Reports of economic growth in the Philippines as measured by its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) reaching an annualised 7.8 percent in the first quarter of the year is sending waves of optimism rippling across Philippine society. One of the centrepieces of the newly-booming economy put up by recent reports on this economic phenomenon such as that of Reuters‘s is the nation’s brand-new playground for the world’s high rollers, Solaire Resort & Casino. The $1.2 billion hotel was said to have employed 400 returning overseas foreign workers, their return made out to be “a sign of confidence” in the Philippine economy.
So is the Philippines on the path to a future that might see the sort of prosperity that long eluded it?
|SUPPORT INDEPENDENT SOCIAL COMMENTARY!|
Subscribe to our Substack community GRP Insider to receive by email our in-depth free weekly newsletter. Opt into a paid subscription and you'll get premium insider briefs and insights from us.
Subscribe to our Substack newsletter, GRP Insider!
To create a prosperous society where people are able to earn a decent living, you need an economy that is on a development trajectory that not only generates employment but generates good quality employment in a sustainable manner. For that you need a productive labour force — productive in the real sense of the term. To see productivity gains in a country’s labour sector, the value of the aggregate output of the workforce must increase vis-à-vis the aggregate cost to employ them. For an enterprise such as, say, a manufacturing company to achieve this, it should ensure that;
(1) its workers’ skills are continuously upgraded (through training and by capitalising on experience accumulated by long-term staying employees); and,
(2) it progressively upgrades the tools and equipment used by its workers.
The above two are forms of capital expansion; capital that is created in the form of (a) workers’ education and (b) improvements in the efficiency of the overall system within which they work respectively.
Note that increasing production output by employing more workers does not result in efficiency gain. It results in more employment but not necessarily an increase in output per employee. In a labour market where available jobs are mainly ones that involve low- or un-skilled work, enterprises tend to invest less on uplifting workers’ skills and upgrading their tools and equipment. This is because low- and un-skilled jobs are easily replaceable, specially in economies where an enormous labour supply vastly exceeds demand. Indeed, this is the phenomenon observed by my fellow author Corey who remains frustrated with the unimpressive way Filipino staff deliver even the simplest services in the country’s many retail chains. Many big Philippine enterprises are, in fact, mainly employment mills for low-end work invovlving highly-replaceable commodity staff.
Indeed, this was the bottomline of the Reuters report cited at the beginning of this piece…
In the latest World Competitiveness Report by the Swiss-based Institute for Management Development, the Philippines moved up five places to 43 out of 60 economies, overtaking Indonesia and India.
While it showed improvements in economic performance, and government and business efficiency measures, the gains were not accompanied by job generation. It was down seven places in employment, one notch down in overall productivity and two rungs down in labour productivity.
To be fair, this being the bottomline message of the report, it was mentioned last — after all the gushing and feel-good messages were dispensed with. Interesting, considering this is pretty much the only aspect of this much trumpeted “economic growth” that really matters to the ordinary Filipino.
That’s entertainment, so to speak.
[Photo courtesy ArabianBusiness.com.]
benign0 is the Webmaster of GetRealPhilippines.com.
4 Replies to “First Quarter 7.8% annual growth in Ph economy: The Bottom Line”
The growth figures are headline grabbing and impressive, but like the curate’s egg there are good parts and bad parts. Inevitably the focus will be on pushing the ‘good news’, whilst traditionally ignoring the ‘bad news’, which are the red flags needing to be addressed, and which will determine whether benefits accrue to just the few, or the country as a whole, and ultimately whether pnoy has egg on his face in 2/3 years time.
The main concerns as expressed by many are, firstly the sustainablity into 2014 and beyond, secondly the inability to translate headline numbers into good jobs or inclusive growth, thirdly the potential of capital flight, fourthly the extent that the growth is ‘paper’ based (jobless growth) funded largely by ‘hot money’ fuelled by a general bull market in asia and magnified in the philippines by a small stock exchange dominated by monopoly players, who unquestionably are the main and possibly sole beneficiaries through increased prices/profits with no sector competition.
Election spending has also contributed to Q1 2013 figures and will carry through to Q2 but not beyond
Analysts are viewing stocks as overpriced and many moving from ‘buy’ to ‘hold/sell’ status.
Interesting that there is a concerted publicity drive to try and persuade individuals to invest in stocks as institutions bale out, and that the govt regard the stock index as the key barometer, which clearly it isn’t.
Caveat emptor! ( buyer beware)
The underlying microeconomic figures raise specific concerns relating to the decline in exports and the slow down of the electronics assembly sector – more jobs to be lost, and in a similar vein the decline of the textile sector, and the inability/reluctance to invest in the major employer – agriculture.
Ease of loans and general confidence are fuelling an increase in consumer spending but there is still a day of reckoning to be faced and potential asset bubbles to be avoided
The high increase in construction contribution to gdp – up 32% – is interesting and somewhat perplexing since the growth isn’t reflected on the jobs side.
Maybe less emphasis should be on financial intermediaries – moving money around and more on solid private equity and venture capital for sme’s, start-ups and embryonic sectors.
No wonder I suspect a bubble. With one metric showing good growth while another shows no progress or negative growth should send a clear signal that something is wrong.
It’s just all hype without substance.
its like a ponzi scheme – promises which never materialise
You are not alone OnesimusUnbound. One of my friends who worked in a big local bank suspects and fears the same thing happening to us.