses for absolving a person.
Let’s say a certain woman wants another person’s spouse. Some people are just foolish enough to emotionally invest in it, so they believe it’s something great to to do. But let’s say she fails. The husband rebuffs her or the wife tells her off. She may become defensive, fight back though she’s in the wrong, or suddenly curl up into a ball of depression. She may then elicit pity and sympathy and people may defend her, sometimes to the point of saying she not mean any harm and wanting the sanctions accorded by justice not applied to her. But that is the problem: it will lead to impunity. She might even play the feminism or victim card. Sounds like the plot of a typical Filipino TV drama.
In the legal system of the United States, there is the debate on the insanity defense. It’s often used as a resort to reduce the punishment upon conviction. It’s a debate on whether to abolish that defense or not. However, I see more of the problem as how mental illness is actually addressed. So let’s say the convict is directed to receive mental health treatment as part of the sentence. There are likely some professionals who pander to the wrongs of patients. For example, when the patient who desires another’s spouse asks, “is it wrong,” the professional may answer, “it’s not, people do that all the time, and you deserve to have what you want.” It may even be used for bullies who some might analyze are also suffering from mental illness. So instead of doing justice to the bullied, it tries to paint the bully as a victim to give impunity. All of these are only roadblocks to solving the problems. Steps taken to address mental conditions fall short when some professionals skip a very important aspect of a person: individual responsibility.
This is something Filipinos are so eager to shirk because they want to avoid discomfort from being made to answer for their actions. But that is exactly why corruption is prevalent in Philippine society. It’s such an important concept that is perhaps being let fall by the wayside because of some current ideas and political persuasions. Yes, I mean SJWs.
I’m sure most sound treatments by mental health professionals include some focus on individual responsibility of the patient. It seems to me however that the thread of sentiment today most often associated with the liberal, progressive, “millennial” or leftist labels prefer that individual responsibility be overlooked and the blame be shifted to others. They might even say want the solution to be giving what the person and condoning their wrongs.
In the Christian ideas that I hold today, hell is no longer a fiery or icy place where people are tortured by demons. Instead, it is a prison locked from the inside. This is what I believe is happening with some mentally ill people. So when people want the wrong things, but then become mentally ill or are adversely affected by the consequences, they fall into a hell of their own making.
Many readings can be found all over, many that inspired my happiness article, that one of the causes of unhappiness, and thus mental illnesses such as depression, is wanting things that you don’t deserve or are better off not having. Countering this mentality is key to reducing mental health issues. Acceptance that there is no entitlement to wants must be highlighted these days more than ever.
Another factor today is some views about stress. Because excessive stress has been highlighted as a cause of disease today, it happens that misconceptions arise from such awareness. For example, some people believe that since stress itself is a problem, they avoid any stress at all. Wrong. The real problem is the excess of stress, not the presence of stress itself, as a moderate amount of stress, the one that comes with thinking, is necessary in life. Some level of stress means you are undergoing an activity where you work your brain, and that will make you healthy. Yes, that four-letter-word, work, is something that’s necessary for mental health.
If a person wants something wrong, then that stress is unnecessarily self-inflicted. It goes back to the lesson above: when avoiding sources of stress, remember that one source of stress can be yourself.
People do get sick from factors out of their control. But they also get sick from factors that are within their control. For example, a person who had a heart attack is known to love risky food. Even if he was warned not to eat them, he continued anyway. It’s known today that life choices affect health. Thus, I propose that we examine the motives and actions of people to see if they have contributed to their own breakdowns in health. But when doing so, never fall into the trap of being a vicious judge or chewing out the person concerned in anger. Restraint should be used when dealing with the patient.
Mental health today needs to have that idea of personal or individual responsibility re-emphasized. Filipinos as anyone else need to accept that misfortune in life can be self-inflicted, and is not always the fault of others. They should learn how to protect their mental integrity from their own mistakes, and stop persisting in self-destructive behavior. It means making the right kind of sacrifice, namely self-examining and giving up unnecessary wants. Strengthening personal responsibility for one’s own well-being and security will also help the person resist the malicious intrusions of others.
I believe, as my cohorts here do, that what Filipinos embrace as their culture is what actually pulls the country down. And those who seem to be anti-dictators, who may also believe themselves to be “heroes,” are the real dictators.