Why Hong Kong’s #UmbrellaRevolution is unlikely to move Beijing

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has taken its all-too-familiar stand on the issue of unrest in Hong Kong remaining consistent with its standard approach to managing and negotiating issues of sovereignity over its territories.

“I’d like to reiterate that Hong Kong is a special administrative region (SAR) of China, and Hong Kong affairs fall entirely within China’s internal affairs,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said in a press conference.

“We urge relevant countries to be prudent in words and deeds, refrain from interfering in Hong Kong’s internal affairs in any way, and do not support the illegal activities such as the ‘Occupy Central’ nor send any wrong signal,” she said in the briefing, the transcript of which was uploaded on the foreign ministry website.

umbrella_revolution_hong_kongFair enough. Today’s Hong Kong residents just happen to be unlucky enough to have been born at the wrong time at the wrong place. Hong Kong is part of Chinese territory. The deal surrounding Hong Kong, Kowloon, and the New Territories was progressively sealed between the British Empire and China over the years since 1842 albeit under foggy circumstances considering some of the lines drawing these agreements were blurred by the onslaught of changed circumstances brought about by time.

Hong Kong’s territory was acquired from three separate treaties: the Treaty of Nanking in 1842, the Treaty of Beijing in 1860, and The Convention for the Extension of Hong Kong Territory in 1898, which gave the United Kingdom (UK) the control of Hong Kong Island, Kowloon (area south of Boundary Street), and the New Territories (area north of Boundary Street and south of the Shenzhen River, and outlying islands), respectively. Hong Kong Island and Kowloon had been ceded to the United Kingdom in perpetuity. Control over the New Territories, on the other hand, was a 99-year lease.

As the end of the term of the 99-year lease on the New Territories approached, then British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher negotiated with her counterpart in the PRC Deng Xiaoping for an extension citing the terms of the original agreements. But Deng took the view that those treaties were entered into under “unfair and unequal” terms with China, at the time, situated at the wrong end of the British Empire’s cannons. So, understandably, he then took the position that there was no room for compromise on the PRC’s stand that Hong Kong and Kowloon despite being leased “in perpetuity” under those agreements will also be subject to recovery by the PRC when the lease on the New Territories expired in 1997.

Deng was said to have told Thatcher bluntly that China could easily take Hong Kong by force, stating that “I could walk in and take the whole lot this afternoon”.

And therein at that point in recent history lies the bottom line. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can simply march in and crush the Umbrella Revolution. Tomorrow. Hong Kong may be important to China economically. But it is not, by any stretch of the imagination, irreplaceable. The Hong Kong economy accounts for only 3 percent of China’s economy. And at the rate the Chinese economy expands annually (thanks, funny enough, to the generous investments of the “free world” economies), it can simply “grow” another Hong Kong within less than a year.

The Economistexplains” (rather lamely) that, even if so, Hong Kong remains “vital” to China citing that it is an important “staging post” for equity investments in the mainland but, at the same time, admitted that “much of this money is simply passing through.”

That rosy picture is debatable at best. Regardless of where or what these “staging posts” for investment money pouring into China are, the whole world’s investment community salivates over the treasures available for the picking in the vast Chinese market. With or without Hong Kong, investors will find a way to establish their presence in the Middle Kingdom. A huge and switched-on expat and ethnic Chinese community based all over the region already serve as such alternative conduits for cash and equity inflow into the PRC. The feared mass exodus of everything Hong Kong into Singapore will simply mean that Singapore will become — what else? — the new Hong Kong. Beijing wins just the same.

Thus Beijing is unlikely to back down on its position regarding the future “autonomy” of Hong Kong. If it can take the same non-negotiable position with foreign countries such as how it does with its claims to territories in the South China Sea, certainly a rogue territory within it will be no match to the PRC’s resolve to consolidate its power over its assets. Indeed, China has long long been renowned for its ability to outstare even its most powerful foes. If Beijing will not parachute in the PLA to finish the job tomorrow, it can choose to take an equally effective approach: simply wait for the protest movement to starve to death.

Realising China’s resolve to recover Hong Kong in 1982, Thatcher warned Deng back then: “there is nothing I could do to stop you [from taking these territories by force], but the eyes of the world would now know what China is like.” Ask China if it cares. The governments of the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, et al — claimants to the contested South China Sea territories China is progressively annexing — already know the answer to that question.

[NB: Parts of this article were lifted from the Wikipedia.org article “Transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong” in a manner compliant to the terms stipulated in the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License that governs usage of content made available in this site.]

print

Post Author: benign0

benign0 is the Webmaster of GetRealPhilippines.com.

Leave a Reply

19 Comments on "Why Hong Kong’s #UmbrellaRevolution is unlikely to move Beijing"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
jarvis
Guest

But this is not a movement for autonomy, Hong Kong people just want to be able to choose their officials.

Johnny Saint
Guest
Under the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984, the United Kingdom and China both agreed Hong Kong would revert back to Chinese control in July 1997. It also specified the policies under which the city would be governed after the handover to Beijing. To-day, Hong Kong lives under the ‘one country, two systems’ principle — IT ALREADY ENJOYS A HIGH DEGREE OF AUTONOMY with regards to its domestic affairs as stated in the declaration. Foreign affairs and defence are under the purview of Beijing. This arrangement was to be maintained for 50 years after the transfer of sovereignty. Annex I of… Read more »
HongKongDong
Guest
@ Saint, you think you are so smart, don’t you? “Some quarters”? Just because you went to Wikipedia and looked up a few laws doesn’t mean you now what is happening in the streets of Hong Kong.Surely you do not. Question: When was the last time you were in Hong Kong? I’d bet you have never even been outside of the Philippines.YES? As I mentioned in the previous article’s comment sections to Benigno, I attached a link to only ONE of many that are available that are a bit more credible than the MSM (IDC if you know what the… Read more »
Johnny Saint
Guest
VERY interesting that you have to constantly convince yourself that you are correct. Even when the government in Beijing and their media mouthpieces acknowledge that the proximate trigger of this ongoing protest was the decision of the National People’s Congress to introduce a vetting procedure to screen candidates for the position of Chief Executive and to require confirmation of the election results by the central government. Undoubtedly, people protesting for democracy is something that grabs one’s attention in the US and Europe. And while the upcoming elections may not be the only reason the people of Hong Kong have taken… Read more »
HongKongDong
Guest

@Saint, I did not say that the Chinese government did not do as it did. I said the story was hi-jacked.

You can not just assume things are what you think they are Sonny, and then make completely idiotic remarks about what you THINK is meant by others as a means to support you bankrupt argument. YOU THINK you are smart, but your as dull as the shine on your sneakers….and this I KNOW !

Johnny Saint
Guest

HongKongDong — still desperately trying to convince himself he has the monopoly on truth but is sadly misunderstood by everyone around him.

HongKongDong
Guest
@ Saint, NO ,no monopoly on anything. Stated was that the Western MSM as well as Eastern MSM hijacked the original story and that what started it was far from what is being relayed out to those who weren’t there when it started. The Triple R guy knows your as confused and use,what you may think, are big words but he and I may disagree on many things but we both know your clue-less. Going to Western cinema’s these days its funny to see that all the bad guys (Movies such as ‘Equalizer’ & ‘November Man’ to name just two… Read more »
Johnny Saint
Guest

That’s correct. Dong doesn’t really have anything to do with ‘truth.’ Most of Dong’s comments consist of regurgitating specious information found on other sites out of context.

Yawn
Guest

15 year old Hong Kong kids have more balls than adult Filipinos.

Filipinos all blah blah blah and do not do anything.

HongKongDong
Guest
It is sooo bad now, in this corrupted mess of a country:failed economy, un-rivalled poverty, pollution of massive proportions etc etc … that the citizens are being urged by editorial commentators on the National stage to ‘topple the administration’. Despite these calls-to-arms Filipino’s stand , mouth agape, doing nothing but throwing paper, fucking paper!, at Secretaries of the National Cabinet. This lackadaisical attitude as well as know-it-all idiots that could never be wrong (like the idiot above that believes everything he reads in the MSM) are the exact reason a country like the Philippines continues to keep plodding along slowly… Read more »
Hyden Toro453
Guest

It will be like the “Democracy movement”, some years ago. It was crushed in Tienamen Square…the world was outraged. However, it was soon forgotten…

HongKongDong
Guest

it was not forgotten, you just remembered it.
People not willing to die in large numbers to effect change is why the Tienamen Square debacle was not avenged.

Want to know your future? Take a look at what is in your hand.

Yawn
Guest

Chinese student in Tiananmen Square stood in front of tanks.

Filipinos sit in front of the tv.

Idle
Guest

I lost my faith in humanity long time ago.

bunko
Guest

Britain, for over 150 years of administrating Hong Kong, never gave it universal suffrage.

WT
Guest

Yes, we’ve heard that UK bashing a few articles earlier.

Juan dela Cruz
Guest

Ang kaguluhan sa Hong Kong ay magandang balita para sa Pilipinas. Mas mainam na sila ang nagkakagulo kaysa nagkaka-isa. Sana sumali pa ang mga tsekwa sa Taiwan. Para free-for-all na. A cliche quote to end, ” There’s a billion more where they came from ” Muhaha.