Blame on Marcos and, now, Duterte for the Philippines’ underdevelopment is a LIE

I keep wondering why everything that is wrong with this country is blamed on former President Ferdinand Marcos and current President Rodrigo Duterte and not the political bloc that was in power for thirty years since 1986. Marcos was in power for twenty-one. Duterte six. That’s a total of twenty-seven. You don’t need to have a PhD in any discipline to analyze what went wrong with the Philippine economy. You just need to read history and analyze the political structure.

Yet here is PhilSTAR columnist Andrew Masigan in his piece “Clarity of need and strength of intention” telling us that “the Philippines is Asia’s sick man again after electing a Chief Executive who thought that illegal drugs was our most pressing development barrier.”

The tragedy is that the Duterte administration failed to sustain the National Industrial Strategy. The manufacturing sector eroded since 2017, decelerating to 5.1 percent in 2018 and 3.2 percent in 2019 until it collapsed during the pandemic, contracting by -11.5 percent. Instead of further developing local industries to generate jobs, exports and wealth, this government relied on infrastructure spending (and other types of spending) to drive economic growth. It was the wrong prescription.

Marasigan should recall the Philippines’ economic history. The Spanish and American periods saw the Philippines producing coconut oil, abaca and sugar. These were the main exports. Manila then was the Pearl of the Orient. A trading outpost similar to Hong Kong with a large expatriate community of Europeans and Americans. It was a plantation-style economy which was nothing but a modern version of fief and serf in medieval Europe. The monarchy was the Catholic Church. What was not manufactured was imported. Was there an economic policy in place by the Commonwealth government? None. That was dictated by the American colonial masters.

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

After World War II, the Americans upped and left. But they retained parity rights for their businesses and kept their military bases. Then as now, economic activities were concentrated in Luzon. Visayan and Mindanao housed the large plantations. Politicians and the oligarchs were busy rebuilding the wealth they lost during the war. Pre-war, the Philippines had no manufacturing sector. Post-war, it was the Chinese who set-up shop to churn out was viable to be produced locally. The only time an economic and infrastructure development plan was in place was after Ferdinand Marcos was elected. Post-war, the country had to deal with a communist insurgency. By the time the 60s rolled in, it was back. Then there was the Muslim separatist rebellion. Both of these were instigated by the late former Senator Ninoy Aquino.

Marcos declared martial law and put forth an economic development policy anchored by the New Society — Ang Bagong Lipunan. Why did Marcos fail? Oil price shocks in 1973 and 1979 and the fact that the only lender of development funds was the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank (IMF-WB) which was an American-controlled institution. It didn’t help that by 1976, the US wanted Marcos out for not renewing their parity rights and shortening the US military bases agreement shortly thereafter.

Cory Aquino’s tumultuous administration was wracked by political instability, labor unrest and military adventurism. Fidel Ramos, who succeeded her, was able to restore a semblance of order. Philippines 2000 was his vision but it was rudely cut short by the Asian financial crisis of 1997. Following him was Joseph “Erap” Estrada who was ousted by the ruling power bloc despite the overwhelming support of the masses which catapulted him to the Presidency. It again fell on Gloria Macapagal Arroyo (GMA) to restore order which she did, despite the fact that she was a party to the instability to begin with.

We all know what happened in recent history. Think about it, there wasn’t enough monies in the economy in the 1950s that the Cojuangco clan had to borrow money from Manufacturers Hanover Bank to purchase Hacienda Luisita from Tabacalera. Whatever industries Filipinos and Chinese-Filipino industrialists put up, shut down during the post-Marcos period because of labor unrest triggered by leftist-militant groups identified with the Communist Party, its terrorist arm the New People’s Army, and its “legal” front the National Democratic Front (CPP-NPA-NDF). How can the economy grow when there is no power supply? After that came the high cost of power.

All of the Marcos development plans were thrown in the garbage can. No investment in infrastructure projects. Whatever projects were there was controlled by the oligarchs. Even if foreign investors wanted to come in, they were precluded by the Constitutional limitations on business ownership. This is why our economy is consumption-driven. Demand is fuelled by overseas Filipino worker (OFW) remittances and business process outsourcing (BPO) operations. We don’t export agricultural commodities because our packaging industry isn’t as modern as our ASEAN neighbors. It was only recently that a petrochemical plant was established but its output is still short for the demand.

Its convenient for people like Masigan to lay the blame on Marcos and Duterte when this is farthest from the truth. He should stick to selling popcorn which his family imports. That’s where they made their money. Popperoo. Might as well be Pooperoo given the crap he comes up with with his economic “analysis.”

9 Replies to “Blame on Marcos and, now, Duterte for the Philippines’ underdevelopment is a LIE”

  1. Philippines is so weak and 3rd world but blaming it solely on Marcos is really stupid because no post-Marcos presidents are able to make changes, not to mention the protectionist system in the 1987 constitution and laws are causing problems because people are forced to buy either local products which are often inferior or be slapped with heavy taxes when buying imported products, not to mention these restrictions are discouraging foreign investors from building businesses here. After Marcos, political vengeance became rampant which is also causing destruction to the country. Necro-politics(sympathy votes to candidates who recently lost loved ones) was also invented after Marcos era which the people or voters are also to blame for but good thing people are starting to abandoning this practice, or are they?

    The protectionist elements in Philippines is the reason why I don’t believe that Philippines supports capitalism, they claim to support capitalism but at the same time, they have extremely high degree of protectionism. Foreign investors should be allowed to own 100% of their businesses and maybe even own lands. Taxes on imported products should also be lowered because if local companies can’t compete with foreign companies, then they should close down, it’s not our fault that they’re producing inferior products and it’s not our fault that we want to buy superior products.

    Imperialism or centralization of development and progress in Metro Manila is also doing grave harm to the country and I don’t even know a high ranking official who thought of getting rid of this kind of system.

    I think the reason why the Philippine economy started to go down during Marcos era is because the Laurel-Langley Agreement expired sometime during his term. People are quick to judge him basing on the numbers but they don’t look for the causes.

  2. Blame Game, especially blaming dead people, who cannot talk back, is the easy way to escape, these so called politicians negligence and incompetence. Crooks blame dead people, to avoid being blamed, themselves…

    The Aquinos were in power, not to serve the Filipino people, but to keep their Hacienda Luisita. And to grow wealthier and wealthier, thru the control of the Philippine economy.

    We are still a feudal country…feudalism which has been abolished for many centuries ago, is still with us. So, the government we have is : “Feudal oligarchy. Most of our politicians and leaders are feudal oligarchs.

    1. Honor is almost non-existent in the country’s political system. Not only crooks blame dead people like you said, but they also rely on lazily made band-aid solutions to fix problems instead of implementing long term solutions and when those are no longer effective, they either leave the problem as is or they’re gonna suggest another lazily made band-aid solution.

      They also tend to draft bills and implement requirements without thorough research and study which often end up having ugly results.

  3. if people choose you to become a Philippines president? can you make it perfectly and Filipino people overcome poverty and economy rapid increasingly. no opposition of your plan?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.