Only charter change following the 2022 elections will see the last of plurality presidents and a more unified Philippines

Why are Filipinos so disunited thirty-five years after Ferdinand Marcos was ousted? The answer lies in part to the unanswered question of who actually won the 1986 Snap Election. Marcos claimed victory. When the RAM mounted a coup and failed at the onset, Defense Minister Juan Ponce Enrile verified the claim of the then opposition that Marcos cheated. That became the basis for the assumption of Cory Aquino to the Presidency.

Between 1986 and 2016, there were two hotly-contested elections; 1992 and 2004. Poll data shows that the Marcos camp could’ve won the 1992 election if only Imelda Marcos hadn’t run. Danding Cojuangco would win by a plurality over Fidel Ramos and Miriam Santiago. Yet Cojuangco lost in large part due to the efforts of Ramos who sent Roquito Ablan to meet with Imelda and convince her to run against Danding with whom she had a rift with.

This was repeated in 2004 again because of Joseph Estrada’s ouster by a civil-military coup in 2001. The Yellows mustered enough protests to bring down Estrada from power over perceived corruption. He was the first President impeached and tried by the Senate. The House prosecutors walked out of the trial in protest over a key ruling they lost the vote on because Estrada had the numbers. It was a foregone conclusion that he would be acquitted and the then opposition would have none of this outcome. They took to the streets for EDSA 2. Mob rule triumphed over the rule of law again. Erap’s proxy, Fernando Poe Jr (FPJ), lost the 2004 election where it was revealed that then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (GMA) was caught on tape speaking with election operator and Commission on Elections (COMELEC) Director Virgilio Garcillano. The Hello Garci scandal wasn’t enough to oust GMA but it did earn her the distinction of the most unpopular post-Marcos President.

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

Today, the rift is between those who favor the strongman Presidential style of Rodrigo Duterte over the leftist-militant-liberal ideology of today’s Opposition. The 1987 Constitution’s inherent defect allows the election of a plurality President where the losers will always say that the winner didn’t obtain a clear majority. The Yellows and Reds are basically sore losers. When the anti-Yellow politicians lost the election in 2010 with the victory of Noynoy Aquino, they cooperated with his administration. It was Aquino who pursued his personal vendetta against his political enemies by having them charged and detained on plunder raps.

The 2022 election has five declared candidates for President. This ensures another plurality President unless one of them actually garners enough votes for a majority win. This is also dependent on what the voters’ sentiments actually are; strongman rule or one that goes back to the ideology of the opposition.

The Yellows and the Reds are the cause of this political dysfunction because of their continuing refusal to entertain the idea of changing the form of government. All of this can be avoided by putting in place a run-off provision or a wholesale change to a federal parliamentary system which would allow for autonomous regions to spur development. Duterte did not act on this particular campaign promise of his but there were several attempts on the part of the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) to test the waters including the formation of an inter-agency task force.

It doesn’t help that it appears that the major power blocs supporting Duterte have gone on their own for the 2022 election cycle. Both the administration and opposition camps are in disarray with the latter having it worse because there are the camps of Vice President Leni Robredo and Manila Mayor Isko Moreno Domagoso competing for votes. It remains to be seen how the candidacy of Manny Pacquiao will pan out as he has the weakest campaign organization among the three.

I really hope that charter change will be on the agenda of either the administration bet or that of the Ping Lacson – Tito Sotto ticket if only to serve as the solution for the achievement of national unity. The Philippines’ political divisiveness has exacted a heavy toll on the country’s development because the lack of continuity has made the Philippines unattractive to foreign direct investment. The county badly needs foreign direct investments (FDIs) if it’s to bring down its level of borrowing to make up for the revenue shortfall brought about by the disruption caused by the pandemic. There is also the urgent need to amend the Constitutional provisions limiting foreign ownership of corporations and land.

5 Replies to “Only charter change following the 2022 elections will see the last of plurality presidents and a more unified Philippines”

  1. Unified Philippines is an impossiblity. And it is not just because of the archipelago or politics. Filipinos are as much divided because of religious beliefs. And while most find it easy to switch their political affiliation, that cannot be said on the worldview they are subscribed to. In fact, much of the divide in PH politics are also under the influence of various religious organizations that pull the strings.

  2. Unity cannot be forge by crafting provisions giving way to charter change. I know of no precedents culminating in national unity through constitutional reform. In fact, it might even amplify the disunity because of numerous legal obstacles lawmakers will confront on how to amend or reform the constitution.

    Unity lies not in the tinkering of the charter but in the revamping of the national character. The snap election has nothing to do with disunity for we’re already fragmented even before that. There was corruption before the snap election as well as after. Before, it was a monopoly of one family; after, the spread of iniquities were shared by privileged families. All at the realm of politics.

    Even if we’ll have charter change tomorrow with no change in the people, the same afflictions will remain in our social and political life. Corruption, cronyism, thievery, nepotism, incompetency, etc. are not constitution-based, they are character flaws within us.

    So what do we do to unite?

    Just be good citizens.

  3. Prior to Marcos era, were the people truly united at all? Reading through Philippine History, there is plethora of unfortunate parts where if not for the turncoat traitor to a certain cause, they would have probably succeeded earlier than what could have been. We’ve already been divisive even before then. What’s happening now is just another day of continuing that same history and it turns out that we never learn at all. We just repeat the same mistakes over and over and over again. We were just a group of islands that should have never been brought together, regionalism still exists (my tribe is better than yours things), barangay mentality is here to stay. We should have been left alone to be honest. What was done to us only did more damage to our so-called identity.

    Yellow and Reds whichever color they push nowadays need to go away for good but this will only happen if people stop worshipping them as if they are deities that can do no wrong.

    What’s the point of having autonomous regions when eventually they will most likely secede and declare independence? Don’t we have regions here that are autonomous? How are they doing now? Apply that to most places and Metro Manila will still come out on top while the others are left behind regardless of how developed they are now. Why not just split up? Federal parliamentary system is not very useful considering we’re just trading one type of bureaucracy for another. It’s just gonna be the same song and dance. I strongly agree on FDI’s but this only happening if a new constitution will be forged but not by a country called Philippines but by a number of micro-nations that will be born out of it. We can’t expect to be like Singapore when we are more like Indonesia except with less islands, Singapore was able to do it better because it’s a rather small place. Things could be easier to implement if things are within an arms reach. Then again, of course I can still be wrong. At the end of the day, there’s no saving this country and I totally understand why people prefer to leave. I am guessing you guys are writing these pieces from another country and are not here in the Philippines and I totally understand if you don’t even want to come back. Heck, if I had the chance, I’d get out of here too.

    Do we even have grassroots movement for the betterment of this place? I see more grassroots movement towards cancelling someone over Tulfo these days than making this place a better place. A lot of the people that now and then ruled over us were “good citizens” too but did it make this place better? I honestly don’t know what else can this country try to be better. An actual separation may make the real change everyone probably wants.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.