As usual, the whole “debate” around the plight of the hundreds of thousands of jeepney drivers and the “threat” to their “livelihood” presented by the prospect of modernising public transport in the Philippine has taken a wrong turn. Highlighted by the usual “socially-aware” cliques of “activists” is the wellbeing of what is, essentially, a relatively smalll community of social parasites. Indeed, jeepney drivers are a parasitical class of workers. They lay waste to the streets of the Philippines’ major cities and spew corrosive fumes into their atmospheres. They don’t pay taxes like their squatter kin in these cities’ slums yet degrade precious infrastructure as they ply their parasitical “trade”.
Jeepneys are pitched to the public as some kind of “essential” public service and, as such, their drivers are supposedly entitled to be protected from people who seek to deprive them of their “livelihood”. But what they really are, in essence, is a monopolistic industrial bloc that shoves its mediocre (and, often, dangerous) “service” down Filipinos’ throats with impunity much the same way that the Philippines’ oligarch-controlled telco providers hold Filipinos hostage to appallingly primitive Internet service.
Worse, the jeepney community like the squatter community (who are, in essence, property thieves) are politicians’ vote farms. They are vast breeding grounds for non-thinking voters. This explains why jeepney drivers are virtually untouchable. They are part of a deadly trinity of untouchable Filipino social cancers: (1) drug trafficking, which is controlled by drug lords coddled by crooked politicians and prison officials, (2) squatting, wich are coddled by crooked and vote-hungry local government officials, and (3) jeepneys, which are coddled by crooked transport officials and commies who seek to overthrow the Philippine government in a bloody “revolution”.
While lots of poetry had been waxed by dimwitted “activists” about the plight of squatters, jeepney drivers, and, of late, drug traffickers (and the “awful” violation of their “human rights”), nobody champions the plight of the millions of hapless law-abiding tax-paying Filipinos who are quietly earning their keep, contributing to nation-building, and putting up with the institutionalised mediocrity of their public services. This is what true populist tyranny is. It is not one where a “tyrant” of classic 1980s yore terrorises and oppresses the public using state forces. Rather it is a tyranny of the so-called impoverished that emotionally blackmail the Catholicism-addled minds of the people of an emotionally-disturbed society.
When we begin to imagine a jeepney-free Philippines, we begin to free ourselves of the tired, old, victim narrative that has kept our society imprisoned by people who venerate mediocrity, lazy thinking, and the advocacies of the ill-informed. To be jeepney-free is to embrace systemic solutions that require modern discipline and scientific reasoning to implement and sustain.
Jeepneys represent the sad industrial culmination of Filipinos’ renowned bahala na (“come what may”) and pwede na yan (“that’ll do for now”) mentality. They are a temporary solution made permanent and allowed to imprison generations of Filipinos in abject misery. It did not spawn a modern automotive industry, hindered the development of a systematic schedule-driven mass transit system, stunted the entrepeneurial imaginations of legions of returning OFWs, and turned Manila into an urban hellhole. The time has come to put an end to the King of the Road’s reign of terror. As with most truly revolutionary proposals, it starts with imagining what it is like to be free — free of the single-biggest social cancer that has kept Filipinos in the Dark Ages for more than half a century.
- Depreciating Philippine peso could spell doom for social media “influencers” - June 18, 2018
- Philippine poverty is really a very simple problem. It really is. - June 8, 2018
- Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord God Ninoy Aquino in vain - June 6, 2018
- Filipino liberals presume to know better than people who choose NOT to be “victims” - June 5, 2018
- Rappler journalists make DISHONEST conclusions out of unsound observations - June 4, 2018