The DAP is a product of PNoy’s flawed understanding of the government’s financial position in 2010


noynoy_aquinoThe thing with trying to pitch purported good intentions is that once the resources and the means to deliver those intentions have been tainted in the public eye, there is little hope for redemption. Malacañang, true to form always five steps behind when it comes to justifying its position on many matters of national consequence, has belatedly taken on the issue of why legislators (who are supposed to be spending their days legislating rather than executing) have a say in the way public funds are spent to begin with. Seemingly stammering through her explanation, deputy presidential spokesperson Abigail Valte issued the presidential message of the day (which, by the way, was in “agreement” with Senate President Franklin Drilon’s view) thus…

“At least at face value, you could see that [senators requesting for funds coming from the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP)] identified projects that fell under the implementing agencies,” Valte said in an interview over State-run dzRB.

While there were inputs from the legislators, the agencies were the ones that executed the projects, Valte said.

“The implementing agencies were still in charge of making sure that the projects were implemented,’’ she said.

And so we ask why these “senators” are entitled to their royal say on matters of how the disposal of public funds will be prioritised? Well that’s just the way it is. Filipinos do not seem to appreciate the real reason why Congress exists in the first place. If we are, for the sake of discussion, to take the whole principle behind their existence at face value, we’d take it as gospel truth that it takes 24 senators and hundreds of House “representatives” to ensure that the Philippines’ legal framework is kept up to par and that every aspect of how Congress operates is geared towards the aid of their foremost mission — legislation.

So Valte’s “clarification” is beside the point. The real points that she really needs to clarify are as follows:

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

(1) Why do the “recommendations” of “Senators Alan Peter Cayetano, Ralph Recto, Antonio Trillanes IV, Teofisto Guingona III, Sergio Osmeña III and now retired Sen. Francis Pangilinan” hold so much sway in Malacañang’s decisions surrounding how a bundle of money in “government savings” is spent?

(2) According to Drilon, “What is important is that these funds are used for the infrastructure projects so requested by the senators.” But why? Why is it so important that that senators be consulted when it comes to prioritising infrastructure projects?

Indeed, what is really noteworthy is the whole reason behind why there was so much “government savings” to begin with in 2011 and why the disbursement of these excess funds needed to be “accelerated”. It is because following his ascent to power, one of the things President Benigno Simeon “BS” Aquino III did was to dismantle many projects started during the term of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. Interestingly, the way BS Aquino described the budget he supposedly inherited from Arroyo in his first State of the Nation Address in 2010 was that it was “depleted”.

So we asked back in July of 2010, How exactly does one “deplete” a budget?? Even back then, it was quite evident that BS Aquino was not receiving competent advise from his henchmen…

In accounting there are many concepts that describe outgoing funds, and just as many words to articulate these concepts: spent, disbursed, appropriated, accrued, allocated, provisioned, etc. Choosing the right word to use among those examples basically comes down to deciding whether funds referred to were set aside or moved to or from one account to another. A “budget” does not necessarily imply the existence of actual money. A budget is planned expenditure, and as such, the concept of a depleted budget does not make sense.

The fit of hysterics Malacanang went through over this ill-advised understanding of the government’s financial position resulted in a vindictive orgy of project and contract termination in subsequent months.

It was later found that these assertions about how GMA had plundered the national budget were unfounded and severely compromised the credibility of Aquino’s fiscal management team. Nevertheless, the government did underspend in the following year in 2011 which resulted in a marked drop in economic growth

In 2011, the Philippines’ GDP slowed to 3.9 percent from the 7.6 percent growth in 2010, partly due to government underspending.

The economy could have grown by 0.8 percentage points more last year if the government was able to spend as planned.

The damage caused by President BS Aquino’s flawed understanding of his own government’s financial position in 2010 is suffered by millions of Filipinos today. Included in this furious purge was 1.9 billion pesos worth of flood control projects that perhaps could have saved Metro Manila from its slow death-by-flooding today.

[Photo courtesy Jerry Ocampo.]

I digress a bit there. The real point we need to appreciate here is that the DAP itself is a child of President BS Aquino’s own incompetent vindictiveness — that very same vindictiveness that, it seems also drove him (if the allegations are true) to use money from the DAP to, shall we say, “motivate” certain senators to deliver his preferred verdict in the 2012 impeachment trial of former Chief Justice Renato Corona.

In short: Why is there a DAP to begin with? Because President BS Aquino axed Arroyo’s projects in what seemed to be a monumental presidential tantrum in 2010. Why is Manila flooded two to three weeks in every month, every month? Because almost Php2 billion “saved” by BS Aquino in 2010 would have funded a lot of flood control projects.

And that is the Filipino’s lot in life on this planet. They get their hard-earned money taxed, which then gets stolen by the leaders they elected, and then they end up neck-deep in sewage-laced floodwaters for their trouble.

6 Replies to “The DAP is a product of PNoy’s flawed understanding of the government’s financial position in 2010”

  1. It is surprising why these Senators are very much interested in the disbursement of funds. Most of the Senators are not. Something, fishy on this matter. I smell some stink.
    Aquino is using the blame game, to hide his incompetence. That spokeswoman: Valte, wanted to cover the ass of her boss: Aquino.
    Peoples’ money has been spent. There is no accounting or auditing system, to trace where the money went. So, I assumed it went to the pockets of Aquino and those nosy Senators…

    1. Aquino and his yellow minions(including his moronic malacanang trolls) have indeed been using the blame game for three(3) years now.
      They keep boasting about supposed “growth” but the question is:
      Where is the growth that they are talking about?
      Why is it not felt by the general public?
      Why does the unemployment rate keep rising? and last but not the least,
      Why is malacanang wasting our money by hiring idiots to spread yellow propaganda online?

  2. Pnoy aquino aka the pork barrel king and his minions – drilon, belmonte, – his propagandists – lacierda, caradang-, and his apologists – cayetano, trillanes-, are fighting tooth and nail to ensure that bribery and corruption continues as they pursue the straight path to fiscal, legislative, judicial, and electoral dictatorship.

  3. OK, you have got to assume a few things: A) Government contracts are ‘awarded’ to ‘friends’,YES? B) these ‘friends’ are not always good at getting the ‘contracted’ work accomplished, yes?

    IF these two things are so, then dismantling the ‘friendly’ awarded contracts and finding someone else to actually do the ‘contracted’ work must be found, yes? that all takes time, and lets not forget that the newly ‘awarded’ contract is going to go to a new ‘friend’ and maybe not even get done anyway, it will just be money awarded to another ‘friend’ of the person who has just won(?) an election.

    it just can not be understated enough that: the people who run the country are flat-out stealing everything that is not nailed down. a contract awarded doesn’t mean that the actual work will ever , in fact, be done. it is just a function of the state to see that the ‘right’ friend of the newly elected official is the person who gets to run off with the pot of gold. and that is why Metro-Manure is constantly under-water, not because certain projects were cancelled. the projects would never have been completed anyway, it is just that a new ‘contractor’ to funnel the cash to the ‘friend’ of the new regime had to be found. KAPECHE, EH?

    a massive over-haul of how the SOP of the way cash is disbursed for projects needs to be found, about 20 years ago. every day that the same flawed system is allowed to continue to operate is just a waste of the people’s money and that is exactly what the people running the show want. ‘OH, yes’, they proclaim, ‘we will root out corruption and set things right! BUT this takes time’, is the familiar refrain always heard and thus the thievery continues. NOT UNTIL IT IS JUST STOPPED DEAD IN ITS TRACKS, will anything likely to change. and for that to happen the current system will need to be replaced…completely.

    until then? GOOD LUCK WITH ain’t gonna happen.

  4. DAP, or disbursement acceleration program, BWAHAHAHAH!!! sounds good, huh? For something that was just completely made up out of thin-air to act as an excuse!!!!! clever Filipino politicians, ha!

    just make shit up! and the people will believe it, BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!! it is actually hysterical, I can hear it now:”Well just tell them….DAP, u kno?”.”Yes, they are dumb as shit and will believe/tolerate anything we say or do, right?”. “OK, sounds good…DAP it is.”.

  5. TRUE Many projects being approved by the past administration of GMA were all shelved by the PNOY Administration. And 1 of them is the MRT Expannsion along Commonwealth to FAIRVIEW that it shud have been started and ongoing since 2011. But up to nowd the Contractor DMCI hasd not started it yet. Were r we going? By these kapalpakan of the ADMINISTRATION / MALACANAG

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.