Philippine Elections will stop being a sham when voters wisen up

Filipinos can only stand back and watch in awe at how the Americans conduct their successful Presidential election. Less than a day after the US Presidential election, the winner could be declared without a hitch and without much contention from the losing candidate. Months of campaigning from both candidates come to an abrupt halt as soon as the winner is announced. It is back to work for everyone in the White House.

The ease with which the US election sailed by so smoothly is not even because they have a computerized voting system. For many decades, US elections have always come and gone with hardly any drama. It’s just another walk in the park for people who follow a system that works. In relative terms, there’s hardly any cheating that would cause the sorts of delays that could put entire institutions in doubt.

In contrast, even the Philippines’ very first computerized election in 2010 was fraught with allegations of fraudulent activities as reported by some of the members of the local and international community who participated and observed the election.

As mentioned in my previous article immediately after the 2010 election, foreign observers concluded that there was massive cheating involved in the first ever-automated Presidential election. Apart from the problems encountered with the machines, there were other elements whose presence was questionable considering they should not have been in the polling stations in the first place. Observers witnessed a chaotic scene with strong military presence and lots of instances of intimidation in and around the polling stations.

One international observer who was assigned at the Pampanga and Tarlac region even specifically mentioned that intimidation was rampant in Hacienda Luisita, the hometown of President Benigno Simeon “BS” Aquino. These were observations made by outsiders who are completely unbiased. It is incomprehensible why our public officials allow these things to happen. This is why until now there are still some people who question the legitimacy of President BS Aquino’s win.

The following is a summary of their observation all throughout the country:

Serious and systematic irregularities:

– Vote buying
– People lining up outside the candidate’s house waiting to receive cash or goods
– There was no privacy in the polling stations
– People could see what the voter is writing
– The ballot sheet could not be folded to cover the information
– There were voters who were not stamped with indelible ink
– There were voters who were stamped with ink before voting
– There were people taking pictures and videos of voters for intimidation purposes
– Police and military presence was strong.

Despite reports of massive election fraud, majority of Filipinos don’t seem inclined to do or don’t even want to know anything about them. The Commissions on Elections (Comelec) and President BS Aquino’s media cohorts were quick to declare the election a success. They wanted everyone to think that the first automated voting system delivered as expected and that Aquino’s win was a decisive one.

Unfortunately, we will never know the truth. Filipinos will always be in the dark as to what truly happened because they chose to ignore boring details. Filipinos have this tendency to just listen to what the Philippine media is telling them. The Filipino people’s preference for turning a blind eye to impropriety is what’s preventing our country from moving forward. It is turning the Philippines into a nation of cheaters. The irony is that we cry foul after a bad deed is done but we ignore the deed as it transpires. It seems we don’t want the inconvenience of having to deal with the fallout of reporting a crime in progress.

We don’t even have protection for whistleblowers. Instead of commending people for their bravery in coming forward, Filipinos turn against the whistleblowers, making them look like they are making mountains out of molehills. People who are seen supporting the whistleblowers are considered “sore losers”. This discourages people from doing the right thing. Vigilance against crime is what will actually foster an environment of trust in our society. If we know that illegal activities are not tolerated, we can be assured that people will be honest with their day-to-day activities.

Sadly, we shun people who go out on a limb to expose corruption or any form of malpractice, but what we need to do is to help promote a society in which it is possible to speak out without reprisal about corruption, dangers to the public and environment, and other vital social issues. Until we change the way we think and do things collectively as a people, we will never have a smooth election like the Americans.

Here are some of the lessons I learned during the 2010 election that could help us in the 2013 Senatorial election and even the 2016 Presidential election:

1. Campaign platforms

No one comes up with a credible platform during elections because voters don’t care about platforms. They cared about Noynoy’s love life and what he does in his spare time.

Voters were also smitten with the “Aquino Legacy” and are convinced that Noynoy will continue whatever it is they think that Ninoy or Cory could have achieved but for whatever reason did not. The voters don’t even have a clue what a platform is. You have to wonder now how they plan to evaluate how Noynoy sticks to his campaign promises during his term of office.

Lesson learned: Most Filipino voters are star-struck ignoramuses. If you want to run for the presidency in 2016, get an image makeover or try to appear “good” and “humble”.

2. Surveys and Polling firms

Some Filipinos were dumb enough to think that if a candidate is popular, it means that he should be voted in as president. The fact of the matter is, candidates with a lot funds can hire polling firms and publish reports when it is favorable to them. It was also reported that polling firms conducting the surveys in 2010 were closely linked to the presidential candidate leading the polls. Likewise, despite the number of candidates allowed to run, people were actually just choosing between two candidates.

Lesson learned: Next election, call for more transparency around poll survey questionnaires; clamor for more polling firms to conduct surveys and be vigilant and critical of Media’s interpretation of the poll results.

3. Media Bias

Noynoy Aquino was given more exposure by prominent media outlets like the Philippine Daily Inquirer during the campaign period. It didn’t matter how trivial the news was; Noynoy Aquino was always on the front page. Broadcast networks such as ABS-CBN also helped expose Noynoy to the masa through shows that flagged the “Aquino Legacy”.

Lesson learned: Media outlets owned and operated by members of the Philippine oligarchy will give more exposure to whoever presidential candidate offers concessions they can benefit from.

4. Religious endorsements

A week before Election Day, the leader of Iglesia ni Cristo announced that they will be endorsing presidential candidate Noynoy Aquino. It has been said that this religious group actually waits for the last minute before announcing their endorsement because they want to ensure that whoever they endorse actually wins — presumably with the aim of making a few deals with the president once in office. It was also said that Noynoy’s party was secretly courting that leader’s guarantee that the INC votes will be in their favor.

Lesson learned: The endorsement of religious leaders depends on which candidate is popular; religious leaders can make or break a presidential aspirant; Filipinos will vote for whoever their religious leaders instruct them to vote for.

5. Election Day thugs and vote buying

It seems that all of the above exercise with the possible exception of item number four will have no bearing on Election Day to the majority of voters because of the presence of thugs in the polling stations. As previously mentioned, police and military personnel who have no business being in polling stations and who are under the payroll of candidates, hang around to intimidate voters. If the Police and the military themselves are involved in this illegal behavior, to whom can the voters report the irregularity to?

The illegal activity called vote buying involves the buyer and the seller. They both are accountable for their actions. In this case, both parties won’t be willing to report each other because they both benefit from the activity. Unfortunately, the voter who sells his vote will only benefit in the short term.

Lesson learned: As long as irregularities like this happens on Election Day, any efforts at educating the voters will just go down the drain.

6. Automated Machines

It turns out that automated machines are not foolproof. Reports abound of machines malfunctioning, machines found kept in someone’s shed, the discrepancies in time lapsed, and allegations of malicious software installed in the machine itself.

Lesson learned: Filipinos cannot be trusted with both manual and automated election. Filipinos are very resourceful at finding a way to cheat.

Lastly, here is the bottom-line: Filipinos are ultimately to blame for allowing fraudulent activities to happen. Politicians will keep trying to get away with cheating but it is up to us to decide if we will let them.


Post Author: Ilda

In life, things are not always what they seem.

Leave a Reply

31 Comments on "Philippine Elections will stop being a sham when voters wisen up"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Ken Morrison
Once again a great article which addresses the apathy that I seem to be finding and experiencing in this culture which is really sad. Even when it comes to National and local laws folks seem to see them as suggestions and from my experience choose to ignore them regardless if they can be prosecuted for violating them or not and this is due to the law being poorly enforced or not enforced at all. This apathy seems to run deep in this culture and perhaps the more folks like yourself write about different social, political and economic situations and circumstances… Read more »
Alvin Lizada

Very well said.

Natsu Yeung

even when the elections are not yet over we can see the maturity of the candidates– a loss is a loss and they concede accordingly. Do most of our candidates concede accordingly? No, they complain accordingly.

Thomas Jefferson

You could add COMELEC double standards in approving or disqualifying partylists. Take the case of the ANAD Partylist. ANAD is an anti-communist partylist that exposes the evils of Maoist communism. They have a lot of marginalized followers and supporters who reject the cause of the CPP-NPA-NDF and its legal support fronts. Mr. Sixto Brilliantes recently disqualified ANAD while he continues favoring legal support fronts of the CPP-NPA-NDF. Representative Jun Alcover will appeal his case before the Supreme Court.

Thomas Jefferson

It is all about people like Grace Padaca. From the Manila Standard:


That will be the days when pigs fly.


*day….Nice article Ilda 🙂


“Filipinos are very resourceful at finding a way to cheat.”

Cheating. It’s More FUN in the Philippines


What we have is a feudal system masquerading as a democracy. Elections only serve to give feudal lords a semblance of legitimacy. Despotic regimes also hold “elections” to legitimize their stay in power. The 2010 Philippine general elections showed that the voting patterns didn’t change at all. The technology advanced but not the people.

Hyden Toro

The U.S. has no Hocus PCOS….Padacain na naman tayong lahat, kasama ni Aquino at Binay…


Of presidents and stooges

Obama works to stop US going over a fiscal cliff

Hu jintao warns that growing inequality must not take china over a social cliff

P-noy drives philippine democracy to the edge of a political cliff


AbNoy is, thus far, the end-result of the triumph of all that is shameful, dirty, & twisted in pinoy politics over genuine decency, excellence, & the common good. This is all thanks to both the soulless opportunists supporting (and benefitting from) AbNoy’s presidency and the utter foolishness of those starstruck ignoramuses who left it to ABS-CBN & other media personalities to do the thinking and decision-making for them.


Immature Conduct of Philippine politics and the general attitude of mostly of us is like the schools bullies and then complicated by the irresponsible parents as it happens lately.

What is happening with our election process is a direct reflection of our nasty attitude in competition. It is called sportmanship.


Good and well written summary.

The underlying and overriding question is what type of society does the philippines want to be, and what type of society is this administration trying to create. The 2 would seem to be almost diammetrically opposed with the govt hypocritically saying one thing to calm the masses, but in practice doing another.

On the spectrum
Open or closed
Individualism or collectivism
Democracy or autocracy
Inclusive or exclusive
Progressive or repressive.


[…] I am quoting from an article made by Ilda: In contrast, even the Philippines’ very first computerized election in 2010 was fraught with allegations of fraudulent activities as reported by some of the members of the local and international community who participated and observed the election. […]


[…] Filipinos know that there is something wrong but they are so damn afraid to speak about it. They all know that our elections are a sham, still they ignorant, thanks to media. People. we must stop electing clowns like this Senator into public office. He only deserves the […]


“Lesson learned: Filipinos cannot be trusted with both manual and automated election. Filipinos are very resourceful at finding a way to cheat.”

Does that mean, hypothetically, that Filipinos and elections cannot mix? Since Filipinos have a tendency to game the system, what would they do if the system ceased to be. Back to the hypothetical, what if elections that are hopelessly easy to manipulate are abolished?


Irrelevant point as there are few choices when it comes to candidates. All of them basically have the same economic policies.

The same goes for many other countries.


what will happen if half of the percentage of the voters in the future are members of bl0c-voting religions like the INC and the rest?

We’re still going to have elections but it will no longer make sense.

MArk JOn
Hi Ilda, I have some news that you might be interested of writing about. It’s about the Iglesia Ni Cristo leadership. I currently reside in Seattle, WA. Whenever I wanted to hear unbiased news about a certain topic I tuned in by reading blogs at GetRealPhilippines. I am not sure if you still remember me, we did have some exchange of ideas in the past regarding the INC charity walks that took place after the typhoon Yolanda. Anyway, here is the scoop. If you think that this is news worthy I encourage you or your colleagues to write about it.… Read more »