US Supreme Court Justice Scalia dies: Filipinos should be familiar with the controversy of SC appointments

Antonin_Scalia,_SCOTUS_photo_portrait
The deceased: SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia

The news that recently came out of the United States was that one of its Supreme Court Justices, Antonin Scalia, died on February 13 of natural causes in a West Texas ranch.

Appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in 1986 by then president Ronald Reagan, Scalia has had a reputation as being solidly ultra-conservative, along with fellow SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas. He is one of those who, in 2015, voted against marriage equality for same-sex marriages.

Justice Scalia’s death has prompted quite a bit of a reaction from the legal and political realm within the United States. Much of it focuses on the nomination of his replacement, a constitutional duty which now falls to outgoing president Barack Obama.

Republicans contend that the next president should be the one to nominate Scalia’s replacement. Through a few official statements from some of them, the sentiment is that they will do everything they can to block any nominations that president Obama, a Democrat, will attempt to make. One such example is from US Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell (R,Ky):

“Today our country lost an unwavering champion of a timeless document that unites each of us as Americans. Justice Scalia’s fidelity to the Constitution was rivaled only by the love of his family: his wife Maureen his nine children, and his many grandchildren. Through the sheer force of his intellect and his legendary wit, this giant of American jurisprudence almost singlehandedly revived an approach to constitutional interpretation that prioritized the text and original meaning of the Constitution. Elaine and I send our deepest condolences to the entire Scalia family.

“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court Justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new President.”

Quite a few comments left on his Facebook page expressed disagreement with him, with the gist of it including the following:

“McConnell is an obstructionist”. “The president should be allowed to fulfill his constitutional duty”. “Such a statement is partisan politics at its finest”. “It is implied that the filling of the vacancy should be postponed in the hopes that a Republican president will emerge”. “The people chose Obama to be president in 2010, and McConnell does not seemingly recognize such”.

President Obama, for his part, is determined to fulfill his constitutional duty as president. We must take note that the next US national elections are on November 2016, about 7 months from now. Obama contends that this is ample time to make nominations, and for the Senate to fulfill its responsibility in evaluating his nominee/s. However, for a nominee to pass, it requires 60 out of the 100 votes in the Republican-controlled Senate.

Why should Filipinos be bothered to read or learn about the goings-on in American political circles? Well, the controversy that usually surrounds Supreme Court (SC) appointments, especially those that are made during election years, should be familiar to Filipinos.

gloria_arroyo
Gloria Arroyo: vilified for doing the same things BS Aquino did

Recall how in 2010, then outgoing president Gloria Arroyo copped a lot of flak for nominating then SC Associate Justice Renato Corona to Chief Justice (CJ) too close to the elections that year. There is supposedly a ban on appointments two months before elections. Corona was nominated as one of the possible nominees to replace outgoing CJ Reynato Puno. Despite the Philippine Judicial Bar Council (JBC) opening the nominations, and the SC ultimately dismissing petitions to stop the nomination and appointment of a replacement CJ, current president Benigno Simeon “BS” Aquino III resurrected the issue, and made a big fuss about it, during the first two years of his term. Corona was eventually impeached in 2012.

An unpleasant future awaits President BS Aquino should an 'uncooperative' candidate win the 2016 elections.
BS Aquino does not want this to happen after he steps down as president.

Recall also, that during his term, BS Aquino has had to make his own appointments to the SC. Maria Lourdes Sereno, whose qualifications and psychological fitness have been questioned, was appointed as Corona’s replacement. Marvic Leonen was appointed to the seat vacated by Sereno, with many suspecting that it was for his work in the “peace negotiations” with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), which led to a controversial framework agreement and the Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL). And just at the start of this year, 2016, BS Aquino appointed former Department of Justice (DOJ) Secretary Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa to replace retiring SC Justice Martin Villarama, Jr.

2016 happens to be an election year for the Philippines as well. Manila Times columnist Rigoberto Tiglao filed a report stating that the retirement of Villarama comes under questionable circumstances. Villarama was slated to retire on April 24, 2016, but opted to do so earlier. Although Villarama cited “deteriorating health” for his early retirement, it was allegedly under the convincing of Aquino political adviser Ronaldo Llamas. BS Aquino most likely wanted to avoid the situation of appointing Justices too close to the elections, and to pack the SC with his nominees as early as possible.

The key points to highlight are the following:

At the very least, some of the American electorate recognize the need for, and importance of, a fully-functional Supreme Court, (i.e, no vacancies) and are willing to stand up for it. The Filipino electorate, on the other hand, generally just do not seem to care, or are letting the politicians do the thinking for them. The very same politicians they keep complaining about.

Isn’t it but natural for a president to appoint a Justice with similar political or ideological leanings? Whether it is here or in the US this observation seems to hold true. Whether it is right or not is another issue entirely. Don’t we, in our daily lives, naturally gravitate towards people who mirror our own beliefs and perceptions anyway? Doesn’t like attract like when it comes to social interactions?

Therefore, BS Aquino has come out looking like a hypocrite. Not that he or his followers care anyway. He is simply being consistent; anything that Arroyo did smacked of politics and of stacking the odds to her favor and is corrupt, period. If BS Aquino does the same thing, it is with “good intentions”, it is for the sake of Daang Matuwid (Straight Path), and must not be questioned, because he is “not corrupt”. Gloria Arroyo’s continued detention seems to be, to this day, the only thing lending any sense of legitimacy to BS Aquino’s remaining administration. Never mind that the cases against her so far have all been dismissed.

And for that, BS Aquino has been no different from that of presidents past. In some cases, worse. Too bad Filipinos fell for that rhetoric of change six years ago. Whether they’ll be able to learn in the upcoming elections remains to be seen.

Currently, the SC is involved in the hearings regarding the disqualification of Grace Poe-Llamanzares as a presidential candidate. Rumors abound that Grace Poe is BS Aquino’s Plan B to stay out of jail; his primary manok, Mar Roxas, has been lagging in the surveys consistently. Of course BS Aquino would like to stay out of jail after he steps down; it would not be surprising if his political enemies are only too eager to file cases against him once his immunity from suit ceases.

Analysts, observers, and critics of the SC note that how it rules on Grace Poe’s disqualification is going to be an indication of its independence and competence. Will it stay faithful to and defend the constitution? Will it put political considerations first, especially those from the appointing president? What will the effect of the ruling be on the upcoming elections?

As always, stay tuned for the next show, the next stop in the tour, the next chapter, whatever you want to call it…

[Display image courtesy: architecture.about.com]

print

About FallenAngel

А вы, друзья, как ни садитесь, все в музыканты не годитесь. – But you, my friends, however you sit, not all as musicians fit.

Post Author: FallenAngel

А вы, друзья, как ни садитесь, все в музыканты не годитесь. – But you, my friends, however you sit, not all as musicians fit.

Leave a Reply

33 Comments on "US Supreme Court Justice Scalia dies: Filipinos should be familiar with the controversy of SC appointments"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Vince
Guest
Antonin Scalia was the attack dog of the Neo-Cons. Whenever it was convenient to try to interpet the US Constitution, which was NEVER supposed to be the SC’s job to begin with, Scalia endeavoured to try to act as if he were an original writer of the document. AND THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE.An ‘originalist’ is what he was referred to as and that is just ludicrous as mind reading someone who has beed dead for over 200 years. Some of his bigger contrivances were giving the Corporations the same rights as citizens (Citizens United,2011) and various other ‘BOR’ reducing decisions. My… Read more »
Johnny Saint
Guest
TRUE — judicial interpretation/review is NOT explicitly stated as one of the functions of the Supreme Court in either the 1987 Philippine constitution or the US constitution on which the former is based. However, ‘Vince’s’ post is only partially true in that it is out of context. ‘FallenAngel’ is correct in saying that in order to fulfill those functions of the high court which are specified, practicality requires the judiciary to interpret constitutional documents, especially when it involves the constitutionality of other legislation, treaties and international agreements, executive policies, and the protection of constitutional rights. Moreover, contrary to what ‘Vince’… Read more »
Vince
Guest

*****Correction , the last sentence above should read:

…….and it was never the intention of the writer’s of the US Constitution to have the document interpretted by the Supreme Court.

In addition:
Nowhere in the US Constitution is it written that it is the job of the Supreme Court to interpret the document.NOWHERE….and this guy did it in a way that was derisive & divisive, to say the least.

889Hyden007Toro88888.99
Guest
889Hyden007Toro88888.99

In a true Democracy, there is a Balance of Power, between the: Executive, Legislative and Judicial parts of the government.

What Aquino and his Liberal Party did was usurp, the Legislative and Judicial parts of the government.

Aquino corrupted the Legislative Body, thru Pork Barrel Bribery.

He usurped the Judicial Body, by impeaching SC Justice Renato Corona.

He is now the Virtual Dictator of the Philippines. He wants to protect his Hacienda Luisita.

Adolf Hitler did the same way to become the Nazi Fuhrer in Nazi Germany. Hitler even burned, the Reichstag, the Legislative body of Germany.

Maybe, Aquino will do the same…

JOEY-SAN
Guest
@HT, Aquino did not usurp the judicial branch, it was all a smoke screen for the robbery that was found out about and then covered up again, THE DAP scandal. Corona suffered no loss of money, did not go to jail for deliberately fixing, at the request of the oligarch friend of Aquino that owns PAL airlines, the PAL SC decision in favor of the company after the SC had already ruled for the employee’s. A subsequent investigation revealed Corona had taken (and never gave back) a $100,000.00 bribe to fuck the PAL employee’s out of Union representation/healthcare benefits and… Read more »
888Hyden007Toro88899.99
Guest
888Hyden007Toro88899.99
It is a usurpation of the Judicial Branch, with Aquino, appointing his Justices. It is very clear, that Aquino wanted to protect his Hacienda Luisita. Aquino also removed the Judge in the Sandigan Bayan, and appointed his own. See how he usurped also the Legislative Branch thru Pork Barrel Bribery? How about the DAP, PDAF, etc…which he used together with the Thief, Abad, to steal taxpayers’ money… Hacienda Luisita, the land the Aquinos scammed from the Philippine government, is the root of the greed of Aquino for power. It is clear, as a sunny day, that he wanted to protect… Read more »
Johnny Saint
Guest
Still dredging this up after three years? The bribery incident involved Justice Corona allegedly receiving a ‘platinum card’ from Philippine Airlines that afforded him several perks. Among these was free first class travel for Corona and his wife. The government charges that he reversed the Supreme Court decision in favour of the FASAP union because of this. During the impeachment trial, Senator Enrile refused to allow this to be heard as part of the government’s case. The reason? The impeachment complaint DID NOT SPECIFY BRIBERY. Article 3 of the complaint specifies ‘betrayal of public trust and culpable violation of the… Read more »
Johnny Saint
Guest
It should be remembered that the ONLY charge for which Justice Corona was found guilty was the second article in the impeachment — a failure to “disclose to the public his statement of assets, liabilities, and net worth” (SALN). It should also be noted that the reason he was convicted of that charge was the blatant lie told by Ombudsman Conchita Morales regarding his supposed ‘unexplained wealth’ amounting to US$12 million as well as the ownership of several mansions and condominium units. In fact, ALL of the charges against Renato Corona were effectively proven to be factually wrong or based… Read more »
777Hyden007Toro999.99
Guest
777Hyden007Toro999.99

How about the Pork Barrel Bribery on Senators and Congressmen done by Aquino? How about Aquino and Abad stealing taxpayers’ money thru DAP, PDAF, etc…

Aquino should be Impeached and jailed ,also…but he usurped already the legislative and judicial branches of the government.

SCJustice Corona is just a small case. Compared to scams of Aquino: Hacienda Luisita ownership scam; Pork Barrel Bribery; PDAF; DAP; etc…Aquino is a thief on a tremendous scale. Worse than Marcos…

Johnny Saint
Guest
HydenToro, Throughout your career posting comments on GRP, there is no question that you have an unhealthy obsession with the Aquinos and have taken every opportunity possible to vilify them. Even to the point of regurgitating unsubstantiated rumour and outlandish gossip. ‘JOEY-SAN’s’ comment makes mention of the lies that paint Justice Corona as having been bribed by PAL. Allegations which were never proven (and therefore never included in the impeachment) but nonetheless serve as fodder for the anti-government/anti-elite/anti-reason crowd. The lie has been refuted and no amount of ranting by ‘JOEY-SAN’ and his ilk will turn a lie into truth.… Read more »
Observer
Guest

Aren’t we on the verge of falling for yet another rhetoric of change, like most of us did six years ago? 🙁

888Hyden007Toro9999.99
Guest
888Hyden007Toro9999.99
@Johnny Saint: If you are obssesed in protecting the Aquinos. Then, so be it. I will continue to attack the Aquinos, from time to time. They are the causes of the dismal situations of our country. If you believe what I write, then, believe it. If not, then it is your choice. I’m not forcing you to believe me … Is Hacienda Luisita scam, not true? Are DAP, PDAF, Pork Barrel Bribery , not true? Is their support of the NPA, not true? Just look at the NPA people in Morong, Rizal , he released. The Typhoon Yolanda Relief funds… Read more »
888Hyden007Toro9999.99
Guest
888Hyden007Toro9999.99

@Johnny Saint:

It is your choice, if you believe me or not. I am not forcing you to believe, what I write.

Just look at the condition of our country…are you blind. See what Aquino has done in his term. Are you blind and deaf?

Johnny Saint
Guest

What I am is someone who is not blinded by an irrational obsession with a balding, socially inept, incompetent boob and his ilk. I am someone who will not reduce each and every last unpopular or unfortunate circumstance in life to the machinations of a single person or their clan.

999Hyden007Toro9999.99
Guest
999Hyden007Toro9999.99

@Johnny Saint:

I am not forcing you to read my blogs. And, I am not forcing you to behave, in anyway, you want me to behave.

If you don’t like my blogs, simply don’t read them. It seems you are hurt by my attacks…What is your business in defending the Aquinos, anyway? Are you their paid troll?

And by the way, Aquino’s Hackers , are very frustrated in hacking my computer and stopping my blogs…

Johnny Saint
Guest

And there it is! Again.

This is precisely what saddens me most.

The slightest disagreement with your rhetoric and you automatically accuse the dissenter of being a paid Aquino lackey without considering the merits of the opinion offered or providing reasoned arguments. That’s irrational. And the assumption that Aquino fanatics are out to get you is beginning to sound like paranoia that is almost comical.

Frank dissent doesn’t mean we all have to agree to loathe the Aquinos the way you do.

JOEY-SAN
Guest

AND WHAT CLUE DO THE FAILIPINO’s NEED TO GET,JOEY-SAN?’
‘That the elites in the country need to be eradicated, done away with, exterminated like the vermin they are….’

OK? GET THE PICTURE? IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH?
If not, NOT ONE SINGLE THING WILL CHANGE, NOT ONE !!!

staser
Guest

Many people here in the US believe he was murdered for standing up to the growing Marxist influence in the US. He had no known health problems. And despite that, they refuse to even perform an autopsy to determine the cause of death. It seems rather peculiar that he would die just a few days after Ash Wednesday and just months before the US Presidential election.

Johnny Saint
Guest
So now it’s a CONSPIRACY THEORY? Why? Is it because Justice Scalia did not disclose the intimate details of his life on social media? Contrary to popular belief, while Supreme Court members are public officials, they are not required to reveal information about their health. The judge’s physician acknowledges he was suffering from chronic heart troubles and high blood pressure. The judge was not allowed to undergo surgery to treat a shoulder injury because his body was too weak. It isn’t unusual for someone in failing health to suddenly stop breathing. The insinuation that Justice Scalia’s death was not quite… Read more »
ChinoF
Member

The same people who entertain these conspiracy theories are probably the same ones who assume the Illuminati and the Rothschilds are behind everything, and every world event is fake and a stage show. LOL

For me, the guy’s just old, and people die when their time is up, that’s all. Are there people who believe that death isn’t real and people are simply spirited away to some place where they actually live forever (like Elvis, Manilyn Monroe, Adolf Hitler, and lately, Michael Jackson)? (Laughing again)

Johnny Saint
Guest

ChinoF,

Clearly you don’t know what you’re talking about. Justice Scalia’s murder (if it does turn out to be murder) was obviously ordered by a group headed Leonard Nimoy (who faked his death a year ago) in order to remove impediments Barack Obama’s liberal agenda and to stifle a possible Supreme Court ruling over former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s email controversy.

Johnny Saint
Guest

By the way, in case you haven’t heard, Leonard Nimoy is the newest leader of the Illuminati. He’d been consolidating power over liberal groups ever since he faked his death and intends to expand their control over world governments by promoting the adoption of European-style socialist policies.

I can hear heads exploding across the Internet right about now…

ChinoF
Member

Wow, that’s the story of the century! Or of the Millenium! I gotta apply to the Illuminati so I can be immortal!

Grimwald
Member

Nah, you’re BOTH wrong! From what I gather, it’s William Shattner!

benign0
Admin

Usually the simplest explanation or theory turns out to be the most sound one.

d_forsaken
Guest

Law: the only game where the best players get to sit on the bench.

dagaress
Guest

Much of it focuses on the nomination of his replacement, a constitutional duty which now falls to outgoing president Barack Obama. Where is this information?