How Serious is the Philippines’ Educational Crisis?

Lately, the Philippines has — for a number of good reasons — enjoyed the limelight, emerging as an economic bright spot in Asia.

manila_studentsReceiving a stamp of approval from the world’s leading rating agencies, namely Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s, the country stands — in label — as a full-fledged investment-grade economy. This, at least theoretically, means the Philippines is expected to enjoy more high quality investment in greater volume at a lower cost.

Then you have the World Economic Forum’s latest competitiveness report, which firmly places the Philippines among most dynamic emerging economies, capping years of stunning leapfrog in the global rankings: Between 2009 and 2013, the Philippines jumped from the 87th to the 59th most competitive economy in the world, now featuring among top 50 economies across 33 indicators, ranging from macroeconomic environment to financial market development.

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

Yet, one of the most bizarre aspects of the Philippines’ bid for economic take-off is the seemingly inverse relationship between its glittering growth figures, on one hand, and the alarming decline in the prestige and rankings of its leading universities, on the other.

Varying development agencies, above all the Asian Development Bank (ADB), have consistently emphasized the lack of inclusive development in the country, with unemployment and poverty affecting large sections of the society. And naturally, much of the focus among development experts has shifted to the necessity of reviving the manufacturing and agricultural sector to resolve such anomaly. There has been, however, relatively scant attention paid to the country’s education crisis, which has been beset by underinvestment, declining reputation, and relative stagnation by regional standards.

But a closer look at varying economic miracles across Asia and beyond reveals the strong correlation between systematic investment in the educational sector, on one hand, and sustained economic growth, on the other. Thus, the Philippines isn’t expected to credibly feature among breakout nations, unless it also gets its education sector in order.

The Inverse Relationship

Generally, rising economic fortunes is supposed to translate into larger investments in the welfare and well-being of the citizens. After all, an expanding economic pie means the fiscal base of the government expands, citizens’ expectations about goods and services rises, and consumers can reach deeper into their pockets to raise overall quality of living.

In our highly competitive world, where trillions of dollars constantly revolve around in search of new markets and opportunities, there is always a growing pressure on up-and-coming economies to market themselves as attractive, competent and stable societies. And this means more attention is — and should be — paid to marketing the country’s main assets to a wide array of global investors and observers. No wonder, emerging economies such as China, Turkey, Brazil, Indonesia, and United Arab Emirates (UAE) have seen a steady and impressive rise in the profile and quality of their universities.

Despite growing at an average rate of six to seven percent in recent years, the Philippines, home to a number of prestigious and long-established universities such as the University of the Philippines (UP), Ateneo De Manila University (ADMU), De La Salle University (DLSU), and University of Santo Tomas (UST), has seen a pretty dramatic decline in the profile of its flagship educational institutions.

For years, the “Quartet” of UP, ADMU, DLSU and UST has consistently ranked among the world’s top 500 elite universities, with UP and ADMU comfortably featuring among Asia’s tier-1 universities. The Philippines’ grasp of the English language has been an obvious source of competitive edge over other developing countries, with UP and ADMU ranking among the world’s top 50 universities in English Language and literature.

But just as the country’s economic status has improved, ending decades of anemic growth and uncertainty, the Philippines’ leading universities struggle to maintain their global and regional presence. In 2009, for instance, ADMU ranked 234th in the world, pulling ahead of its long-time rival, UP, which ranked 262nd, in the QS Survey. This year, none of the Philippine schools featured in the Times Higher Education top 400 schools, with the QS Survey showing a similar decline.

To be fair, many of these rankings have come under attack for their supposedly flawed methodologies, while other critics have gone as far as dismissing them as advertising stunts for well-heeled institutions. On the other hand, if one looks at more stringent surveys such as the Shanghai Jiao Tong world universities rankings, which heavily relies on research output and the quality of faculty, top Philippine schools have actually been pretty absent in the list — clearly indicating the dearth of investment in building up the Research and Development (R&D) capacity of leading institutions. Therefore, what we are actually observing now is how even “softer” surveys, which heavily rely on indicators such as reputation and international faculty and students population, are expressing their dismay at Philippine universities.

The Philippines’ basic education sector has been long criticized for its inability to adequately prepare and train much of the population, forcing a draconian reform under the Aquino administration, but the country’s leading educational institutions are also paying the prize of underinvestment and lack of prioritization by both the state as well as private institutions.

The focus on capital widening, instead of capital deepening, as well as budget cuts have seen a relatively small share of the country’s GDP stretched thin among a vast network of state-owned universities, while some private schools have been criticized for prioritizing profit and advertising — anchored by high spending on popular sports such as basketball — over quality and faculty development.

An underwhelming incentive structure, from low faculty compensation rates to underinvestment in research and infrastructure, is chipping away at the Quartet’s historical prestige and status in Asia and beyond, with a limited number of international academics displaying interest in working in the country. And yet we don’t see commensurate unease among the public, neither in the mainstream media nor among policy-making circles in the country.

Meanwhile, many commentators continue to simplistically overemphasize the country’s edge in the English language, which has obviously neither been decisive in brining in high-quality investment nor ensuring sustained economic development since the country’s independence in early 20th century. And the government seems to show little interest in increasing the country’s dismal R&D funding.

The Long-Term Economic Impact

Economists and experts, including myself, have been constantly emphasizing the lopsided dynamics of the Philippines’ growth trajectory, which has been largely dependent on remittance-driven boom in low-end services, retail, and real estate. This is obviously neither inclusive nor sustainable, because the country’s growth engines are benefiting only a small population, lack economies of scale, only marginally improve labor productivity, and are highly dependent on inbound remittances from millions of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFW).

What is the solution? As mentioned earlier, the answer to the country’s legions of poor and underemployed is a robust manufacturing and agricultural foundation, which can provide stable, well-paying jobs for a large portion of the society. And this requires a much more strategic re-conceptualization of industrial and trade policy in the country.

But what is often missed in the ongoing debate over the Philippines’ economic trajectory is the necessity to revive the educational sector, especially the (leading) universities, which are crucial to producing a high-quality workforce for high-end investments from abroad. After all, in addition to infrastructure and regulatory certainty, large-scale Greenfield investments are tied to the availability of skilled labor and the capacity of the host country to absorb new technologies.

The advent of trade in chains of production has allowed countries such as Thailand and China to engage in accelerated industrialization, as major global companies relocate their production networks, capital, and technology to more cost-effective destinations among emerging economies.

For countries such as the Philippines, which seek to emulate the high-growth trajectory of more advanced emerging markets, we see not only problems in terms of regulation and infrastructure, but potentially the lack of skilled labor, specifically in engineering and science, in an event of large-scale investments by global investors across a range of higher-end industries, from manufacturing to pharmaceuticals and electronics.

Investors in high-investment destinations such as Vietnam and Indonesia are already raising concerns over the availability of skilled labor, while others are keeping their eyes on alternative destinations, which can offer a more diversified and robust labor market.

There are ongoing efforts in the Philippines to improve the educational sector as well as the universities, with leading institutions such as UP inviting private-sector participation and fostering international linkages to ramp up R&D capacity and improve infrastructure. Yet, overall spending on education are lacking in both absolute and relative terms, especially as other East Asian countries, from Singapore to China and South Korea, pull ahead in global rankings and compete for high-end investments from the developed world.

If the Philippines truly seeks to join the ranks of developed nations in coming decades, investing in its educational sector, especially its universities, is pivotal. And recent surveys should be taken more seriously, since they reflect a long-standing structural weakness in need of decisive reform. For now, it seems that the government is more focused on basic education, credit ratings, and retaining high GDP growth.

This piece was originally posted on the Huffington Post.

[Photo courtesy]

9 Replies to “How Serious is the Philippines’ Educational Crisis?”

  1. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
    Top 5 countries for number of out of school children
    1. Nigeria 10.5 million
    2. Pakistan 5.1 million
    3. Ethiopia 2.4 million
    4. India 2.3 million
    5. Philippines 1.5 million

  2. The Philippines has no industrial base, to do Research and Development, for its university graduates. This is the reason why the subjects offered in Philippine universities are: obsolete, outmoded, or irrelevant in our Information Technology age.
    If you are a graduate in any Philippine university, and pursue your studies abroad like the U.S. , Canada, etc…you have to take remedial subjects/courses to understand their technology. Universities in U.S. are funded by wealthy people; people whose have no heirs (like the late Howard Hughes); and other endowments. The government does not take all the funding.
    Also, rarely you find corruption in the funding. Unlike the Philippines, funds are first siphoned to the pockets of those high government officials, before it goes to the schools.

  3. The government has ignored education in the last 3 decades, true to their mission, keep them dumb and keep them poor. Now we are filled with trash TV filled with telenovelas and trying-hard actors and actresses. Movies/TV shows in english now have subtitles in filipino or worst, dubbed in filipino. Care to watch Spongebob talk in filipino? We have broadcaster to the likes of Igan and Mike Enriquez making it seemingly easy to make entertainment out of real issues.

    The people in power have allowed the pinoys to believe that being mentally superior makes government more corrupt, hence we have politicos feeding on this which worsens the situation. They even glamorize this idiocy which in turn sends the wrong signal to the younger generation that education is not needed for one to succeed in life.

  4. To me, it seems like there’s way too much emphasis on the “arts and humanities” when it comes to PH Universities. It’s more obvious with schools that are religiously affiliated like Ateneo and La Salle. When everyone else in the region is focusing on R&D’ing modern tech, the Philippines’ schools on the other hand would rather focus on English and Philosophy while not “worthless” per se, but inadequate if Filipinos would want to go toe to toe with their Asian neighbors.

    1. Very good points, Sheen. Like you, I was curious so I asked a President of a State University why Philippines focus was not on critical research, manufacturing and engineering.
      His answer was very direct. “All the talk about building an industrial base in the Philippines is just talk. Industrial jobs pay too well, which would drive wages up. Poverty IS THE PRIME PRODUCT of the PHILIPPINES.
      So, opportunity choices in Philippines is limited to minimum wage BPO, slave wage farmer or a “Starving Artist”. Very sad.


        What an insightful quote. This is exactly right. Poverty in the Philippines is not down to misfortune. It is carefully cultivated.

        It’s a pity teachers like this are not allowed to actually teach.

        Although, thinking about it, I wonder if the average Filipino would want to hear what this professor has to say? They’d probably have him quietly assassinated for insulting Pinoy Pride.

  5. A very compelling article, Richard. Thanks.
    It is interesting to note that while P27 Bn was allocated to PDAF for dubious uses by Legislators, the P45 Bn requested by State Colleges and Universities was denied and only P 33 Bn was budgeted, a critical shortfall of P 12 Billion for higher education.
    So while the Philippines can be rightfully proud of improved growth and new “Investment Grade” stature, Government priorities are still (and likely will remain) 3rd World.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.