One of the burning issues today is… literally, cities like Paris burning. The cover story is that they are protesting inadequacies in education. But really, should that be any reason to riot? I more believe the claim that lax immigration policies opened the door – deliberately – for many criminally-behaved people to wreak havoc as they are doing now.
Before these riots raising questions on lax immigration, there was the murder of Henry Nowak in the United Kingdom. Next is the daycare center fraud case in Minnesota that led to the recent violent and sometimes fatal confrontations between ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agents and leftist activists. Another is the rash of illegal migrants that tried to cross from Morocco into the Spanish-controlled city of Ceuta, but were driven out by the locals. And the latest, is the rioting, not only in Paris, but also in Italy, Argentina, Spain, India, Portugal, Albania, and Belgium. I wonder, did someone turn on a switch to get people rioting in an instant?
Failure of Multiculturalism
| SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SOCIAL COMMENTARY! Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider! Learn more |
One of the official reasons for lax immigration is the pursuit of multiculturalism. I would describe this as the project of deliberately collecting people of different cultures in one place and making them get along to bring about unity and world peace. It ties in with equally criticized Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. However, instead of helping people get along, it instead opened more opportunities for miscreants to commit violent acts against the host countries.
I read comments from years ago saying multiculturalism has failed. I now join those ranks. Multiculturalism supporters fail to realize that just bringing people together doesn’t automatically make them get along. But continuing this naivete is the claim that, give it some time, the hiccups (riots) are part of the experiment, it’ll work soon enough. However, it looks like the crime and violence perpetrated by “immigrants” (and leftists) doesn’t seem to show signs of letting up – and it won’t let up if committing violence was after all the purpose of bringing them in.
Multiculturalism is doomed to fail because it tolerates the problems of tribalism and backwardness. Immigrants who keep such mentalities are less likely to accept the ways of their host country; they even oppose their host countries’ ways and try to force their own. And that is tantamount to an invasion. This kind of thing is the subject of the novel The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail.
The Destruction Agenda of the Radical Left
I’ve seen posts trying to debunk the idea that the French riots this 2026 mostly involve immigrants. But a video showing a French woman trying to dissuade looters from targeting her store also shows the faces of the looters: they’re mostly colored. It’s hard to not infer that they’re not native to France.
And, of course, radical leftists are the usual suspects for being instigators of the riots. It’s been reported that Hodei Docampo Ciarra, a known leftist who’s included in a terror watch list, is the main suspect of the burning of the Limoges Town Hall in France. So it’s no surprise if leftists are behind riots in the other countries mentioned, as well as for the earlier push to bring in these “immigrants.”
In the ICE incidents, leftists campaign for immigrants to go scot-free in the US, even when the immigrants commit heinous crimes. Renee Good, the woman killed by ICE in the US, was one such activist. And I’m sure these riot-supporting leftists have an interest in seeing shops looted and businesses closed because they are part of “evil” capitalism. They are the post-Marxists I talked about earlier, “woke” people with ties to communist organizations in the US, Black Lives Matter, and other instigator groups, and they are likely behind riots in previous times, such in Los Angeles in 1992 and Minneapolis in 2020. They lend credence to the idea that drastic loosening of immigration was to aid in the destruction of western societies.
The One World Government Conspiracy
I believe multiculturalism is part of initiatives to impose a world government. And this isn’t a new idea. I first heard about it from early Worldwide Church of God literature and its TV program. However, that wasn’t a human project; the right kind of world government was to be established in the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. And I believe a real supernatural deity is the only power capable to actually enacting a successful world government. Secular efforts to create a world government, such as the communist one, tend to be flawed and violent. They are inversions of theocracy.
One world government sounds good because of the unity goal. But it’s made up of imperfect people who are corruptible. In fact, I believe they seek the power of world government in order to destroy people who disagree with them or who they can’t control. But even if they are honestly seeking world peace, they will fail because human efforts are fallible and imperfect. Secular efforts will always be plagued by corruption and malice.
Meanwhile, radical leftists have already infiltrated or inserted their bad ideas into some world organizations. For example, I mentioned that Herbert Marcuse is quoted in the UNESCO document titled “Knowledge-driven actions: transforming higher education for global sustainability.” However, his kind of “transformation” is likely to benefit no one. All he wants is free stuff, free food, free sex, free anything, etc., without any consequence, but that would actually lead to a terrible, morally decrepit world. And he wanted to bring about his free stuff by “revolution” or violence – which is happening now.
Another disturbing observation is the apparent lameness of state reactions to the riots. The Youtube Channel Romanian Tvee commented on how governments cracked down on more meaningful protests, such as the trucker protests in Canada during the pandemic and the Two Tier Kier thing in the UK. But the same governments seem to be flaccid towards the recent leftist violent protests. French President Macron was reported to have been attending a Celine Dion concert just as the riots were going on. Perhaps Romanian Tvee’s theory that allowing the riots are for helping secure reconstruction contracts for friends of government officials holds much water.
The Folly of the Philosophical Dialectic
I’ve also heard that the current multiculturalist policies and the world government goal are an application of the Dialectic principles of GWF Hegel. To recap his ideas, Hegel believed that you should force things to fight or conflict, or at least mash opposites together in order to come up with something better. Looking at the riots under this lens, the idea is to bring conflicting people of different cultures together so that out of it comes a better culture with unity and peace. If that seems contradictory, Hegel has gobbledygook to answer that: contradictions will automatically resolve without trying to fix them. However, that is magical thinking. Also, this means the dialectic way, as I explained before, does not care about the lives and rights of people.
I described something like this in my article about the real New World Order. The Council of World Religions believes that religions should be mashed together in order to come up with the ultimate or perfect religion. In multiculturalism, people are to be forced together so that they could come up with the most wonderful culture yet. It sounds good… but this is not how things work.
Can you mix diesel and gasoline to produce a new fuel? No, The result will ruin the engine. Can you mix mediocrity and excellence to form something better? No, they are opposites. Can you mix a plane and a helicopter to make a perfect flying vehicle? No, the result would be a compromise.
But here’s perhaps the best analogy yet that explains how terrible Hegel’s Dialectic is. I remember a co-worker told a story during his Citizen Army Training days. One event was a “boodle fight” where cadets were to bring food. But it was not the ordinary boodle fight to be laid on a table for people to eat. Instead, all food had to be poured into a large pot. So imagine that: sinigang, pochero, tinola, fried foods, paksiw, and whatever they brought, all got mixed in the bowl. Did that come up with a lovely superdelicious food? No, it was a horrid mess that my co-worker got through by eating three chili peppers to mask the terrible taste.
Karens of the world “Uniting”
Do you know a house-bound mom or grandma who thinks her way is so good that she wants everyone else to follow her way, but loses it when other people refuse to “obey?” And she had a door built but then kept it locked, keeping it unused despite having made it? Or a vegan who malnourished their dog or cat with only vegetables, and who screams at and threatens you when she sees you eating a delicious stake? Or someone like the bomber in the movie “The Mad Bomber/The Police Connection),” who thinks he has the right to bomb people because their values do not conform to his?
They are not necessarily leftists, but people who are poorly informed or got hoodwinked by certain ideas, or their own conceit, and who think the world should conform to them. These are the people I believe are more likely to get behind things like secular world government and “multiculturalism.” They are easy pretty for leftists to make them into “useful idiots.” For example, the mom who decides to affirm her trans kids and scream at anyone who even respectfully disagrees and call them racists or bigots.
The Commie Chinese Connection
An example of a “world government” experiment would be Communist nations, such as China. The CCP embarked on a project to eliminate all previous Chinese cultures and replace them with its new communist culture to “unite” the country. It embarked on projects like killing birds (the Four Pests Campaign), and the Red Guard that encouraged kids to turn in their parents for termination. The result was millions dead from famine and people reverted to savages (resulting in the bad behavior of Chinese mainlanders). Communist China’s failure is the reason to keep the world decentralized. Instead of a Great Leap Forward, it was a Massive Leap back. Even if they partially embraced “capitalist” business models today, they are still suffering from the results of CCP ideological violence.
In relation to the current riots, China, in addition to Russia and Iran, is suspected of being behind these riots. That is not farfetched and the riots in the countries mentioned above likely make these devious states smile.
Secular world government or at least coercing people to be under a homogenous system is tyranny. I see sinister intent in multiculturalism not because I’m against peace and harmony, but because some are using it as a cover for their attempt to seize power. They have selfish goals that disrespect the sentiments and beliefs of others.
Taking Apart Multiculturalism Rationales
So in answer to the riots that are happening now, first, the nations that loosened immigration should tighten it again. Next, crackdowns should be done on (likely leftist) organizations that instigated and funded the riots. Then, people should stop voting radical leftist candidates and vote those who support tightening on immigration, as well as on trans medical procedures, gender ideologies, and leftist ideologies. However, I do support legal immigration for legitimate refugees, those who genuinely want to leave their backward culture, and are willing to comply with the culture and laws of their host country.
We also need to attack the bad ideas that led to all this. I am against multiculturalism because its supporting premises, like forced getting along and the philosophical dialectic, are bunk. Cultures will not meld into each other and form a new culture. Individuals, tribes, subcultures and other small groups each seek to maintain their ways and have the right to. It will not undo primitive and “undesirable” practices, because those are the practices that make their way into dialectic-created cultures. In the process of eliminating previous cultures, the results tend to be something forced and hodgepodge in nature, with no real identity or humanity in it.
The elephant in the room for is me is that multiculturalism is not really about being multicultural! It’s all about decolonization and deconstruction using a disguise. If multiculturalism is indeed based on world peace, it would respect classical liberalism, the principle that people are individuals first and have the right to pursue their individual agendas. People exist with their own unique properties, talents, interests and traits that define them and necessitate different approaches.
If multiculturalism’s actual goal is to homogenize everyone, it is not multicultural nor diverse at all. And neither is it unity. If the philosophical Dialectic basis proves true, then older cultures and religions will be destroyed in order to come up with a new one. And that new culture is expected to be leftist in nature, with no individuality and everyone being puppets or zombies of a hive mind (that is, if they thought about a replacement system).
Getting a Grip on Reality Instead of Deconstructing It
A decentralized world is not a bad one. People are different, have different needs and wants, and that’s just how things are. There is no need to change that. As I said in my Sameness Insistence article, the desire to make everyone the same can be motivated by selfishness, which is true of socialism and communism. Therefore, a world where all will be the same will be detrimental, as it tries to challenge reality.
Instead of complaining about people being divided, and coercing people into “unity,” let us accept that people are divided and learn to live with that. Since people are different and have their own needs and wants. Being “divided” is the natural state — and “divided” may just actually be a strawman word. We are not really divided but accepting our differences while seeking common ground.
I would even consider “unity” a concept hijacked by leftist ideology. They’re portraying the world under the modern western order and values as an ununited mess, and therefore oppressive. Therefore, side with them in destroying it… in other word, “unite” with them. If you don’t they’ll destroy you. That is Leftist ideology.
If cultural change is sought, multiculturalism won’t work. Change should be more organic in nature. Look for individuals within a society who promote cultural changes and give them the support they need. For example, there are members of a tribe who oppose the female circumcision, child sacrifice, and headhunting practices of their tribe. Support for initiatives to stop certain practices and initiative changes to the modern can be given. But if tribes seek to retain their barbaric ways, better limit contact with them.
I support drumming up more resistance to radical leftist ideas, work towards true restoration of decency in the world, and help more people live comfortable lives through the spreading of real modernity from western culture.
- Why The World Best Remain “Disunited” and Why Multiculturalism Fails - October 25, 2026
- Why Pride is a Bad Reaction to Oppression - June 18, 2026
- Is “Filipino Time” the same as “African Time?” - May 27, 2026