Driving a jeepney is a parasitical profession

Do jeepneys have a future in Philippine public transport? The answer most people would like to hear to the above question is quite disturbing.

Jeepneys have a future because these provide employment to hundreds of thousands of Filipinos. They will be deprived of a livelihood if jeepneys are phased out.

What is wrong with this answer? Simple. It does not answer the question. Rather, it misses the point of the question by a mile by sidestepping the issue of whether jeepneys have a place in a society that aspires to modernise. Worse, such an answer suggests that jeepney drivers are entitled to employment and that a change in circumstances that results in the disappearance of their livelihood is everyone’s problem.

These jeepney drivers and the bleeding-heart “activists” who encourage that kind of crybaby attitude should get real jobs, because driving a jeepney is essentially a parasitical profession. The entire jeepney industry takes advantage of a failure of government to do essential nationkeeping jobs. Jeepneys are like the cockroaches that move into a house managed by a poor housekeeper or homemaker. When a more competent housekeeper takes over, the first thing on the agenda is to exterminate vermin that infested said house under the previous watch.

These jeepneys, these insults to the public transport sector, are relics of post World War II Manila. The chaos jeepneys represent reflect the state of chaos Manila was in just after it was flattened by American and Japanese shelling. These contraptions came in to fill a void left after the once-proud public transport infrastructure built by the Americans in Manila went up in smoke. They’ve been there since. Fast forward from Philippine Independence Day to the second decade of the 21st Century and you will find Manila still looking like a post-Liberation city of 1946 thanks to the cockroach-like jeepneys that infest it.

Today, this parasitical industry is allowed to persist because, as “activists” say, they, “at least”, provide livelihood to able-bodied Filipino men who would otherwise be spending their days drinking beer at the corner store. These “activists” think they are doing these “hapless” Filipino men a favour by defending their parasitical sources of livelihood. The fact is, they are actually insulting Filipino manhood.

Indeed, the disturbing assumption that props up “activist” rhetoric that defends the jeepney industry is that Filipino jeepney drivers will simply lay down and starve to death if jeepneys are wiped off the face of Philippine cities. These “activists” have all but convinced these men that driving the jeepney is all they are worth to the Philippine economy and that if that “job” disappears, they are as good as dead. The extent to which the idea that jeepney drivers are victims has hijacked the whole “debate” around the future of Philippine public transport is such that the Philippine Government itself is paralysed by inaction when it comes to implementing the obvious solution to the jeepney problem.

Even more laughable are the appeals to emotion of these “activists”. They beseech the Philippine public not only to put up with but to support the occasional strikes launched by these “public transport workers” in consideration of their “plight”. You just gotta laugh. Consideration, they say? When was the last time anyone has seen a jeepney driver showing the same consideration for the other motorists with whom they share the road with?

Enough is enough. Jeepneys and the men who drive them have no place in a country that aspires to be a modern and truly proud nation. Public transport is too important a factor in national development to be left to the devices of a bunch of parasites and the “thought leaders” and politicians who coddle them.

print

Post Author: benign0

benign0 is the Webmaster of GetRealPhilippines.com.

Leave a Reply

10 Comments on "Driving a jeepney is a parasitical profession"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
patrizia
Guest

at the rate these jeepney strikes or “caravan” are being staged, to the inconvenience of the riding public, i am beginning to agree more and more that these old wartime jeepneys should be totally phased out!

D.
Guest
At for once I totally agree with that text. But why not to mention the highly corrupt system that allow few individuals that own jeepneys companies to make such good money on the back of that government failure? Those drivers would drink all day if they loose their job? They already drink and use drugs all day for most of them… What about the laziness of Pinoys that cannot walk 5 meters and need a jeepney to stop and go for those 5 meters? How would they do if that service stops? One solution: shoot them all, comparing them with… Read more »
Jim DiGriz
Guest
Jepneys are the worst traffic offenders and the worst polluters. Just by enforcing already existing laws 99% these rolling coffins would be off the road because they don’t even fulfill the most basic safety standards. These jeepney drivers are vermin. Their vehicles an insult to the commuting public. These vehicles have never been maintained, they stink, are dirty, the seats ripped to shreds. Filipinos are lazy fuckers, face it. Where else in the world would you have a public transport that stops every few meters so some lard-ass does not have to walk till the next street corner. Students even… Read more »
Prakas Dhu
Guest
I think the whole exercise posed the wrong question. It is not about the future of the jeepneys (or its role or worth or contribution) in the country’s public transport that we should be talking about but the option available to us if ever jeepneys are eradicated on the face of the earth. Sadly, the writeup never mentioned anything about that issue. Enumerating all the wrongs in having these jeepneys in our streets to the point of calling it “cockroaches” also missed the point completely. In every wrong mentioned there is an equal right that supports the existence of jeepneys.… Read more »
ChinoF
Member
The Jeepney is itself is a symbol of failure to solve a problem in its history. First, it was used as a stopgap measure because of the destruction of the tranvia during World War 2. Leftover Wilys MBs (the original Jeep) were taken by Filipinos (wonder if that reflects the Filipino desire to live on pillages) to be converted into temporary transport until a replacement for the tranvia was made. But that replacement never came, and jeepneys stayed. What made jeepneys more dangerous was the boundary system, that business model that makes drivers race dangerously and cut off competition in… Read more »
453Hyden007Toro98976.99
Guest
453Hyden007Toro98976.99

Unless, we do away with this obsolete transport system; we will never have an efficient transport system.

Jeepneys are World War II relics, that are inefficient and gas guzzlers…electric rail system are more efficient to move a lot of people, and are more efficient in operation…

During the time the great inventor, Thomas Edison, invented the Electric Bulb. Many Candle Makers/Lamp Makers, may had been complaining, because their jobs were made obsolete by the electric bulb.

We can draw the same situation now, with these jeepney drivers , as better transport system are invented and are developed.

Ponse
Guest

Agreed on all points. Unfortunately a stop gap is better then none at all. This is the fault of our leaders more then the drivers themselves. The only way to wipe out these parasites out is for the nation to develop a more modern and more efficient transportation system. Build more subway and trains.

ChinoF
Member

Agreed with Ponse. It will keep boiling down to developing a better working public transport system. A lawyer-friend said, as long as public transport remains a cottage industry, we’ll never see it improve.

d_forsaken
Guest

A parasitical profession seldom altogether abandon a monarch so long as the crown still glitters on their head.

Niall R
Guest
I fail to see how jeepney drivers can be considered parasites when they provide a service that millions of Filipinos use every day. The jeepney of today is ancient technology and probably poorly maintained, but a modern vehicle of similar size and capacity would certainly be an acceptable replacement. Look on YouTube for Thai Baht Buses as an example of what appear to be Japanese pickups adapted to carry passengers. I have seen the UVExpress vehicles in Manila, and am not impressed by what seems to be the poor design. It also strikes me that many of the roads used… Read more »
wpDiscuz