Are Filipinos REALLY offended by Duterte’s quip on how to shoot female NPA combatants?

At one level, the remark made by Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte about what part of the anatomy state forces should aim for whenever they get a female member of the New People’s Army (NPA) within their sights is deeply offensive. As the Inquirer Editor pointed out today, it is Not Funny. Mr. Editor also further adds an admonistion:

Every Filipino should feel offended.

And, in fact, they should. But the question is, will they?

For us private-school-educated folk and the cliques of social climbers who routinely tap their two cents on matters such as these into their $1500 iPads, the idea that things like these are offensive constitute the stuff we take for granted. As such, we judge the existence (or lack) of outrage in our society through the lens of our gated village upbringing and our expensive up-that-Hill education. More disturbingly, we seek comfort in the false sense that sufficient outrage on the matter exists using our small social media networks where we had, over time, curated every trace of dissenting opinion (to ours) off, as dubious evidence.

The reality is, our social networks do not serve as samples that are soundly representative of the broader Philippine population. For one, the elements of these networks are not randomly-picked (because we consciously or subconsciously curate the information it feeds us). Second, they are not a big enough sample. So any conclusion we draw from what we glean from content we see in our timelines and newsfeeds (a sample set that is skewed and too small) cannot be attributed to the behaviour or sentiments of the broader society at a high enough confidence level.

In short, it is debatable whether Filipinos are truly outraged by what Duterte said (or routinely says) and it is debatable whether what Western media say (or echo from our local media) about the matter actually matters to the average Filipino. Indeed, the fact that Duterte routinely gets away with saying such things does say something about what Filipinos really think and should prompt us to pause, take stock of, and critically evaluate the layers of assumptions we’ve piled upon the foundations of our online rhetoric of just how-deeply embedded in Philippine society Western liberal ideas really are.

Philippine society’s elites may raise big stinks about Duterte’s offensive quips but we need to challenge whether the voice of the elite at the very least resonates with ordinary Filipinos.

A starting point in that journey of inward reflection is to take stock of some facts.

(1) The Philippines is a deeply-religious society and, as such, isn’t as liberal (in the Western sense) as many “thought leaders” would like to believe.

(2) Evidence of outrage over the female NPA quip comes primarily from the social media “politically-passionate” elite and even within this elite, statistics on “trending” topics have not exhibited evidence of significant chatter surrounding this topic.

(3) Efforts from prominent “women’s issues” groups to rally Filipinos to protest this quip had thus far failed to muster the significant enough headcount in rallies to demonstrate widespread indignation.

What remains consistent is Duterte’s remarkable ability to remain popular over almost a year and a half of making deeply-offensive misogynist remarks. Traditional “civil society” and “activist” cliques of liberal-minded Catholic-school-educated elites and the corporate media firms that serve as their powerful megaphones have effectively lost their ability to influence hearts and minds in Philippine society or, at the very least, persuade Filipinos to give a shit.

A popularly-elected Philippine president who can be a misogynist with impunity in a democracy is but a mere symptom of a deeper problem if we consider that, in principle, the character of leaders in a democracy mirror the character of the electorate. Considering these confronting facts and the rather adolescent and evidently ineffectual way revered “thought leaders” go about coming to terms with the behaviour of a popular president, it is high time the Philippine Opposition think up a better and smarter strategy to go about opposing the incumbent and persuading an apathetic Philippine public to understand the offense they ought to feel.


Post Author: benign0

benign0 is the Webmaster of

Leave a Reply

20 Comments on "Are Filipinos REALLY offended by Duterte’s quip on how to shoot female NPA combatants?"

newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Dick S. O'Rosary

Media has always shown us highly misogynistic telenovelas, variety shows, noontime shows etc. Media has helped create an electorate that allowed us to elect a misogynistic president. Media should start to reconsider the kind of programming they put on TV.

William E Jackson
Fake Philippines Facts. 1. The country is not religious. It has one of the highest teen pregnancy, new STD rates, and single mother rates , and crime rates percentage wise in the entire world in the world. The fact is that behind closed doors is a different Filipino then out in the world in the open. 2. The country is more liberal than most western countries. Recently the child sex industry has grown larger here. The same answer is always accepted for the parents. The family is poor and blame the pedophiles who take advantage of this. I do not… Read more »
There’s also the fact that Gabriela is a communist legal front to extort companies, demand donations, and attack politicians for their benefit, also consider the current Winter Olympics, Olympic viewership is down for the last decade since the 2008 Beijing Olympics, you got the Western liberal media and liberal US athletes politicizing the Olympics for their benefit, they aren’t representing their country, they are representing their political views, and out of spite against the current administration that they are cheering and helping the North Korean dictatorship look good and also making it all about gay and lesbian athlete identity politics… Read more »

I dont find it offensive. A terrorist is a terrorist. I’d even recommend shooting a kid, as long as he/she’s got a live firearm in his/her hands. There are no girls in a war, only combatants.

First of all, why are those rallying females, covering their faces ? They are afraid of themselves and afraid of the government ? If our troops, are commanded by Pres. Duterte to aim and shot at the NPAs’ female soldiers private parts. It is one of the strategies in warfare. Aim at the enemies private parts and shoot ! This strategy came from the Nazi Germany’s Army in World War II. There was a Nazi German exploding mine, whereby, if you step into it; the mine will first blow off, exactly on the level of the target’s private part and… Read more »
I don’t know about others, but I cringe every time one of our politicians opens their mouth – what embarrassing, but potentially hugely damaging and thoughtless statement is coming next. Anything said to our national press obviously becomes international news, and the international community doesn’t care much about the fine details as we understand them. For example, Yolanda, horrendous of course, but just certain areas bore the full brunt, martial law is imposed in a limited area, the war on drugs, Boracay is a cesspool, etc, etc. Internationally these news items are interpreted as The Philippines as a whole –… Read more »
Con Dom
“A popularly-elected Philippine president who can be a misogynist with impunity in a democracy is but a mere symptom of a deeper problem if we consider that, in principle, the character of leaders in a democracy mirror the character of the electorate.” But the problem is what is the deeper problem? Is being popular right now the New Right and Politically Correct? I see most GRP commenters here find the President’s mouthing irregularities as being okay and just fine. They rather see those who do not as being pretentious and hypocritical (does this mean, in principle, that the misogynist character… Read more »

Oh, the wine of a woman from heaven is sent, more perfect than all that a man can invent.