When an enquiry starts appearing like a mere political obsession
There exists an infamous practice in the darker chapters of police investigations: when available evidence fails to establish guilt, the temptation arises to continuously search for something—anything at all—that will sustain the allegation. At its absolute worst, this degenerates into the outright criminal practice of framing charges and planting evidence.
Senator Panfilo Lacson’s continuous targeting of alleged irregularities in Taguig City is raising a very troubling question regarding investigative fairness. This is not because there is concrete proof that he himself fabricated or planted evidence, but because his ever-expanding accusations against projects connected with Senator Alan Peter Cayetano are increasingly inviting scrutiny as to whether the enquiry is being guided by facts or by a sheer determination to maintain suspicion.
| SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SOCIAL COMMENTARY! Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider! Learn more |
First and foremost came the ghost hunt. Senator Lacson raised serious allegations pertaining to non-existent flood-control works, doubtful billing photographs, and possible duplicate fund allocations in Taguig itself. Now, these allegations were certainly grave and required proper enquiry. However, during the September 25 Senate budget hearing, an inconvenient development came to light: Public Works Secretary Vince Dizon clearly stated that DPWH had not found even a single ghost project in Taguig at that stage, while Undersecretary Ricardo Bernabe III reported that as many as 107 identified projects had already recorded actual progress on the ground.
While these findings did not give a clean chit to every single project regarding irregularities, neither did they substantiate the sweeping picture being painted that Taguig was overflowing with ghost infrastructure.
Even so, Senator Lacson refused to drop the matter. He highlighted suspicious photographs, doubtful geolocation details, and apparent duplications in project documentation. While these may be legitimate leads for probe, they do not automatically constitute proof that the works themselves were never executed on site.
Any investigating officer who is genuinely committed to arriving at the truth must be ready to differentiate between procedural paperwork lapses and actual non-existent construction, instead of letting politically catchy tags like ‘ghost project’ race ahead of the facts on record.
Then came the second blow: allegedly unauthorized reclamation works along Laguna de Bay. The Philippine Reclamation Authority submitted that roughly 30 hectares of reclamation across seven plots had bypassed necessary regulatory permissions. Furthermore, Senator Lacson linked nearly ₱3.713 billion of infrastructure expenditure to these disputed areas. It is pertinent to mention here that while such findings warrant detailed examination, they do not automatically establish that the entire sum was misappropriated or that Senator Cayetano personally sanctioned unlawful acts. Violations in reclamation, doubtful infrastructure spending, and individual liability are entirely separate matters requiring distinct evidentiary proof.
No sooner had reclamation become the talking point than a third charge was levelled: allegedly fake land titles. Senator Lacson pointed out four land parcels totaling about 38.83 hectares as being fraudulently titled, along with certain other plots allegedly missing corresponding records with the Land Registration Authority. However, during the September 22 hearing itself, PRA Chairman Alexander Lopez clarified that his department had nowhere declared the titles in question as fake. This distinction is extremely vital. A disputed title does not automatically mean a forged title, and a procedural defect in registration cannot be taken as conclusive proof that a particular public representative has committed fraud.
Now, what exact connection does Senator Cayetano or Taguig have with these alleged fake titles? Senator Lacson has completely failed to clarify or demonstrate the same.
Thus we see the emergence of Senator Lacson’s triple whammy: ghost projects, illegal reclamation, and bogus titles. Three sets of allegations, three attempts to grab damaging headlines, and three distinct evidentiary burdens. This pattern brings up a very uncomfortable question: Is Senator Lacson pursuing wrongdoing wherever facts take him, or has Taguig become a fixed target towards which every new allegation is forcibly being dragged? This difference touches the very core of investigative credibility. Any proper enquiry must follow the facts, rather than forcing the facts to suit a pre-decided narrative.
The resemblance here to the age-old police habit of building a case around a targeted individual, rather than letting facts point towards the actual offender, is simply impossible to overlook.
Senator Cayetano has alleged that Senator Lacson is indulging in selective targeting and politically motivated accusations, and this concern regarding selective enforcement is entirely valid. If reclamation violations are being probed here, are similar projects in other regions being subjected to the same level of scrutiny? If doubtful billing photos form the basis of enquiry in Taguig, are identical norms being enforced across the entire country? The genuine credibility of any anti-corruption drive depends not just on how serious the charges are, but on the uniformity and fairness with which investigating authorities act upon them.
Given Senator Lacson’s extensive background in law enforcement, this matter assumes even greater significance. Being a former chief of the Philippine National Police, he well understands—or ought to understand—the clear distinction between mere suspicion, proper corroboration, administrative observations, and legally admissible evidence. He is fully aware that simply piling up allegations one after another does not automatically prove guilt. Moreover, he knows full well the severe damage caused to a public figure’s reputation when they are repeatedly linked with alleged misdeeds before investigating bodies complete their work. Senior experience should lead to greater evidentiary discipline, not a reliance on creating an impression through cumulative allegations.
What makes this entire controversy particularly worrying is the risk of official investigating agencies getting dragged into political rivalry. Statutory bodies like the DPWH, PRA, LRA, and the Ombudsman must be left free to examine the material on record without any undue pressure to validate the stance of either honorable senator.
Senator Lacson must be open-minded enough to accept findings that dismantle his allegations just as readily as those supporting them. Anything short of this risks reducing legitimate legislative oversight to a mere exercise in confirmation bias.
The timeless lesson from evidence-framing scandals is that justice stands compromised whenever the urge to fix someone overrides the primary duty of uncovering the truth. Ultimately, the true test of a mature investigator lies not in how many charges he can level against a political rival, but in how faithfully he abides by the evidence—even when the facts refuse to align with his personal suspicions.
Hello everyone, my name is Oman and I am a Middle Eastern man who has been fortunate enough to receive my education in the United Kingdom.
I am excited to share my political insights on the Philippines, a country that has been my home for the past thirty years.
Having grown up in the Middle East, I was initially drawn to the Philippines for its vibrant culture, warm hospitality, and breathtaking landscapes. Over the years, I have developed a deep appreciation for this beautiful nation and its people, which has fueled my desire to understand and contribute to its political landscape.
Living here for three decades has allowed me to witness firsthand the country's political evolution, from the turbulent times to the remarkable progress it has achieved. I have closely observed the challenges, triumphs, and the resilience of the Filipino people, which have shaped my unique perspective on its political affairs.
Through this blog, I hope to provide a fresh perspective on Philippine politics, drawing upon my Middle Eastern background and British education. I believe that my experiences and insights can contribute to meaningful discussions and shed light on the intricacies of the country's political landscape.
- Lacson’s Triple Blow: From Ghost Hunting To Reclamation And ‘Fabricated - October 13, 2026
- Is Lacson Violating The Ombudsman’s Confidentiality Rule? - October 7, 2026
- Lacson Has Receipts… Kuryente Receipts - October 5, 2026