Corona impeachment: railroaded at the start by House now rushed towards the end by Senate

On the first day back from the six-week break, Senator Judges in the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona couldn’t emphasize enough that they want to finish the trial as soon as possible. Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile even said the trial should not go beyond May 31. Another Senator, Miriam Santiago also quoted the Rules of Court and current jurisprudence handbook to stress that the Senate has the power and authority to order the parties to finish the trial on or before June 7. That sounds like a plan. It’s all well and good for everybody else except of course for the defendant, Chief Justice Corona.

Jinggoy: suddenly impatient and arrogant

Still, another Senator, Jinggoy Estrada set the irritated tone at the end of the trial by insisting that the defense is just wasting the court’s time with what he thinks are irrelevant and immaterial presentations. What the Senator wanted was for the Chief Justice to come to court and answer the allegations himself. His rationale is that if he was not hiding anything, he should be able to stand and answer the allegations against him. He was just short of saying that he had already made up his mind about the whole thing and doesn’t need or want to hear the defense side anymore. All he seems to want is the circus-like excitement that can come with having Corona in the hot seat. Most of the viewing public would want that I’m sure.

The senators and some of the prosecutors are missing the point. It seems like the real meaning of due process is completely lost to them. The defense had lined up witnesses to respond to the allegations of impropriety in some of the transactions in the purchase of some of Corona’s properties. Yes, some of the details explaining how and why perceived irregularities occurred can be daunting and meticulous. In responding to accusations that the the Bonifacio Ridge condo unit was not included in Corona’s SALN in 2006 for example, the defense had to go through the tedious process of consulting the several witnesses and obtaining the documentation that could support the fact that there was a delay in the delivery of the unit as it had to undergo repairs. In the end, the defense finally managed to convince the senate court along with the prosecutors, albeit reluctantly, to agree that there was a valid reason why the said condo unit was only included in Corona’s 2010 SALN.

It was a good outcome to the long process but it also meant that some of the other witnesses lined up who were meant to further back up Corona’s defense were not needed anymore. The defense team could not have predicted this beforehand but they were otherwise prepared to call on the witnesses had the court not been satisfied or if neither side had come to an agreement. In other words, in dismissing some of the witnesses, the senators did not have to act so arrogantly. Their testimonies are relevant and material to the allegations if the court needed more proof. Unfortunately, because some of the senators are in a hurry to finish off the trial, they come across as very dismissive and very impatient. This is causing some people to think that the senate court is not applying the same liberality they applied to the presentation of the prosecution earlier.

What ever happened to the spirit of transparency? At the beginning of the impeachment trial, the senators were all adamant that they want evidence to be presented so as to avoid a repeat of the unopened “envelope” during the impeachment of former President and convicted plunderer, Joseph “Erap” Estrada. It almost got them to the point of violating the foreign currency secrecy law and almost made them defy the temporary restraining order issued by the Supreme Court against the divulging of Corona’s alleged dollar accounts. But now the senators seems hell bent on dismissing witnesses and evidence that the defense wants to present. Some of the senators keep asking who and what else are the defense going to present because they want to know if they are still relevant. The problem is, Senator Enrile doesn’t even give the defense enough time to explain. He looked very annoyed at what he thought was a wasted day.

What looked too inconsistent was the fact that the court allowed the prosecution to waste the court’s time during their cross-examination of former Mayor Lito Atienza. The prosecution’s futile attempt to show any irregularity in the sale of the BGEI property to the City of Manila made the whole exercise utterly pointless and, as Senator Santiago said, “irrelevant” to the impeachment trial. They also wasted time trying to convince the court that Secretary Leila De Lima’s testimony for the defense is not needed anymore even after the court had already issued the subpoena.

Senators like Jinggoy Estrada were very cavalier about asking Corona to testify — as if Corona’s own words would be enough to satisfy them. Of course it won’t be. Corona’s words still need to be corroborated by other witnesses and evidence. It was very irresponsible of the Senators like Estrada to issue a challenge for Corona to appear in court to prove he wasn’t hiding anything. He should be conscious enough to realize that his statements can influence the public’s opinion. A little subtlety and tact can help this situation from getting out of hand. Senator Judges should keep their opinions to themselves until the presentation from both sides are done. If the Senators want to avoid clogging up the court with useless details, they need to sit down, shut-up and listen. They also need to tell the prosecutors to quit asking pointless and irrelevant questions too.

Indeed, in rushing the proceedings, the senators are just thinking about their own schedule and ignoring the fact that any trial should finish when all parties are satisfied, including the defendant. A man’s career and reputation hangs in the balance but the senators are more worried about their break in June. It’s too bad that Corona is becoming a victim of that all too familiar ningas kugon. In English, it simply means not finishing what they started. The reality is, it was the House of Representatives who approved this impeachment trial but they don’t seem to have the patience to see it through by the book until the end.


Post Author: Ilda

In life, things are not always what they seem.

Leave a Reply

50 Comments on "Corona impeachment: railroaded at the start by House now rushed towards the end by Senate"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of

exactly my sentiments Ilda. that is why i tweeted yesterday that the impeachment court seem to be in a hurry to convict the CJ. I feel that JPE has already made up his mind. Conviction is in the offing, God forbid.


I sympathize with the Defense Panel.

The prosecutors had their time in bumbling and fumbling during their side’s presentation, and now the defense cannot even be accorded due process and freedom to present what they believe is essential to their client’s defense. And this is so that the Legislative work can continue. Who on Earth filed a faulty case to begin with?

I understand the sentiments of Lead Defense Justice Cuevas after Estrada’s supposedly (forceful) suggestion about CJ Corona having to appear, and it irked me that SP Enrile acted the way he did.

Bill Steffen

I agree with every word of this article!! The fix is in Enriles charade has been set out for everyone to see! Enrile has been bought out!! This would have been declared a mis trial in any US Court long ago!! ABNOY, the whole world is watching!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Sa simula pa lang naman waste of time and waste of pinoy taxes ang ginawa nila. Dapat ginawa nila per article ang labanan then decision kagad before the next article, para alam natin kung need pang ipagpatuloy yung ibang article kung walang bearing. Jinggoy yesterday only showed his immaturity being a senator.

i totally agree with you, ilda, and the sentiments of the readers here. the court is being unfair to the defendant. the persecutors presented many irrelevant witnesses themselves, and the senator-judges raised a lot of irrelevant issues during their so-called 2-minute “clarificatory” questioning. Naturally, the defense is forced to address those issues. i personally don’t see any need for cj to testify because the persecutors were unable to prove anything. i agree that what the persecutors and senators want the “circus-like excitement” that will ensue when the cj appears in court. because now that it is the defense’s turn, it’s… Read more »

I have read a lot of articles in Get Real Philippines but I always anticipate those from Ilda. My reading, writing and compression skills improved because of this website. Kudos to Ilda and the GRP team 🙂


well, the circus is getting more interesting. the chief justice is finally, going out in a blaze of glory, guns firing until to the very end, with his declaration of appearing at the impeachment court to dispute, of all issues, the 10 million US dollars that he allegedly own.

Good to know I was not alone whoe sensed something from yesterday’s proceedings. If the senator judges did not want to clutter the trial with irrelevant issues, then they should have not allowed the prosecutors to do it to start with. They might be forgetting that the defense is only answering point by point all the accusations and insinuations, whether relevant or irrelevant, made by the prosecutors. The other party was given enough leeway, time and liberty even to prove their case. In the name of fairness, why not do the same for the defense? Overtime of up to 10PM… Read more »
Butch Cruz

It seems that the five week break did some miracles in the thinking of the senators. Whereas before they at least made the motions of being seen as impartial, now they have no qualms in making their allegiances known. Sad.

Domingo Arong
Ilda: Item 5 in the PREFATORY STATEMENT of CJ Corona’s Answer to the Impeachment Complaints asserts that: “many circumstances and events dating back to the election of President Aquino support the conclusion that it was he who … ordered the filing of impeachment charges to remove Chief Justice Corona.” And Item 8 of the same Statement stresses in no uncertain terms that the impeachment trial– “followed on the heels of the promulgation of the decision in Hacienda Luisita Incorporated v. Presidential Agrarian Reform Council, et al., where the Supreme Court ordered the distribution of the lands of the Hacienda… Read more »

I don’t know. But this blog would be of interest to people who want to know exactly what would be the pitfalls of CJ Corona regarding this impeachment trial.

Hyden Toro

Noynoy Aquino and the Cojuangcos still want to hold their Hacienda Luisita. We’re tired of all this ShowBiz impeachment shows. We’re tired of the YellowTard Prosecutors. We’re tired to those stupid Senators, who want to hug the limelight…for their own plans for re-elections…or for higher offices. It would be good, if they just do their jobs, and improve the economy. So that, we will not be eating “Pagpag” foods anymore…or dwell in shanty houses. To be covered up, when foreign visitors come visiting our country.



I don’t really know what to make of the senate’s actions ever since the resumption of the hearings. My educated guess was that it’s never been about “hearing straight from the horse’s mouth”, but about “running off at the mouth” by the ass-kissers in order to humiliate the CJ.

The defense did counter that CJ would appear in court only if the people who filed the complaint at the Ombudsman’s office did too, right? Then again, there’s a subtle difference between “appearance” and “testimony” that many of the people involved with the trial may miss.

Last Monday, JPE said that any issue surrounding the validity of sale of the land to the City Government of Manila is not relevant to the impeachment. Yesterday, the prosecution was very much interested to highlight the seeming irregularities attendant to the auction. I agree that there were many questions left unanswered regarding that auction sale. However, the Senate should not be so much interested on that because it is not a trial court. The important thing they should be looking at was the fact that the shares are owned by Carla which is why CJ and Mrs. Corona did… Read more »
Der Fuhrer

The trial by yellow media publicity of CJ Corona shows the kind of impeachment prosecution we have in this country. Even the ombudsman and the yellow propagandists claim that he has a huge dollar account. Many claim to have no personal knowledge and the source comes from the media.


[…] being repeatedly told that only Corona could shed light to all the allegations against him. We recall that it was even Presiding Officer Senator Juan Ponce Enrile who was impatiently dispensing earlier […]


[…] the filing of impeachment complaints against former Chief Justice Renato Corona was also allegedly railroaded at the start by the House of Representatives and then rushed towards its end by the Senate. The reason, it seems, is an alleged need to comply […]