The plight of Manny Pacquiao proves that Philippine political chatter lacks integrity

Philippine political discourse is too noisy. This seems to be the reason why confusion and lack of perspective reigns amongst the Philippines’ chattering classes. Hardly anything gets clarified, no problems get framed properly and, as a result, all the wrong arguments win. There is a concept in communications engineering called signal-to-noise ratio. In the age of digital communications (where signals are crystal clear), the Philippine National “Debate” is like those old eight-track magnetic tape cartridges where analog signals are stored. As magnetic tape ages, the sound stored in it loses its crispness and becomes increasingly muffled. Its signal degrades to noise which is that hissing sound that grows louder with time in tape recordings.

The thing with analog recording (as what magnetic tape does) is that amplifying the signal merely amplifies the noise along with it. This is because every individual analog recording is unique to its physical recording medium. Take, the Stones’ song “Satisfaction”. Every individual vinyl record and tape recording of “Satisfaction” is a unique pattern — basically the sound of the instruments and Mick Jagger’s voice along with the randomly added — and lost — sounds resulting from the inevitable random accumulation of scratches and irregularities in the vinyl grooves into which they are etched or the effects of small changes in the magnetic properties of ferrite particles embedded in the plastic tape where it is stored. In analog recordings, once the original signal degrades as a result of changes in the physical properties of its medium, there is no way to recover that loss.

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

In digital recording, the signal is stored in the form of discrete data points — on and off states or “bits” that then gets fed into a computer, say a CD or DVD player, to decode and turn into sound. Rather than detected directly off physical recording media, the signals is generated algorithmically from recorded data that is streamed into the device. As such, digital recordings of “Satisfaction” stored in any individual medium (such as a CD or DVD) are perfectly identical to one another. The signal’s integrity is perfectly preserved.

This is why the political discourse in the Philippines — which behaves like an analog magnetic tape recording — lacks integrity. The message is dependent on the properties of its storage and transmission medium. For example, how one responds to messages about Manny Pacquiao depends on who or what is transmitting that message. The audience responds differently depending on whether the messenger is Jim Paredes, Senator JV Ejercito, Rappler, or even us humble writers at Get Real Post. Never mind that the underlying principles relevant to the message are identical. To the average participant in the political “debate”, the message is the messenger and the messenger is the message.

The integrity of political messages in the Philippines routinely gets muddled in the morass of personalities that repeat and transmit it. This is because Filipinos, as an audience, fail to anchor their efforts to comprehend and evaluate these messages on a stable platform of principles. Instead of using those principles as stable context to evaluate messages, Filipinos depend on the messengers’ theatrics and, as a result, get their comprehension faculties inundated with noise.

In the the Pacquiao example, there is a small handful of encompassing first principles that feed into any discussion about him. In fact, not only are they just principles, some can even stand as factual on their own merit:

(1) Pacquiao is a a popular boxer.

(2) Congress is where laws are crafted.

(3) Voters elected Pacquiao to Congress because they idolise him as a boxer.

(4) Pacquiao’s current performance as a legislator is substandard.

Think of every discussion about Manny Pacquiao in the context of his involvement in Philippine politics and they will all be reducible to the above four items. This is true regardless of who is discussing or what their agenda is. These principles remain stable and relevant regardless.

This is a simple but powerful example of how noise which, needless to say, is an unnecessary waste product of messaging and signal transmission processes can seriously degrade the quality of the debate. In this example, the principles are stable and indisputable. Viewed in this light, the “Manny Pacquiao issue” is, by all intents and purposes, an absolute non-issue. And yet, the Pacquiao topic utterly dominates the chatter today. That’s just a whole lotta noise. To restore integrity to the debate, one only needs to refer back to these first principles to get a bit of clarity.

2 Replies to “The plight of Manny Pacquiao proves that Philippine political chatter lacks integrity”

  1. No man can purchase his virtue too dear, for it is the only thing whose value must ever increase with the price it has cost us. Our integrity is never worth so much as when we have parted with our all to keep it.

  2. Okay, it’s digital versus analog versus tape recording versus vinyl recording. Technology will advance, in a few years; these type of recordings , and emitting of sound, for your pleasure of listening will change …

    Sound waves will be further refined, and the improvement of this form of dimension, will leap forward.

    Pacquiao lost, and Filipinos are complaining , because their “Pambansang Kamao”, was beaten in unanimous decision, thru points and headbutts Whatever had happened,,,it is his own business. Professional boxing is a big business. Selling tickets, to watch the boxing match of Pacquiao versus his opponent is a multi billion U.S. dollar business.

    Enjoy the “tsismis”… Surely , he will sell more tickets on his rematch with Horn…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.