Why Leila De Lima and Kim Henares should not be considered for the job of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

So who should be the next Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines? Well, considering that the whole imbroglio and ensuing circus around former top judge Renato Corona started with President Benigno “BS” Aquino’s monumental tantrum over the prospect of being sworn into office by a “midnight appointee” back in 2010, it would be the height of irony if the next Chief Justice would turn out to be another tainted by politics.

As such to even consider current Department of Justice (DOJ) Secretary Leila De Lima and current Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Commissioner Kim Henares for the job comes across as a bit off. Both of these characters were key figures in the recently-concluded impeachment trial that resulted in the removal of Corona from office.

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

Sitting on the witness stand during the trial, De Lima had, in her efforts to prove Corona’s partiality towards former President Gloria Arroyo, shown her true colours as a staunch lieutenant of President BS Aquino. De Lima’s rather narrow view on what it means to be Chief Justice revealed itself under cross examination there…

It was very uncomfortable to watch a woman of De Lima’s calibre reduced to defending her indefensible actions. The simple question asked by Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile on whether or not the Chief Justice acted alone in trying to enforce the TRO [on the DOJ’s travel ban on Arroyo] — to which De Lima replied, “The direct answer to that is no” — already reveals her untenable position. The fact that other justices are free to vote “yea” or “nay” is a testament to the freedom accorded them by the Supreme Court as an institution. And for De Lima to insinuate that the other justice’s decision can be easily swayed is an insult to the justices themselves as individuals and to the institution itself.

Henares too was just as houndish on the witness stand — behaving very much like the Aquinoist attack dog that she apparently was. During cross-examination, her giddy excitement as she trumpeted the separate initiatives she had mounted to investigate Corona’s two daughters, Ma. Carla Corona-Castillo and Ma. Czarina Corona over what she suspected were anomalous ownership of prime properties could hardly be concealed. This was after she exhibited a predisposition while on the witness stand to express her personal views on the Corona family’s financial capacity to buy such properties…

Upon cross examination by the leader of the defense team, Serafin Cuevas, Henares appeared too defensive and frustrated by questions that only warranted a simple “yes” or “no” answer. It may have been hard for Henares to respond to the questions if she were aware of the case regarding Corona but it was easy for her to form an opinion about Corona’s financial capacity.

Perhaps Henares was thinking that this rather evident loyalty to President BS Aquino and his agenda may give her career aspirations a bit of a boost. And she was probably right. This is the Philippines after all, where personal and partisan affiliations trump all else. Fortunately despite this ingrained cultural predisposition for patronage, the impropriety Henares exhibited that day (too subtle for the Filipino mind to grasp) caught the attention of Senator Joker Arroyo…

This caused Senator Arroyo to feel compelled to tell that BIR commissioner that her move might be over the top:

“Remember the question here is one of policy. We don’t want the public to think that the forces of government are being used (in) the impeachment initiated by the House of Representatives and now tossed to the Senate for trial, then another one before the BIR for some tax malfeaseance or whatever. Im not questioning any, but (I’m raising) my concern,” Arroyo said.

BIR commissioner Henares might have inadvertedly admitted that her department does not do their job properly. If they did, they would have been routinely on top of what she says are inconsistencies between the income tax and the cost of the real estate properties owned by the Coronas way before the impeachment complaint was even conceived.

The fundamental lesson of the story still stands. Two years of focused executive governance was wasted on a divisive and time-wasting fixation on removing Corona from the office of the Chief Justice. The whole exercise was premised on the notion that a man who owed favours to former President Arroyo is not fit to preside over the Supreme Court. Today as the nation decides who the next Chief Justice should be, it is quite laughable that characters like De Lima and Henares who both stand to carry that same sort of patronage baggage into the service, have emerged as the top candidates being considered for the office.

15 Replies to “Why Leila De Lima and Kim Henares should not be considered for the job of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court”

  1. for high tax payers the system is that you negotiate the tax with the officer and give a hefty ‘gift’ in exchange for the reduction.
    as an example
    tax due – 2 million
    gift – 200,000
    tax paid – 800,000

    the system stinks and so does henares who has done nothing to increase tax revenues, or prosecute the known culprits, just a few little fish for PR purposes. with 20% tax evasion it is easy to identify and prosecute but the choice is not to do.
    ferrari sold 500 cars last year and 3,000 20 million plus houses were sold.

    look at the top 500 tax payer list. it is a joke who is not on there and the claim that the 500th highest earner only gets 12 million a year.

  2. Leila De Lima is the relative of Juliet De Lima-Sison, the wife of exiled communist leader Jose Maria Sison. For reasons of national security she should not have been appointed to a high and sensitive cabinet position. If memory serves me right De Lima’s appointment was not approved by the Commission on Appointments. As a national security risk she can leak classified and sensitive information to the communists. She can also open the gates of her department and/or the government to communist infiltration.

    1. De Lima’s and other appointments were deferred recently. Dinky Soliman, Ramon Jimenez, Ramon Paje and Jesse Robredo were all bypassed.

  3. you really just wanna destroy the personalities involved. The president already said that the two of them are needed in their positions and not his choice for cj.



    1. @Nutzi Fishball

      The personalities destroyed themselves. The real truth speaks for itself. You obviously get your polluted sources from rappler. Looks like your posted links are duds. Try harder yellow Nutzi troll.

    2. Only a brainwashed idiot would take Rappler as a source. The JBC is now headed by Carpio, which is also PNoy’s lackey.

      As Der Fuhrer pointed out, those personalities destroyed themselves.

    3. Pasalamat ka, Fishball, at open-minded pa rin kami dito despite your ignorance. Kung hindi, matagal na siguro kitang na-hack; doing everything just to shut you up, you yellow troll.

  4. This is for all the yellow trolls to appreciate…

    “A member of the Judiciary must be a person of PROVEN COMPETENCE, INTEGRITY, PROBITY and INDEPENDENCE.” This simply means that hand licking puppy doggies, fabricators, railroaders, black propagandists and fakes, and those who accept without question the dictates of a co-equal body in any of the branches in democratic government need not apply. Read it well and ask BS Aquino why he wants to control the Judiciary through a puppet acting Chief Justice.

    1. Well, remember that BS Aquino’s definition of “worthy of the Judiciary” may be someone who is not associated with his enemies. To PNot, “a person of proven competence, integrity, probity, and independence”, might mean someone who does as he says without asking why.

      After all, PNoy values the Ku Klux Klan, I mean KKK more than anyone else.

      1. KKK is money-in-the-bank. And dollarized-money means only for the Ombudsman eyes (after Ombudsman gets request from Malakanyang).

  5. It’s patronage politics, in the old way. De Lima is having a sexual relation, with her Driver-Lover. She is not even married to her Driver-Lover. We don’t know, if she is divorced from her former husband. Did they ever know the term: immorality…Henares, was fired from her job. what was the cause of her firing? Did she do something stupid or illegal?
    Both are Attack Dogs of Noynoy Aquino. Who subverted our Due Process and trampled on our Bill of Rights…

  6. Only in the Philippines would two people be considered for such a significant position precisely because they are NOT qualified… just like president BS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.