One of my favourite movies of the 1980’s is the film 2010. It is the sequel to the classic Stanley Kubrick film 2001: A Space Odyssey which ended with its lead character Dave Bowman uttering the words “My God, it’s full of stars”. If I recall right, those words were said as he approached that big black alien monolith that he, his crew, and the self-aware computer HAL-9000 were sent to investigate aboard their interplanetary space ship the U.S.S. Discovery. I’ve seen 2001. The novelty of space travel at the time the film was made is quite obvious in the way the minutiae of such things as the dynamics of moving in zero-g or the architecture of spacecraft and space stations were highlighted and focused on.
But 2010 was made during my time — 1984 to be exact (another seminal year, by the way. But that’s another story…) and the images that stuck included Roy Scheider’s character Dr. Heywood Floyd tapping away at an Apple IIc on the beach and that tense space walk from their spacecraft Leonov to the Discovery. Presumably Dr. Floyd’s using an Apple IIc in what was going to be the year of the iPhone comes from what would motivate one to drive around in a vintage Volkswagen Beetle. I dunno. Vintage cars and vintage computers? Considering I am most probably the same age today — in 2010 — as the character Dr. Floyd is in the fictitious 2010 of the movie, I’d say the nostalgia of using an Apple IIc that the makers of 2010 tried to evoke in that scene was spot-on (perhaps it may be no more than a product placement). But then in practice, I don’t see myself lugging a CRT monitor (even the small one that comes with the IIc), the Apple IIc CPU itself, plugging all the cables and then firing it up from some sort of portable power source on the beach (the IIc was strictly AC-powered). That’s a real 2010 mind at work (mine) but one also recognising the accidental foresight in a movie released in 1984 implying that Apple Computers would be at the forefront of cool 25 years later.
|SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SOCIAL COMMENTARY!|
Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Funny how science fiction (at least the popular sort) more often than not gets it wrong. For one thing, much of the gadgetry in most 1980’s sci-fi cinema features lots of flickering CRT screens. Blade Runner in particular had lots of them. They flickered all over the place and some even suffered faulty vertical-holds every now and then. In retrospect, you’d think flat screen devices would have been considered to be desirable pieces of technology that even 1980’s sci-fi writers would envision as common fixtures in the future worlds they create. Carl Sagan had a term for this sort of myopia — temporal chauvinism. Just as Victorian Era illustrators envisioned London of the 1940s abuzz with self-propelled vehicles that still resembled 19th Century horse-drawn coaches, we saw the turn-of-the-21st-Century human habitat as abuzz with flickering analogue video delivered by electron guns on phosphor screens. To our fascination with the future we apply a temporal chauvinism to pull it back into our comfort zones.
The future beyond 2010 — our current future — is likely to be one where our computing devices are even more intimately integrated into our clothing and even implanted within our bodies. Rather than have to squint at the screens of our mobile devices, we’d probably have a heads-up display built into our spectacles projecting data directly into our line of sight, a-la Terminator or, more recently, the fat humans in Wall-E (no more people looking over our shoulders at what we are doing on our mobile devices). In short, technology tends to get less conspicuous as it advances. Instead of us wearing bulky utility belts with battery packs to power the “ultramagnetic personal transcievers” strapped to our backs, today’s mobile phone is tucked away out of sight in the shirt or pants pocket of the average man-on-the-street. Considering that the average 2010 city slicker routinely carries in his shirt pocket a hundred times the computing power available to the Apollo missions, he is virtually indistinguishable from his 1969 counterpart.
Indeed, visionary technology is not necessarily good showbiz. Even relatively low-tech telephony and email gets in the way of a good drama scene. Ever notice in an episode of Boston Legal or Law and Order how people take the trouble to pop into one another’s offices to have a conversation? You can’t have that same dramatic effect enacted with a more realistic workplace scene of people having heated email exchanges over policy disputes (though You’ve Got Mail somehow pulled off a romantic comedy story on this platform). Even a telephone conversation will never be as theatrically appealing as a face-to-face dialogue between two characters in a drama show.
And that is why Roy Scheider is sitting on a beach with an Apple IIc in the 1984 movie 2010, or why Dr Bones McCoy gave Captain James Kirk a pair of “late 20th Century” stainless-steel rimmed glasses as a present in Star Trek: The Movie, or why Obi Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader would rather hack at each other with light sabers than blast away at each other from a more comfy distance with the same technology. Hi tech is bad showbiz.
benign0 is the Webmaster of GetRealPhilippines.com.
7 Replies to “2010: we should have been travelling to Jupiter by now”
“High tech is bad showbiz.”
Now there’s a concept this country totally understands.
Apparently that also goes for politics – high-tech elections is bad politics…
“Funny how science fiction (at least the popular sort) more often than not gets it wrong.”
Jules Verne just rolled over, as did Orson Welles.
1984 missed the mark, year-wise, but the message and warning of Big Brother has meaning every day of every year.
I’m astounded how often they get it right, not how often they get it wrong.
I think they got space exploration all wrong though — unless some big technology breakthrough around propulsion and its fuels is just around the corner. But considering the number of people who put their hands up for a one-way ticket to Mars, there probably is future for man colonising the planets.
I gotta agree though about the Big Brother part… Perhaps futurists have a better track record with concepts than with technologies.
Fuel for StarShip propulsion can be the: Element 156…unpenthexium…synthesized element, used by Reticulian UFOs..
I’m talking weird?…no… sir…
We have to understand first…about Universes and Multiveses…Dimensions and Levels…before, we can understand space Travel…we have to go beyond the Speed of Light…if we dare to reach Saturn or other Planets in our Solar System…Fuel and Starship design are also problems…
Humanity is more likely to wipe itself out of existence on its own planet before it will actually seriously consider exploring others.
With that in mind, the fact that we have come close to actually doing the former means the possibility of the latter happening within any of our own lifetimes is slim-and-none.