Former Ambassador and Manila Times columnist Bobi Tiglao banned by Facebook after criticising Ateneo Martial Law Museum!

Is the Ateneo de Manila Martial Law Museum so sacred as to be above any challenge to its legitimacy as an authority on what really happened over the period the late Ferdinand Marcos was president of the Philippines? Apparently so. In a tweet issued today, Manila Times columnist and former ambassador Bobi Tiglao, revealed that he had been banned by social media behemoth Facebook from posting any content, seemingly after he challenged an instructor there, a certain Miguel Paolo Rivera, on the subject.

For the first time sicne joined FB in 2010 I've been banned for posting anything. It was right after I posted several items criticizing this fake Ateneo martial law museum. True nga the Yellows control FB.

Yesterday, Tiglao posted the following query on the legitimacy of this “Martial Law Museum” on Facebook

SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SOCIAL COMMENTARY!
Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider where you can opt to receive by email our more comprehensive and in-depth free weekly newsletter GRP Mail. Consider also supporting our efforts to remain an independent channel for social commentary and insight by sponsoring us through a small donation or a monthly paid subscription.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

Public query to the Ateneo de Manila University:

Is the “Ateneo Martial Law Museum” an authorized unit of the univeristy? I know of only one Museum in the University, the Art Gallery. (I remember the Observatory also had a museum, but it isn’t open to public.) It’s irrelevant [if] this Martial Law museum is “digital’. It is using the University’s prestige as a academic institution with academic standards.

…to which neither the Ateneo nor Rivera have so far responded.

This is hardly surprising. The Ateneo has long been known to be a den of Yellowtardism (the ideology of “activists” rabidly loyal to the Aquino-Cojuangco clan). Indeed, the Ateneo has been reportedly linked to demolition campaigns against the Philippine government organised by the Yellowtards. In 2019, a series of YouTube videos dubbed “Ang Totoong Narcolist” emerged featuring a hooded figure named “Bikoy” who tagged President Rodrigo Duterte’s family in the drug trade. “Bikoy” was later unmasked and revealed to be Peter Joemel Advincula who later testified he met with a number of members of the Roman Catholic clergy as well as former Education Secretary Armin Luistro and that these meetings “centered on how to publicize a story that the President’s allies and family were linked to illegal drugs, to unseat Duterte, and to ensure the defeat of administration-backed senatorial candidates in the recently concluded elections.” In his 27th May affidavit, Advincula reportedly “claimed that [Archbishop Socrates Villegas of Lingayen-Dagupan and former head of the CBCP] was present at a meeting on Dec. 12 at the Jesuit Residence at Ateneo de Manila University.”

For its part, Facebook is policed by “fact check” partner Vera Files which is headed by Yellowtard “journalist” Ellen Tordesillas. When the “Bikoy” videos first emerged, Tordesillas was quick to blog about how the videos “look professionally done” and were “uploaded on You Tube and Facebook [under the] account of ‘Metro Balita’, which lists itself as ‘media/news company’.” A who’s who of Yellowtard “activists” and influencers followed suit to share the videos. No less than then Inquirer editor John Nery himself issued rave reviews about the “Bikoy” videos, proclaiming “THIS is the real (video) scandal” as he too shared a link to the video.

I asked around. This is as far as I can tell (a) legit, (b) solidly based, and (c) has legs; that is, is capable of sustaining prolonged public attention. It also manages to redefine 'narcolist,' to mean 'tara.' THIS is the real (video) scandal.

Tordesillas is also a staunch supporter of convicted mutineer and former Yellowtard “senator” Antonio Trillanes who Advincula later reportedly testified was among those behind the “Bikoy” job.

Advincula also said his claims were “orchestrated” by Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV and the Liberal Party, a claim immediately denied by an official official of the group and an ally of the lawmaker.

It is indeed disturbing that one single authority (or an “accredited” cabal of them) can summarily cancel content on Facebook with neither channel to challenge these cancellations nor room for the community of content publishers to police themselves. The clique of “fact-checkers” that VERA Files is part of is an inbred group within which mere beliefs are propagated and amplified and challenges to these summarily dismissed or ignored. I highlighted the bald dishonesty inherent to these cliques and the flawed logic such echo chambers produce in my article “Let us all please FACT CHECK the VERA Files ‘fact check’ on Drilon’s dozing off incident on TV!” where I point out just how crooked VERA Files‘ approach to “fact checking” really is using the Drilon dozing off incident…

It is interesting to note that VERA Files used sources from only one side of the story — that of CNN Philippines and its contracted talent Pinky Webb. It did not even manage to secure a full unedited version of the footage and used a mere “screen grab” to “prove” that Drilon was, over the course of the brief footage, reading off documents on his desk. VERA Files had no third party to corroborate the “evidence” it presents — only itself and CNN Philippines and certain parties under its payroll. It seems VERA Files could not even be bothered to take a statement from Senator Drilon himself.

Furthermore, the footage used in this “fact check” was taken directly from the published and edited version of the interview.

This leads us to wonder how many more articles and how much more information that reveals similar disturbing facts are being suppressed by “fact-checkers” like Tordesillas and her VERA Files organisation. It is indeed ironic that Tordesillas and her ilk including “activists” and “thought leaders” of today’s Philippine Opposition repeatedly remind people to be vigilant and routinely apply critical minds to the information they find on the Net. As it turns out, Tordesillas and her amigas are the biggest offenders. It’s time Filipinos think twice about the trust they put in people like her and the camps she is allied with who claim to be the “decent” mob.

You wonder then why people like Tordesillas who had been caught many times spreading disinformation gets to be “fact checker” for Facebook. Even more interesting, the Ateneo itself along with Nery, Villegas, the CBCP, and Luistro have all so far copped no consequences whatsoever for their involvement in the “Bikoy” fiasco. That Tiglao would now be banned from posting on Facebook is an outrage that needs to be highlighted and the hypocrisy of those who crown themselves authorities on all that is “decent” in the Philippines be subject to long-overdue challenge.

9 Replies to “Former Ambassador and Manila Times columnist Bobi Tiglao banned by Facebook after criticising Ateneo Martial Law Museum!”

  1. Kung sa Singapore yan ginawa, nakow. Dipa Ning Alte!
    Di na makakalabas Ng kulungan yan.
    Bka 2,000 lashes ang natanggap ng mga Hinayupak na yan…

    1. Yes, the argument is to be made that Facebook is a “private company and can do what they want…blah blah blah…” But we know you’ll cry bloody murder anyway when it happens to you or “your side.” One day either: 1) a successful lawsuit is going to stick against these “big tech” companies for their “censorship”; and / or 2) they will simply lose their relevance, and then they will rue the day they imposed their own politics on the public.

      1. only repeat offenders get blocked like this so i think we dont have the full context. usually you get multiple warnings first. i dont know what you mean by “my side” are you saying that if someone posts child pornography facebook shouldnt block? facebook makes a compelling product, anyone who doesnt like can use friendster or myspace

        1. Posting CP is one thing. Banning someone for asking questions is another.

          I forgot a 3rd possibility though, aside from getting sued to oblivion and losing relevance, laws might catch up and penalize stuff like what FB did here– political backlash for what is obviously a politically motivated act.

  2. Here’s a joke: If they can ban you in their platform, who’s to say they can’t do such a thing to your bank account? Or maybe your identity?

  3. According to the intels relayed by friends, the notorious Resbak Operatives cyberterrorist group that exploits the Report button on Facebook to take down pro-government posts is active once again. Their leader Willyn Timplado Trabajador is back and active on FB: facebook.com/authorlyn

    Funded anew, they seem to have upgraded their tools as they are now using automated means of reporting content on social media that does not align to to the Opposhition narrative.

    Same old same old. Even if your post is technically benign, they will do all means to take it down if it’s attacking the Opposhition. On the other hand, downright threatening and discriminatory content made by the Opposhition funded pages do not get penalized. That is why cesspool pages like Jover Laurio’s PAB remain on FB despite its categorically hateful content.

    e

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.