A collective outcome rather than the majority will: Why Filipinos fail at common decency

At the coffee shop where I routinely get my morning fix, customers mill around the counter in a way that often makes it difficult to distinguish those who are (a) in the process of ordering and paying, or (2) waiting for a concluded order to be served. So it is a normal and routine courtesy to politely ask: “Where do I get in line?”. The remarkable thing here is that even where a queue is not readily apparent, one actually exists. Each person just makes a mental note of who came first — and the collective outcome simply comes together in a natural way.

queue_courtesyEven where there is a physically obvious queue, such as in a supermarket with multiple checkout counters, the kind of decency that is all but alien to the Filipino mind routinely manifests itself here. Once while waiting in line for my turn to pay for a trolley full of groceries, a cashier showed up and opened a previously closed checkout counter adjacent to the one I was lined up in. The person behind me politely told me he was jumping onto that counter and invited me to go ahead of him seeing that I was, in fact and quite obviously, ahead of him in the queue we were presently in. I thanked him and we both went for the newly-opened counter. In the broader scheme of things, both of us saved a bit of time — in a way that was fair to both of us.

In the above examples, a simple criterion applies to becoming a functional member of this collective — each one only need remember his place in the queue.

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

There are many other examples of systems where general order and/or harmony emerges from a shared sense of basic courtesy amongst their participants. The above two examples illustrate systems that are simple enough so much so that it is easy to see the causal link between the outcome observed and the behaviour of individual elements within the system. In those examples, the courteous behaviour individually applied by the system participants clearly resulted in a harmonious or orderly outcome overall.

More complex systems are the same in principle — individual behaviours that follow a set of shared, albeit more complex set of rules, result in a collective outcome. The only difference is that the causal links become less readily observed as the comlexity of a system increases. The term emergent property or outcome is usually used to describe such phenomena that “mysteriously” arise from complex systems. The mind, for example, is an emergent property of the human brain — a phenomenon that is an outcome of extremely complex interactions amongst the billions of individual elements (e.g. individual neurons) within the brain. Somehow, a thinking mind happens and is kept functional as a result of those billions of massively-networked neurons firing electrical impulses at one another every single second throughout the entire life of a person.

Yet neurons by themselves are no more complex than any other cell in the body. Examining a single neuron will not in any way give us any insight on how a brain produces a mind. In the same way, the behavioural drivers of an individual person are pretty much useless when trying to predict the overall behaviour of the society in which he lives.

Following this line of reasoning, the foundation of civic culture in the Philippines can be seen as residing in the way ordinary individual Filipino citizens regard one another. If there is a general respect and trust for one another, as the thinking goes, it indicates that most individuals see themselves as having a general collective personal stake in society at large, and the overall collective in theory goes on to mature into a harmonious and prosperous society.

But what do we see in Filipino society?

Systems whose effectiveness rely on basic trust and decency often fail.

Democracy is one such system that in theory relies on the wisdom of the collective. In practice, though, it merely relies on the wisdom of the majority. There’s a big difference between the two. When we say “collective” we usually mean a collection of elements that can be regarded as a unit. On the other hand, “majority” merely refers to a section or subset of such a collection of elements.

In my simple coffee shop example, the order observed amongst the waiting customers is possible because they behave as a collective. Each customer’s individual sense of place in the queue, makes the system work. Without this shared sense of individual place, arguments or jostling may take place, and some customers may simply leave.

To generalise this observation, if the set of individual rules that makes collective behaviour possible is not shared among all elements of a system, the behaviour of the system becomes less predictable, less consistent, less rational, or at worst, utterly chaotic. Instability in such systems happen even if the majority of customers upheld the rules as long as even a minority exists that doesn’t.

Think now of a system where the majority do not behave in accordance with rules that by design are pre-requisite to an outcome expected of said system.

What is the expected outcome of “democracy” as a system of governance applied to Philippine society?

Think of this question in light of the obvious reality that the vast majority of Filipinos do not see their role in a democratic system in the same way that you and I do. It puts into proper perspective this “bewilderment” at the behaviour of, say, a House of Representatives whose members are elected by popular vote doing things perceived to be “not in the interests of their constituents”. Why be so “shocked” and “disappointed” by such an outcome? Maybe it is because we expect a body constituted by members that are products of The Vote to do the right thing year after year after year. This expectation is underpinned by a doozy of an assumption — that the Rule — or the choices — of the Majority is right.

Unfortunately the majority IS NOT necessarily the same as the collective. Specifically, the collective interests are NOT necessarily the interests perceived by the majority.

Our ability as a people to behave as a collective will not come from political solutions. It will not come from new systems of governance, nor will it come from any new “leaders” or even “heroes” stepping up to the plate. Our ability to behave as a collective — as a UNIT — will come only from deep within the fabric of our character as a people and from a shared sense of what it means to be an individual that belongs.

We have a long LONG way to go, for even in the simple task of defining what The Filipino stands for, we merely shrink back, shake our heads, and tell one another, bahala na.

10 Replies to “A collective outcome rather than the majority will: Why Filipinos fail at common decency”

  1. Unfortunately, the Neurons of our political leaders; especially Aquino,are connected to their pockets and stomachs. So, if they think…their pockets and stomachs..go into reflex action, asking to be filled…this is just my Theory…

    You can see the “each-for-himself” attitude on every Filipino, in the way they drive. Just go and observe in any intersection, on the road. Every vehicle, inching itself to go ahead. No taffic rules are observed…no care for the walking pedestrian…no care for the other drivers…no care for the passengers (“I have to earn for my family”)…no discipline…

    Observe the political leaders…they only care for themselves; not the country. So, they produce political family dynasties, to hold on their political positions…forever and ever, if they can. They steal our taxmoney;, for themselves; their family; their “kabits”; for their political agendas; etc…they want all things for themselves…

    1. 100% correct. The way Filipinos drive tells volumes about their unsurpassed egoism. Me first, fuck the rest is the motto here.

  2. Take a look at this article and see the ways people extort visitors to the country, then arrest and extort them even further….just fuckin despicable.


    WTF? Child abuse on a 28 year old? Holy Shit, can U make this shit up?
    Stay out of the Philippines if your an old guy and want youthful companions! Costa Rica is much friendlier, and only 50% more expensive.

  3. Sounds like you live in Manila, try living in the province area’s, I stood in line to get bubble gum and as soon as the guy in front of me left an older man squeezes in out of nowhere and gets his cigarettes if that wasn’t enough and elderly old squeezed in from the other side, they don’t even look at you it’s rare if the cashier will stick up and do whats right because it happens so often they are immune to the sickness.

    1. @McAlley, yes…I have seen this and almost could not believe it! The Filipino that tries to pull that shit in the wrong place in the E.U./U.S.A. could learn a very severe lesson in manners.But in the fils, “Hey…everyman for himself!” and “Woman and children last”….is how things are.
      It is a sickness, a sickness of culture that invades the mind and governs the way filipino’s act.All with zero regard for others.
      I’d like to see it done in the EU/States and see the face of the perpetrator getting schooled.

    1. I know exactly what he’s talking about, I was also standing in line at Jollibee and this lady had her daughter standing in another line she jumped lines as soon as another order spot was opened and kept her daughter in front of me. Another issue is to many friends or family members milling about the till or ordering area and blocking others. Good luck getting a decent table the good ones are taken by those that order under 200 peso’s, they sit for hours and the guy that orders for his family ends up in a conference room, Pizza Hut, it’s the new pick up joint for cheap skates, I leave in my old car and the entire parking lot if full of new vehicles but not a pnoy with enough money left over after his payments to buy a full sized pizza.

  4. During BF’s time as mayor in Marikina, passing through Marikina felt like you were in another country – Jeepneys were impossibly behaved, cars kept to their lanes, the public markets were impossibly orderly and clean. It was pleasant to walk around because the sidewalks were actually usable and clean – no beggars and vendors that’ll harass you no end, no cars hogging the sidewalks, walang amoy ihi sa bawat sulok na dadaanan.

    Now, these weren’t just simply just good traffic enforcement, good garbage collection, etc by BF. I would say that BF was able to TRANSFORM the Marikenos.

    I would attribute these to two of BF’s simple campaigns: 1) walang iskwater sa Marikina, and 2) sidewalk disciple. These 2 campaigns alone were enough to transform a probinsiatic community into one of the most awarded healthy cities in the Philippines. It brought common decency to the community. And BF did these as a politician under a democratic system. Gordon and Duterte were also able to transform, not only the towns they administered to, but also their constituents.

    Sadly now, under a different administration, Marikina is slowly regressing into the likes of its neighbor QC and Antipolo, both squatter capitals. And with the insidious incursion of squatter colonies everywhere, I’ll bet, we can say goodbye to common decency in a few more years.

  5. I lose count of how many times I wanna boof an idiot over the head when waiting for elevators in commercial buildings in this city. People could be waiting for 10 minutes only to have others who just get into the lobby walk right up to the elevator doors as if they were the only ones there. The other piss off is when they the hold elevator doors open for their friends or bosses to finish a conversation with some in the lobby. I give my piece about them not being royalty and hit the close button.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.