Holding on to Heritage Causes rather than Solves our Country’s Problems

The late Carlos Celdran’s claim to fame is being a promoter of heritage and culture. He caters to those who believe that preserving heritage and culture is what Filipino need to improve the country. I disagree.

Let me borrow Ronald Reagan’s style for this: heritage is not the solution to our problem; heritage is the problem.

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

This assertion shocks some, indeed. How could heritage be a problem? Get Real Philippines’ primary thesis is that the problems of our society’s problems come from culture and heritage. As I said in my profile, even the cultures that we cherish and seek to preserve can be a source of our problems.

I mentioned before that cultures are a product of human attempts at survival. One purpose of culture is to mark people as desirable and undesirable, then eliminate the latter. This is because of the perception of resources being limited; you can’t let everyone had access to resources, so you have to cut people off. Conflict, like economics, is a by-product of limited resources.

Our country’s heritage may have its ups, such as dress, dance, art and more. But we also have downs. We had headhunting (another way to get rid of undesirables), which the Americans made us get rid of, and for good reason. Our tribalism is part of our old heritages that hate being part of an unwieldy entity such as a nation-state. It leads some to want violent separation, such as with the MNLF and MILF insurgencies. Heritage is not always uniting, but also divisive. That is one topic of the classic Heritage of Smallness of Nick Joaquin.

Indeed, when you mention heritage, whose heritage are you talking about? I believe Celdran during his Manila tours claimed to support all of Filipino culture, but it is fair to raise doubt about that claim. His critics say he only supports the Manila-centric, patronage politics-driven elitist culture.

Benign0 often mentions the jeepney, which after World War 2 seemed like a good idea, but years after became a symbol of stagnation and lack of solutions (specifically for transportation).

Our political patronage and dynasties are an ugly part of our Filipino heritage. It has led to the corruption, arrogance and incompetence we’ve been see in our governments.

Alex Tizon’s My Family’s Slave demonstrates that slavery is another ugly part of our heritage. I’m sure many Filipinos would love to have slaves.

Also on family, some people believe that forcing children to take care of parents in old age is a superior heritage. That makes Filipino families more “caring,” so to speak. This is more like the reason Filipinos are poor, because they are saddled with more burdens than they should have; young Filipino parents are saddled with caring for elderly as well as their own children. More advanced countries instead have benefits and facilities to take the load of caring for the elderly off their children. That is more caring and is the real superior practice.

Even things done for the sake of heritage and patriotism can be misguided. For example, look at old “fake news” that say Flores invented the fluorescent lamp, a Filipino invented the lunar rover and a Filipino named Armando Lite inventing the M-16 or Armalite. All these hoaxes have the purpose of glorifying the Filipino, but they do it through lies.

There is the victim mentality also done through lies, a glaring example being the claim that the Filipinos chocolate company (I wonder if Celdran visited that in Spain) insulted us in their products, leading to that ridiculous fracas where a local politician protested something that a Spanish company supposedly did, but really didn’t. And nobody really cared anyway, thankfully, because it was stupid.

Instead of just rushing and gnashing our teeth to preserve heritage, we should question it. There are parts of our heritage that are pulling us down, so we need to drop them. They are what our webmaster Benign0 calls cultural baggage, which only serves to burden Filipinos and obstruct development and prosperity.

Cultural preservation or anything like it best not be given government support or funding. Private entities can do a good job of that anyway, and they likely have more money for it. And cultures and heritages are private things, and supporting them with a government initiative opens them to politicization.

Preserving heritage is not an obligation or duty. It is a cultural choice. Cultures are supposed to be in flux and change. Resisting that is usually done by vested interests, under the pretension of societal betterment. It is better to let heritages come and go, as trying to preserve them delays the inevitable anyway.

3 Replies to “Holding on to Heritage Causes rather than Solves our Country’s Problems”

  1. We have different ideologies, beliefs and rules for ourselves, including cultural and tribal traits. There are Conservatives in us. There are Liberal minded people. And , there are Centrists. If you don’t know your ideology; you are too ignorant and don’t know where you stand.

    Conservatives want to preserve, old ways, old traditions, old culture, old habits, and all that has been with us for many years. It works for them, so they preserve them. Old religion, like Christianity, Islam, etc…must not be removed from their lives…including old habits and family traditions. Sex after marriages, for the “Maria Clara type”…

    If you are liberal minded person. You want to try new things. Such as new belief, new cultures, new ways of life. Progressive Liberalism is the belief of radical things; like : no borders globalism; abortion even during the time of birth ( late term abortion); same sex marriages; euthanasia( assisted suicide); living together without marriage; socialism where everything is provided by the state. Communism is progressive liberalism…

    Centrist people are in the middle. If conservatism works for them they become conservatives. If Liberalism is attractive to them. They become Liberals.

    In our country, politicians don’t have political ideologies. Their ideology are : greed, instant wealth, and power. So, we have the “padrino system” in politics; the “culture of corruption” , and politicians change parties, whoever is in power…Our politicians stands only and only for themselves and their own welfare…

    So, you can determine where you stand for your own good and the good of the whole !

  2. ” Even things done for the sake of heritage and patriotism can be misguided. For example, look at old “fake news” that say Flores invented the fluorescent lamp, a Filipino invented the lunar rover and a Filipino named Armando Lite inventing the M-16 or Armalite. All these hoaxes have the purpose of glorifying the Filipino, but they do it through lies.”

    The bola is actually part of our heritage and national character. KSP is the root of all evil. We don’t accomplish much abroad in many areas. So let’s seek out attention. Not that it helps.

  3. Reagan is a total megafaggot that turned California blue, axed the fairness act allowing media collusion and corruption, and lead to the disintegration and atomization of America that Trump is thankfully trying to fix.

    To use him as proof of anything other than your retarded brain dead goober is utterly laughable and proves why you nu intellectuals are hated by anyone who can actually think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.