3 ways the Philippines’ Premature Opposition is trying to stop a Binay presidency


Surely Filipinos deserve something better than the “lesser evil”. Perhaps. But the trouble is, Filipino voters and the mavens who shape their opinion do not believe so. With only a year and a half to go before the 2016 elections, only one man represents a credible bid for Philippine President by a far far margin — current Philippine Vice President Jejomar Binay. What’s an “Opposition” to do? What else, but try and stop him. Here are the three key strategies they have put in place to do just that.

(1) Trial by media.

This is the main circus act currently on-going, and it is led by an apt ringleader, mutineer-turned-‘senator’ Antionio Trillanes IV. Would the reader like me to elaborate on this further? Nah. It’s become last week’s boring news.

Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
Learn more

(2) Putting a stop to Binay’s “premature” campaign.

Un-challenged and unopposed: Vice President and top 2016 'presidentiable' Jejomar Binay

Un-challenged and unopposed: Vice President and top 2016 ‘presidentiable’ Jejomar Binay

Neal Cruz in his Inquirer column today invokes the old discredited concept of “epal campaigning” (epal is Tagalog for “grandstanding”) popularised by social media “activists” during the 2012-2013 mid-term elections, writing about how Binay is “again violating the law by town-hopping, shaking hands, and delivering speeches to gain support for himself.” He also attempts to incite action from the Philippines’ Commission on Elections (COMELEC) which supposedly applies rules on the matter of campaign governance…

I am surprised that until now the Commission on Elections has been very docile and quiet, and has not issued any warning to Binay that he may be violating its rules against premature campaigning. The Comelec should not allow itself to be made a laughingstock by Binay. It should at least warn him that he is breaking the law.

Good luck with that. The COMELEC has a tradition of being ineffectual in its mandate to “control” election candidates’ pre-election activities. But COMELEC Chairman Sixto Brillantes in a 2012 meeting with so-called “anti-epal advocates” back in who were at the time howling in protest against the same reportedly pointed out that “the [Philippine] Supreme Court decriminalized premature campaigning in a decision in November 2009.”

More to the point…

“Long-term solution is for Congress to reenact/pass a law prohibiting/punishing premature campaigning,” Brillantes said.

Too bad for Filipinos. Their “senators” seem to be busier using the resource-guzzling Senate Blue Ribbon Committee for their own ironic premature campaigning instead of underpinning the inquiries they use it as a vehicle for to implement an intelligent legislative agenda.

(3) Mounting an “Anyone BUT Binay” campaign.

This is the campaign of last resort of the emerging (or, more aptly, fragmenting) Philippine Opposition. No credible challenger to Binay’s march towards the presidency has so far been presented by the “Opposition” to the Filipino public. So what do they do? Mount a negative campaign. Indeed, this sort of attitude stands out as the single biggest proof that Philippine elections are all but intellectually bankrupt. This essentially says that the Philippines deserves a ZERO president as an “alternative” to the current leading contender — someone who Filipinos voters, back in 2010, found to be deserving of the post of Vice President of the Philippines.

What do Filipinos deserve more? A Binay presidency? Or the sort of Zero-Proposal “Opposition” we see today?

That’s up to the Vote. Recall the tired old Democracy Rocks! rhetoric of the 1980s: “the voice of the people” is what ultimately determines the future of the Philippines, its champions preached back then. Small surprise that in the forefront of the mess that is the current Philippine “Opposition” are the same characters who make up the once-mighty “Black and White Movement” (B&WM). The philosophy that underlies the noise they currently add to the national “debate” has got the same old moronic signature. Back in 2007, the B&WM were mounting a similar campaign against then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo to which I observed

Discussion has, and has always been, thick on gossip on the personal agendas and posturings of individual politicians and thin on much else. In fact, the only real objective of the campaign of the “Opposition” is no different from any other “opposition” campaign in the past. “Unity” in any Philippine “Opposition” is based and has ever only been based on a common objective of removing an incumbent.

Seven years hence and not much progress in thinking has been achieved when it comes to the business of opposing the incumbent or (in today’s case) the election favourite. Indeed, as I wrote further in 2007…

History shows that once the typical “opposition” objective (removal of an incumbent) is achieved, the lofty ideals of any “united” opposition (past and present) vaporise as well. Each moron politician that was originally part of the preceding “united opposition” then goes his/her own way to found his or her own splinter “party” and pursue their own respective personal agendas. “United” opposition parties or alliances in the Philippines are almost always unions of convenience, no more than that.

The only thing different now is that the “Opposition” is no longer opposing the incumbent. It is opposing the top contender for the next presidency. Amazing. One thing Filipinos are good at is plumbing new depths in and pushing the creative boundaries of political moronism.

The laughable irony here is how the term “Opposition” has so naturally creeped into the current political lingo to describe those who oppose Binay’s imminent 2016 presidency today. These bozos have effectively organised (or perhaps disorganised) themselves into a Premature Opposition. How apt. A Premature Opposition campaigning against a future President who is mounting a premature campaign. I might add alleged to the latter, of course. Then again, that one is no longer a crime says the Philippine Supreme Court. So I am safe from being sued for libel in that instance.

Filipinos may not deserve a Binay presidency. But they also do not deserve an idiotic Opposition that offers nothing.

9 Replies to “3 ways the Philippines’ Premature Opposition is trying to stop a Binay presidency”

  1. What can we do? The administration started out as the opposition, a job that it couldn’t do well to begin with. As the oppostion, they never had a very slim chance of coming into power–only because of dumb luck and the death of a “saint”. As the administration they did nothing but “oppose” the former administration, and now they are back to the job that they do “best” which is opposing.

    I remember back in 2010, the administration was already using the “lesser evil” argument, which eventually developed into the “daang matuwid” platform. Yes. this is what we got for choosing the “lesser evil” a government, society and economy that stagnated instead of progressing the way it was poised to do.

    Really, Filipinos should start to wean themselves away from the idea that all they deserve is a lesser evil. And politicians should just stop forcing that idea down people’s throats. Its just a stupid and pernicious idea and will get us no where.

    1. As stated by Gene Smilas from the anime Code Geass:

      “The dictatorship of one talented man is more beneficial to humanity than the democracy of the ignorant masses.”

  2. I’m for premature campaigning. For one, banning premature campaigning gives media people advantage since they can get popular exposure without being seen as premature campaigning.

    Campaigns, premature or not empowers the people to be listened by future or prospect leaders and have a voice on what these prospect leader should stand by.

    With premature campaigning, you actually see how the politican or future prospect leader how hard that person works.

  3. Well, we only have Binay right now because of his premature campaigning and being prematurely campaigned by the media. You can really never tell if he’s the all or nothing when the legal time comes. People talk about presidency but nothing about platforms. Well, nobody gets sued not meeting their promises anyway. Every Philippine head of the state ended up with a criminal case anyway. Change is gradual, they say.

  4. Well, the ombudsman can charge him with plunder. Which in my book means that his bid for presidency ain’t that credible.

  5. I Just do notlike the looks of this guy or the fact that his whole family is an elected official.
    Get rid of them all….permanently. For if you do not, nothing, absolutely nothing, will change.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.