I feel a bit disappointed with some people when I find them believing anything or everything told to them about another person who is supposedly accused of some wrongdoing or has generally been portrayed as a target of “righteous” indignation.
Chismis or rumor is stereo-typically spun and circulated in coffee shops, barbershops, beauty salons, and the street corner sari-sari store. Rumor is formally defined as talk or opinion widely disseminated with no discernible source; or a statement or report current without known authority for its truth.
These days, one would consider it anachronistic to have to actually go to an actual physical place to “scoop up” the latest rumor.
|SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SOCIAL COMMENTARY!|
Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
The hip and “IN” thing these days (or has been for quite some time now) is to just fish out your smartphone, open your preferred social media app, and perhaps, if you have enough rumormongers in your social circle, you’ll get a flood of rumor as you scroll down your screen.
There are a number of reasons why people listen to and spread rumors. It can be that they feel it:
- gives them a sense of superiority
- gives them a sense of being part of a group
- allows them to get attention
- gives them control or power
- allows them to wreak vengeance
- relieves their boredom
Sometimes, rumor mongers resort to some subterfuge, prefacing the telling of their rumor by claiming it’s for the good of another person or the community. What gets me gagging, when I come across it sometimes, is when I find out that certain people are spreading rumors using the promotion some kind of social good as a pretext — like saving the environment, good governance, an end to corruption, championing the poor or the overburdened taxpayer. It annoys me but causes me no real worry as any pretensions of sincerely promoting a cause will get outed sooner or later.
What social media probably added as some sort of enhancement to spreading rumor is that, for a fee, you can advertise it on Facebook or have it tweeted/re-tweeted. What this does is that, instead of being limited to just your circle of friends, you can have your status update or tweet exposed to millions of people.
As far as I know, Facebook has a pretty liberal approach when it comes to what it allows to be advertised and you can pretty much buy a dozen or so tweets from certain celebrities who either don’t care about truthfulness or can’t discern between fact and fiction.
Now, it’s one thing to chance upon a rumor and a completely different thing to deliberately spread it for one reason or many reason$. For the regular folks, it engaging in rumor mongering may be a sinful pleasure, but for professional journalists and their self-styled self-publishing counterparts, it is can amount to a serious breach of ethics and standards.
In the case of the so-called P10 Billion Pork Barrel Scam, riding under the latest undulation of the Chito Neri Sex Video Scandal wave were two blogs Mom and Pop Moments and Dulz Speaks which supposedly carried revealing information about those accused in the latest corruption debacle.
A post by Noemi Lardizabal Dado on the Philippine Online Chronicle (an online publication I wrote two articles in) seems to give undue credence to someone who anonymously left a comment on Mom and Pops moment.
In her post, Dado says, “This particular blog instigated almost 700 comments as of this writing, the most controversial of which was from a “Mr. Anonymous” who shared information on the Napoles family’s ties with the public officials involved in the scam. He also revealed the name of those in the payroll, provided details on bank transactions and even shed light on the strategies used by the Napoles family in moving the money. Mr. Anonymous was clear in his lengthy revelations. The senators and congressman use the Napoles company (and others for sure) “to steal money from the people’s coffer – from you, from us”—his very words.”
The thing is, I had expected Dado (being the Editor of Blog Watch and features editor of Philippine Online Chronicles) would at least have devoted a few paragraphs to show that she had scrutinized Mr. Anonymous’ claims before passing it off. I do remember the many times in the past that Dado had called for “responsible and ethical” blogging, but now, it seems to be that probably what she had in mind and what I had in mind were vastly different.
There are a number of problems with giving credence to people who anonymously leave comments and then passing off or re-posting such comments without some effort at testing its credibility. The first problem is that the claims contained in an anonymous comment may not only be dubious, but could be just plain false and could unduly hurt peoples’ reputations.
For example, one of the comments left by Mr. Anonymous regarding an interview conducted by Korina Sanchez with Janet Lim Napoles. In the comment, Mr. Anonymous appears to be questioning the credibility of Sanchez and accusing current DILG Secretary Mar Roxas of some involvement in the Pork Barrel Scam.
I saw an interview of janet, jimmy and two of their children, jo-christine and his younger brother. The interview was conducted by Korina Sanchez. I was amazed how Korina played on the set and in a very sublime manner, projected the Napoles family as a victim.
Let me explain.
Korina is married to Mar Roxas. Mar is from Iloilo and he has a cousin, Johnny Roxas. Johnny stands 6’2, fair, brown hair and brown eyes. Johnny is a good looking male and a mestizo. Johnny used to work at JLN Corp. and he used his connections through Mar when he was still “Mr. Palengke.” Johnny earned significant amount of money by closing deals and getting the SARO of some congressmen and mayors and governors with the help of Mar. But Johnny had a fallout with Janet when some some cash commissions were not equally divided to him. He was also hoping to have a Mercedes Benz as a incentive from one of his successful transactions from a congressman based in Samar, bur Janet failed to deliver the car to him. Johnny soon left the company upset. Nevertheless, Johnny left JLN with few million pesos richer, and Mar Roxas a few million above 10M richer. Johnny Roxas became visible again in the political arena when he joined the campaign camp of Fernando Poe Jr. He was always visible on TV appearances and newspaper photos sitting or standing beside or behind Poe. With this said, Mar Roxas has ties with Napoles and that explains the interview with Korina that appears to be biased with the Napoles’. And you now know the reason why.
In response to Mr. Anonymous comment, another person going by the handle M230 said:
Mar Roxas does not have a cousin named Johnny Roxas. He only has 1 cousin and Johnny is not the name.
The Araneta-Roxas clan is worth so much more money, what is 10 million pesos to them? Magnanakaw ka na lang, bakit yang kakapiranggot pa na hindi man lang mararamdaman ni Mar. Magkano ba kinikita nila sa Araneta Center pa lang, sa Pizza Hut, sa Dairy Queen, sa Cibo, Cafe Bola, Sachi?
I believe there was a scam, but I don’t think you should drag other people in this controversy. If you really do know so much stuff, why not be an anonymous source for the NBI?
Thing is, M230’s reply seems to have rendered Mr. Anonymous claims a bit dubious and should make people wonder if there is, at all, a person named “Johnny Roxas”.
Further comments by Mr. Anonymous tend to make me doubt him even more, like for instance:
– Mr. Anonymous has his game show hosts mixed with the clowns in the senate. “The Revillames and Estradas are already preparing their speeches should this issue reach the senate.” (Last time I checked, there is NO senator Revillame. There is a Senator Bong Revilla, though.)
– It seems Mr. Anonymous has his timeline mixed up. “The explosions in the ayala properties were no coincidence. They used it as a platform to divert the attention of the masses so that local media will cover the explosion news instead of corruption expose’ involving key individuals from the congress and senate during those times.” ( The Glorietta Blast happened in 2007 and the Serendra Blast happened on May 31, 2013. The Philippine Daily Inquirer broke its series of stories on the Pork Barrel Scam on July 12, 2013. Moreover, there is no dearth of one kind of explosion or another in this country, like for instance the Chito Neri Scandal or the CDO blast. Saying that one or the other is a diversionary tactic aimed at covering up the investigation into the Pork Barrel Scam is ludicrous, more so if it refers to the Chito Miranda Sex Video.)
-Now here’s a patently outrageous claim, first Mr. Anonymous says this: “People in the internet challenges me if i have proof. No i do not. But i can tell you that there are two metal safes inside JLN Corp.’s office at 2502 Discovery Suites in ortigas. One safe is inside Jimmy Napoles’ office and the other one is in Janet’s office.” And then, rather conveniently hedges this claim by saying, “If by any chance that this blog has reached the Napoles family, they will move these safes and drawers outside their office ASAP. ” (Really? If that’s true, then perhaps it’s also true that Michael Jackson was really still alive when they brought him to the hospital but killed him again because his record sales shot up.)
I am certain may be other comments by Mr. Anonymous that really deserves some manner of scrutiny before you decide on clicking “share”.
As for how one should treat anonymous comments or anonymous sources, it is best to keep in mind that any body can publish or say any number of things on the internet and finding out the truth or falsehood of a claim should be the writer’s first concern. For a good guide on how to treat anonymous sources, whether you are a blogger or journalist, it is best to keep referring back to Reuters’ guidelines or any professional news organization guidelines on the matter.
Making a huge mistake in this will probably make you more of a professional rumormonger than a credible blogger or journalist.
31 Replies to “An Anonymous Comment As A “Credible News Source” in the P10 Pork Barrel Scam”
Three things we can take away from this:
First, it’s appalling that in today’s celebrity obsessed culture, sensationalism trumps reality. Nobody’s interested in verifying facts anymore. In stories like this, there shouldn’t even be any hesitation about doing the research. And there wasn’t even any effort required to zero in on “Anonymous'” inconsistencies. Seems the juicer the story the more mileage it gets. Regardless of the truth.
Second, our society has become incredibly cynical. We’ll believe anything they write about our politicians and by extension the Filipino “elite.” Especially if it tends to bring them down a peg or two. I guess not a few of us are a leeettle bit jealous of our fellows who can afford to drive around Los Angeles in a Porsche. 😉
Third — the other side of that coin is that our leaders haven’t really given us reason to believe that crimes perpetrated by the wealthy will be prosecuted and (if proven) the guilty punished. Seen in that light, one can begin to understand why Filipinos have become so cynical. There’re generations frustrated by a system that favours the few and the rest just want things to be a little more egalitarian.
you should not judge a hitler by his genocide.
many say he was a good bloke, and life and soul of the concentration camps. i don’t think he was ever convicted of anything either.
He was convicted in 1923 after the Beer Hall Putsch. He served one year for that failed coup. One year! Guess they did think he was a good guy. And Mein Kampf was such a cheery, motivational, and uplifting piece of work.
I think Hitler’s role in the mass killing of Jews has been pretty well established.
The thing with the the P10 Billion Pork Barrel Scam is that it has begun turning into a circus because of Toto Causing’s expose on Jeane Napoles and this Mr. Anonymous blog.
Not that I don’t like circuses.
Are you on crack paul? http://downwithpaulfarol.wordpress.com/paul-farol-is-a-drug-addict-always-wants-crack/
You just made a troll blog just to attack a person?
You’re biggest CRACK EVER!! Why? Because you’re a TROLL!!
Photoshopped. Mr. Anonymous, you just proved Mr. Farol right with your post. I am not Filipino, not a writer, but I agree that you have inconsistencies. And going incognito is just plain cowardice. LOL
Off topic, ad hominem… Troll some MOAR.
i have to agree. No matter how detailed and no matter how seemingly accurate information from an anonymous source is, it should be verified. Even big news orgs like CNN caution viewers when giving unverified info
If it is unverified or if its authenticity is dubious, why publish or broadcast it at all.
That was the issue that surrounded the documents supposedly proving Noynoy Aquino was mentally unstable.
what category are wikileaks
If we are to judge published articles by their reliability, WikiLeaks revelations have been proven to be verifiable. They have a trail that can be followed. And the US has declared Julian Assange an enemy for publishing secrets they claim assisted their enemies.
As far as I know, Wikileaks claims to disseminate confidential communications from government agencies and embassies.
Anonymous comments are far from wikileaks, particularly this one which doesn’t even try to present any thing that would support its claims.
If at all the writer of these anonymous comments wanted to prove his or her credibility, they would have at least put out something that could be verified.
Well they did say JLN owns parking space 1,2,3 of Discovery Suites, we can verify that right? and then they said JLN has accounts in a few banks mentioned (with branches named), that can be verified too… maybe don’t edit hat you read. just saying.. 🙂 i’m open to anything, still thinking..
Mr. Mar Roxas is from Capiz. Roxas City, the provincial capital of Capiz, is named after his grandfather, Manuel Roxas. He is not from Iloilo..
From what i have seen/read there is a great deal which can either be verified, or conversely dismissed by napoles through facts, not libel threats and hysterics, a strategy which only adds creedence to the information and her guilt.
Simple enough to publish her annual report for her international company, which doesnt seem to exist or be registered with sec.
Oh sorry that was last week. Now its a 200 million peso inheritance from some unknown benefactor.
Some peoole are so gullible they deserve to be conned, and filipinos usually are.
Never trust a frenchman with your car, an italian with your girlfriend, or a filipino with anything.
Good point. All Janet really has to reveal are the names of the companies (whether Philippine, Indonesian, or whatever) and I suppose it’ll be easy enough to find information about it on the internet.
Given the pummeling she’s getting online and in the traditional press over this, I think the decision to reveal this information would be easy enough to make.
So far, the point that Mr. Anonymous makes about Janet’s decision not to reveal more details about her sources of income is one of the things that got muddled by his or her rather jarring glitches. But anyway, the same point has been put across by others.
Then again, I also came across a point when I felt I was being pressured to reveal my sources of income publicly (this was the time when Orion Dumdum was claiming I was jobless and living off my wife’s income) and I tell you, I was so close to revealing my financial records. In my case what stopped me was the fact that I am still under an NDA (Non disclosure agreement) and I have business partners. Although, just to settle things, I had wanted to show Orion personally my financial records if only he’d come to my house in Marikina. Thing is, he didn’t take me up on that offer and he hasn’t retracted any of his accusations.
In addition to this, I think it’s kind of dangerous these days to reveal one’s finances to all and sundry — like you said, Filipinos can’t be trusted.
This is a nice article. I did read the blog, and shared it. But the purpose was different, to let, whoever are interested from my connections, verify the authenticity of its content.
And yes, one doubt also came to me, when he told a relation of Mar Roxas from the supposed another persona. Which seemed to me, was instead trying to destroy the reputation of Korina Sanchez. But it’s a long story I read 2 day ago.
Mr. Anonymous did come up with some pretty good revelations, but on the whole, the glitches in his revelation really stopped me from buying into them.
If this were a testimony being made in court, baka maitapon lang dahil sa mga glitches na ito. Sayang, really.
believe none of what you hear and half of what you see.
it is doubtful that these people are not guilty of laundering money, but there is NO accountability in the country and therefore no real proof. the people are constantly lied to.
How anyone can believe anything that comes out of the mouths of the people involved OR the elected representatives of the people, or appointed officials?
That’s why, in a court, evidence is scrutinized and tested.
LMAO, the ‘justice’ system that is place in the country is a BAD JOKE.
there is no such thing as a credible court in the entire archipelago. a true cesspool of graft, corruption and massive theft of funds. In short, the entire system is corrupted and not a single thing that comes out of it is believable.
the person in question is in no way capable of amassing such fabulous wealth legitimately, it is impossible and can in no way be believed.
ONE thing is certain.
The person in question will not go to jail, no illegal wealth will be confiscated. the people will continue to be robbed at will by those with the power to do so. To WIT: what happened to the old guy who handed out illegal ‘gifts’, directly from the treasury, to his friends last Christmas?
So, are you suggesting that we just set aside the judicial system completely and go for an old fashioned lynching?
Lynchings might be good for the cinema or Carlo J. Caparas comics serials. Not good in the real world. It means you have given up on the rule of law. It rarely implies that you have another system to replace it that’s more effective.
Ok, maybe his claims are a bit sketchy but if we dismiss all claims like these. Might as well let all our corrupt politicians get away with it. In Singapore now, they’re putting a public official in jail for receiving a blow job, we can’t even get one for taking millions.
Mar Roxas is the son of Judi Araneta Roxas and former Jerry Roxas from Roxas City provice of Capiz.and grandson of Amado Araneta not in ILOILO.
And there goes San Juan blast. boom.
And a mysterious clash between a cargo vessel and a passenger ship in Cebu 🙁 sad.. we’ve gone to the dogs. *sigh*
Mar Roxas is the son of Judi Araneta Roxas and former Jerry Roxas from Roxas City provice of Capiz.and grandson of Amado Araneta not in ILOILO.
DON’T BE FOOLED! All those SENATORS knew who the real MASTERMIND/s off all these pork barrel SCAMS… None of them can’t expose names but need somebody like this scapegoat or non-government personnel to “TELL ALL”. But just hearing all these make those involved “TRULY GUILTY” those HIGH GOV. OFFICIALS will never in their life admit to it anyway.
As for this scapegoat to get under her skin all her kids should have their photos taken/post and ridicule thru all forms of media so they’ll be reminded of what their parents have done. I’m pretty sure they’ll be living abroad after all these fiasco UNFAIR? WELL THEY BENEFITED AND WILL CONTINUE TO BENEFIT from all these ill gotten wealth because that is the price for her to be in jail and her kids to live the same LIFESTYLE. That’s what the ITALIAN MAFIA SAY – you go after their FAMILIES.
Same with all the named senators, congressman, and representatives. None of their close family should be allowed into the same Gov. Office because they will just continue the same “DEVILISH DYNASTY POLICIES”