Maria Ressa is proof that Corporate Media are no longer credible reporters of “news”

“How do you solve a problem like Maria?” This is the song the world’s Big Corporate Media organisations should be coming together to sing. Maria Ressa, CEO of the Philippines’ “social news network” Rappler has, again, given the broadcast news industry a bad name. During this year’s so-called “Global Conference on Media Freedom” held in London on Wednesday, the 10th July, Ressa found herself foot-in-mouth after jumping in out of turn headlong into a question directed to Nishant Lalwani by Ezra Levant, “Rebel Commander” of The Rebel. Lalwani is Director of Investments, Independent Media for one of the Omidyar Group companies. The Omidyar Group is a known investor in Rappler which operates in the Philippines where foreign investment in media companies is banned.

Trouble started for Ressa and Omidyar when Lalwani confirmed that Omidyar “gave money to Rappler” after Levant challenged them with the assertion that everyone in the discussion panel was “on [Omidyar’s] payroll”.

Levant had earlier raised a confronting point: How unbiased can a “media freedom” conference be given that the man behind it is billionaire media tycoon Pierre Omidyar? Ressa’s media organisation Rappler is a case-in-point. It is currently being charged by the Philippines’ Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on violations of Constitutional restrictions on foreign funding.

The first mistake Ressa made was to label Levant a “proxy for [Philippine President] Duterte” — an absolutely unfounded assertion meant to cut Levant to a size that fits her narrative and allow her to control the conversation. Ressa used an utterly dishonest tactic that, interestingly enough, many of the very same authoritarian tyrants she rails against use to bulldoze crooked concepts over their audiences. No less than Adolf Hitler, for example, used the Jews and other minorities as proxies of the “problems” his constituents were suffering.

Having proved that she is unable to field an argument that has legs to stand on independent of her personal biases, Ressa then went further to discredit an esteemed Philippine Government institution — the SEC. Ressa first carried on about “parameters” she upholds to ensure that she and her staff “control” whatever content Rappler publishes regardless of who funds or are invested in their operations. The issue is simple, as Levant points out in an interjection. “The SEC disagrees.” More to the point, “Omidyar gave up his stock,” following the SEC ruling. Ressa simply didn’t know enough to quit while she was ahead. She proceeded to admit that Rappler had received “only” $4.5 million from Omidyar.

Because she, quite simply, couldn’t stop, Ressa had unwittingly proven a big point: Big Corporate Media can never be objective as news reporters as long as they are funded using current traditional methods. The message here in this “media freedom” conference has been made quite clear. Organisations funded by traditional investors using traditional investment channels can never ever be free to operate as credible reporters of unbiased news.

Indeed, unless Big Corporate Media find a new model for funding their “news” operations, they will never regain their lost credibility in that field. Perhaps, for now, the industry should be content just delivering entertainment. Entertaining an audience, after all, does not require objectivity. In light of this, the involvement of Big Corporate Media in the “activist” scene that champions “media freedom” becomes suspect. It is no secret that the profile Big Media once enjoyed in the business of news reporting is but a pale shadow of what it once was. This loss of a virtual monopoly over reporting “news” to a mass audience is forcing the more innovative companies in the industry to reform, change tact, and adapt. But there are evidently many who are still stuck in the denial phase of this upheaval.

Clearly, Maria Ressa is one of those who continue to stubbornly cling to an old order that is fast fading. To her credit, Ressa has succeeded at one thing: making herself and Rappler the news rather than just report it. If she truly believed in the power of “the truth”, she and Rappler should have stayed in the background and let the content they publish speak for itself and stand on its own in the face of their readers’ scrutiny. Worse, as can be seen in her behaviour in this instance, her first impulse is to assert control and attempt to dominate — ironic in a conference that espouses freedom.

print

6 Comments on “Maria Ressa is proof that Corporate Media are no longer credible reporters of “news””

  1. Ezra Levant is witness to an ACTUAL case of the persecution of journalists. He covered the case of Tommy Robinson, a UK journalists who was simply covering the rape trial of some Muslims. In response, the woke, pro-Europe globalist-corporatist elements of UK decided that he was spreading “hate” and that landed him in jail. This woman, Ressa, a member of the corporation globalist elite, will never experience what actual, on-the-ground and local journalists will experience.

  2. I have issues with Ezra Levant, but in this subject, he’s pretty much damn right about Neoliberals and Neocons and their Corporate Media biases and agenda-pushing are all over the place with no little and no hint of hypocrisy when they cite “Fake News” and willingly choosing what issue to push and what story to bury. And this has been going on for more than a century. You could say the US vs Spain War that resulted in the Philippines being under the subject of the Americans as a result of “Fake News” or to be exact, Jingoism and Yellow Journalism.

  3. It’s interesting how a proxy for Omidyar – that’s Maria Ressa – muddles the issue by hurling the mud to the very institutions of the Philippine government that allow her to talk and make a fool of herself. The essence of press freedom and free expression is unwittingly embodied in Ressa’s ability to speak unrestrained, even to the point that she lies about Rappler’s corporate status. The main issue is Omidyar’s involvement in an industry that exclusively belongs to Filipinos. Omidyar, a non-Filipino company, has poured in money in Rappler. Ressa may look Filipino but in fact, she’s American. One plus one equals . . . that’s the simple equation in all of this!

  4. Maria Reesa is the personification of : Fake News, Biased Opinions and Prostituted Journalism. She was one of those unsavory characters, who “murdered Journalism” in the Philippines. Journalism is long dead and buried in the Philippines, a long time ago. When Cory Aquino used Journalists, as her propaganda media people…

    Of course, there are rich people, who are progressive liberals, who will fund these liberal and prostituted media outlets, to promote their progressive liberal political agendas. And, there will always be so called: “Fake Journalists”, who are willing to take the job.

    Maria Reesa is one of these Fake / Prostituted Journalists…the Truth is the casualty of this present trend in the progressive liberal media networks. We are lucky, we have the internet and the Information Technology materials !

  5. The PH press, and traditional media, are a gang of cruel faggots. PH Journalism is not a profession or a trade. It is a cheap catch-all for fuckoffs and misfits — a false doorway to the backside of life, a filthy piss-ridden little hole nailed off by the building inspector, but just deep enough for a wino to curl up from the sidewalk and masturbate like a chimp in a zoo-cage.

    Maria Ressa is one of all great examples of them.

  6. Congratulations are in order for Ms. Ressa. For $4,500,000.00 she has now become the highest paid “BAYARANG PUTA” in the world.

    Hope Omidyar and his shriveled up dick made good use of this expensive prostitute.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.