Ditch the old Aquino-vs-Marcos rhetoric: Time for the Philippines to move on!

I was in one of the high rise buildings in Ortigas and looking out of the window, could see that the volume of vehicles was again too much for the four-lane two-way traffic road. It was bumper-to-bumper traffic both ways. At one intersection, a gray Toyota Camry from the two-lane heading north was slowly attempting to make a left turn to a road heading east. The Camry effectively blocked the two lanes heading south for a good few minutes which created an empty space between the cars ahead in said lanes from those that were blocked.

The space was enough for the driver heading north in a white Ford Pick-up to think he could overtake several cars, and the Ford darted towards the intersection, an action immediately followed by several more cars, availing of the suddenly empty lane in the opposite direction. I could not see the next intersection, but it was obvious that there was also something happening there which made the cars heading north to slowdown quite a bit because the cars heading south were blocked by the Camry. By the time the Ford reached the intersection I could see, the Camry has completed its left turn, but this time, it was the Ford and the other cars that followed that were about to block one lane heading south.

If they could not merge back to the lanes heading north, a gridlock was about to ensue. And sure enough, the gridlock occurred because of the impatience of the drivers in the Ford and the cars that counterflowed. It took about 45 minutes to untangle the grid. So, instead of making up time, they also wasted the time of others with their selfish and myopic ways. Only in the Philippines, I thought to myself.

Have we become selfish and myopic after EDSA1?
The assassination of Ninoy Aquino at the tarmac made the nation think. It sure made us think on whether there was a point in pursuing the Marcos south to north road of Bagong Lipunan. We began to doubt and convinced ourselves that Marcos was no longer leading our nation to greatness again. We were trying a slow left turn to investigate if an east to west tangential road was a better path to pursue. However, emotions got the better part of us in the immediate aftermath of the tarmac, and we allowed a Ford Pick-up to dart towards the intersection of challenges. In our mad dash, we only took into consideration the attractive space of freedom and liberty, thinking that we could overtake the others who constraint themselves and stuck on the right lanes with a bumper-to-bumper patience and discipline.

cory_aquino_doy_laurel

Cory Aquino was the driver of our Pick-up truck; thereafter, there have been other drivers who have taken over her, including her very son as our driver today. Today, we seem to be still stuck in the intersection while other nations have untangled themselves from the gridlock. We have news that some of these nations have struck gold in the end whether they have pursued the east-west or the south-north roads. Maybe, it is time to admit that we have been myopic and selfish, made worse by Pinoy Pride. The irony is that we have put a premium on freedom, and yet tether ourselves to Pinoy Pride as if this was the only therapy to our inferiority complex as colonial victims. The truth is that we have been more like bridled horses in our tunnel vision, impervious to what is happening outside our unanchored floating archipelago. So, whoever is riding the horse, we follow even if the rider is leading us to a ditch??

What do we see in retrospect?

Lately, we just dashed, like the Ford Pick-up above, to host the next FIBA, but lost to China. To aspire to host a big international event, such as the Summer Olympic Games, could be something unifying. It affords a people a concrete vision to go for, a challenge to have the glory that comes with it, or the embarrassment from a disorganized event, and thus, they get interested, keep up with the news in the progress of the preparation, and get morally involved if they could not help directly, so that the country doesn’t get embarrassed.

When Seoul decided to host the Summer Olympics of 1986 in the 1970s, South Korea was no tiger economy. South Korea then could be somewhat compared to be what the Philippines is today. That could easily be pictured because the clock seem to have stopped in the Philippines to the 1980s; some Korean tourists remember that Manila, especially Makati and the Roxas Blvd/Ermita Area, then looked more progressive than any part of Seoul. According to the Koreans, if the Philippines probably continued with the initiatives and the momentum that it still had then, we probably would not be lagging as bad from them today. The respect they have for the ingenuity, creativity, flexibility and persistence of Filipinos remains for that is what we were as a people. However, visiting Metro Manila again lately, they were shocked at how Metro Manila deteriorated; it is urban planning gone awry, or an urban center with no planning at all — an urbanity turned “kabastusan” and “kababuyan”.

My Korean visitors were telling me that the 1980s was the watershed for South Korea. Seoul was practically overturned; at any one time of the several years, there was digging in practically half of the city because the subway lines were being put in. There were all sorts of business disruptions. Meantime, farmers in Kangnam, south of Seoul, were being displaced because their lands were being expropriated to give way to the large scale development of an Olympic Village. There were, of course, some complaints, but on the whole there was a sign of relief that finally the preparations were underway.

They have been dreaming of hosting the Olympics since the 1960s, the decade that Japan started exporting cars to the United States of America. The Jap cars then were still lemons and were a butt of American jokes (how times have really changed.) But, the mere fact that Japan started exporting to the US alarmed Korea. In the late 19th-, and early 20th-, century, Korea was a colony of Japan for 90 years, and during that period, the Koreans were treated very badly as second-class citizens in their own country. Koreans have not forgotten that, and the animosity between the two is deeply rooted even to this day. So an exporting Japan brought a depressing feeling, Korea needed something to uplift the national psyche.

The resounding success of Olympics 86 brought that. After the Olympics, Koreans started thinking that they were after all capable of great things. It was the decade the population started getting rid of mediocrity. It was the time to start thinking world-class. It was the time to start thinking big. The result is a Korea we see today — a country that we could never picture as myopic, not even a mile close to that.

So, I don’t know what our people were thinking bidding to host a FIBA; our love for basketball, and that is it? That is a lot of bull#*$p!!!

How do we analyze the corrupt undercurrent in our government culture?

Like Korea, the 1980s was a watershed too for the Philippines; it was the decade of the EDSA People Power Revolution, and we were so proud of it. Unlike Korea, we were not building momentum, we were changing gears. Destination? We had no idea then. All we knew is we were free of the shackles of a dictator. We obsessed over our liberty; we were bound to abuse it. What we know now is that we went headlong into being a basket case.

Several analyses have been put forward as to the WHYs. Number one in the list is the unbridled corruption to a point that some claim that our drivers in the cockpit called Malacañang, or the riders of our horses, have been more corrupt than Marcos if we consider the short term they have been in offices compared to the 20 years of Marcos. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) seems to support this, claiming that the Philippines loses 40% of its national budget to corruption, an unheard of amount during the martial law years.

Some say we are lagging because of the knee-jerk 1987 Constitution, which dissuades foreign investments; others claim it is the elimination of the two party system, or that our population has simply ballooned to over 100 million, to which I disagree. 100 million is just about the ideal domestic market size that supports all sorts of economies of scales if we have just focused our energies on strengthening our manufacturing industries, which, with 100 million customers, will not be easily subjected to the ups and downs of the export markets. But, whatever ills there are, they don’t seem to compare to the cancer, that is corruption.

But, if it is about corruption, then it is about selfishness and greed. But, I refuse to accept that we are that people. I look at myself, I look at my family, my neighbors, my colleagues and friends, my former classmates with whom I still get in touch with, and I cannot see in any of them a selfish and greedy person. And, I am sure you could say the same thing about yourselves, your family, your friends and circle of influences. So, where is this selfishness and greed coming from? Is it simply made to appear as a cancer in the system, so we would accept it as something incurable just to benefit a vicious few? How deep is this ingrained in the national psyche?

I read for the first time today Fallen Angel’s article about the BNPP, A Monument to Pinoy Stupidity the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant. I was a bit sad about it because it brought back memories of an older cousin, who had an MS in nuclear science from MIT and was very much involved in the project management of BNPP. A very young man then, he was very happy shuttling back and forth between the US and the Philippines, like it was just going back and forth between Cebu and Manila, and every time, all the cousins were quite happy with his pasalubongs. He got a Green Card to the US in 1990, and that was the last I saw him. Because of him, I think I knew then that the Philippines was going in the direction of nuclear plants even if everything surrounding the BNPP was messy — if I am not mistaken, a regulatory agency in the US even sued Westinghouse for getting involved in a deal that involved a lot of kickbacks.

But be that as it may, it never ceases to strike me like a thunderbolt every time I read that Cory Aquino may have mothballed BNPP not really on the basis of the pros and cons regarding the safety of a nuclear plants, but because it was the idea of Marcos. Gosh, that is a very, very big Cory ego — a very expensive ego to the tune of billions of dollars that Filipinos have been paying through the years, made worse by the EPIRA Law that made the energy cost in the Philippines one of the most expensive in the world, discouraging all sorts of investments in manufacturing, which in turn could have been one of the biggest generators of employment. So, the multi-level multiplier effects of that costly Cory Ego is even impossible to compute in terms of a dollar amount. If it is impossible to compute that gargantuan amount, what kind of mentality did she have? Could we say that despite her saintly demeanour, she was actually a very, very selfish individual within her deep core?

Marcoses vs Aquinos

Hanging himself from a tree, even Judas did confirm in a way that Jesus was the Good One in the process. If Judas who is portrayed as the most evil one could unwittingly generate a good idea, could Marcos be more evil than Judas and not be able to generate any good idea at all? Being the First President of the Fifth Republic of the Philippines, Cory was all about discontinuity — even there was wisdom in retaining what was good in the past while throwing away what was bad. The stone of Cory’s ego was thrown in the middle of the government lake, and a selfish ripple has been expanding in an ever widening concentric circles since then; how else could we explain that even the older politicians are today shocked by the extent and brazenness of corruption in the last 10 to 15 years both at the national and local levels? If there is one thing about PNoy’s narcissism which shrouds, and yet put into a pedestal, the mother’s selfishness, it is that he has put into our consciousness what could have remained in our subconscious.

The Aquinos have always been portrayed as being straight as arrows. But, corruption is a two-way street, the giving of bribes and the receiving. We know what PNoy did during the Corona impeachment trial; bribing legislators is not corruption? Who is worse the one who has a far-reaching agenda, or the ones who just succumbed to greed? Aren’t they just the same? Or, who is more corrupt? The Aquinos who continue to hold on to Hacienda Luisita? Or, the Marcoses who people claimed have not completely return their ill-gotten wealth? If we don’t know the exact amounts involved, who has the more corrupt mentality; the one who started crony capitalism, or the one who continues to promote patronage politics, even if they said that this was the evil of Martial Law?

One could hate a person, but it is another thing not to give an idea any chance of being analyzed just because it came from The Hated One; we would never know if we missed an opportunity, or if we could discard the idea with finality so we could move on. The Japs, for example, are known for their sushis, but this was an idea that didn’t originate in Japan; it was a Korean idea from the start. Could Cory have just named the BNPP into NCNPP, or Ninoy-Cory Nuclear Power Plant? Perhaps if she did and carried it on, we may not be paying today a very expensive electricity bill. But could you imagine a Constitution barring a people from even investigating a set of technologies like nuclear energy and garbage incinerators? What if these technologies had advanced and improved dramatically? We’ll never know now. That is what the 1987 Constitution did.

More to it, the demonization of martial law didn’t end there. Marcos, they claimed, committed some of the most atrocious human right abuses in the region. But, that is not exactly correct; Mao Zedong, Pol Pot and Suharto, individually, hold that distinction, not Marcos. In fact, Marcos was no different from Lee Kwan Yew, Mahathir, and Park Chung Hee in their methodology of suppressing the Opposition. True, one life snuffed out is one life too many, but could we at least widened our perspective that we didn’t have a unique dictator? They insist that Marcos stole the most; sorry, but again that distinction belongs to Suharto per Forbes Magazine, and Marcos was not even the longest sitting dictator; those labels belong to Suharto and LKY, who each stayed in their offices for 31 years.

Maybe, it is time to consider whether we have been victims either of Marcos Martial Law, or of Cory (and PNoy) Egos. For sure, it is time to a clearer view and widen our perspective of history, which is always good for a better national psyche. We cannot have hang-ups as other nations have moved on from their “dark ages”. We never know, but it may just be the way to move the Philippines and get out of the gridlock we are now in!!!

print

About Add

GRP Featured Comment hall-of-famer. Former executive of the Far East Regional Office of a US-based multinational company living out of a suitcase covering the market from Tokyo to Mumbai to Melbourne, and all the countries within that triangle. Got tired after logging 300k air miles per year. Now, I just have a little trading biz on specialty chemicals.

11 Comments on “Ditch the old Aquino-vs-Marcos rhetoric: Time for the Philippines to move on!”

  1. The Japanese cars were lemons (“madaling masira”)…then,an American; Dr. Demings, PhD., who was experimenting with Statistical Process Control (SPC), went to Japan, to introduce his SPC process, to the Japanese manufacturers. The Japanese accepted it, and the rest is history.

    The U.S. car manufacturers, rejected Dr. Deming’s SPC. It is too hard to follow, and cost a lot of retooling. They just wanted to produce cars; good or bad; to sell to consumers.

    Until their Japanese competitors, started exporting their cars to the U.S. Japanese cars lasted, to more than 300,000 miles in use; before they go to the junkyard. U.S. cars lasted only about 120,000 miles in use.

    The Aquinos’ wanted to demonize Marcos, who is long dead for 30 Years. Marcos serves as their “bogeyman”, to scare people; he may come back to life; and become a Dictator again.

    The Aquinos’ did nothing good to the Philippines. They shelved the Land Reform Program; kept their Hacienda Luisita. They strengthened the Oligarchy, and continued Feudalism. The Aquinos are good in Patronage Politics; and demonizing their political enemies. You can see the Rabid Loyalties of their YellowTards.”Mga alaga ng bayan ang mga ito”… courtesy of your taxes; like Parasites, they live on our taxes…

    The Aquinos destroyed the good plans and programs of previous Presidents. However, they did not have good plans of their own, to put in place. They have large Egos; and Empty Heads.

    The Aquino era will be judged as the Worse Era in Philippine History. It will be an era of Greed and massive corruption.

    1. We studied Demings, Drucker, and Greene style of management and it was fun how we could control our people and to understand better as part of the workforce to operate like an oil well machine.

      Sun Tsu’s The Art of War and Miyamoto’s The Book of Five Rings also gave us inspirations on how to lose on purpose to gain something better, and to eventually win the internal conflict of our company.

      I wonder if PH politicians know of these priceless knowledge.

  2. There is good potential for this good source of energy, which is called: “Cold Fusion”…it is also called “neuclosynthesis”…it is the energy that give power to the stars and other elements. Nuclear Reactors, may soon become obsolete. We will advance from our Fossil Fuel civilization. If we go to this source of energy; all previous energy sources will become obsolete…

  3. Nice article. I really liked the part where you likened Filipino politicians (and the ones who voted them in) to impatient drivers. Indeed, I think that you could have driven this point further. Its how we as a people behave ourselves in the day-to-day that gives you an idea of where we as a people are going.

    Definitely, we’d have to stop thinking and acting like these Ford and Camry drivers if we want to get anywhere.

  4. All of what said by writer of this article is very true And all of us wondering what happened to us in the Philippines ..Why did we fall behind . How in the heck we were neglected by the investment community if the world , why did they choose Japan, South Korea . Why not the Philippines ???? I myself wondering why,,, what happened ??? I can only say this base on my expirience during my younger years when I was there, The Korean car manufacturer Hyundai is not even on the drawing board,,Philippines making jeepney,s, my family was one if the pioneers of them,, Francisco Motors was assembling car named Bellet if any body read this can remember the same time Japan Honda and Toyota are lemons of the world. What happened to Francisco Motors car Bellet. Beats me… It dis appears from the street , we were approach by Ford Motor Company and was ask to build a prototype jeepney for the Ford Fierra Tamaraw engine and chassis . And we did build two . And we were told that the jeepney style for Tamaraw did not accept by ford USA , but the ford Philippines build their own .The passenger type Tamaraw..someone in ford Philippines took that idea from that and we came out with no contract from ford ,,Hyundai doesn’t exist and Francisco motor is building Bellet , some one also took that contract from Francisco and he was left empty handed , why the technology was put in Hyundai in Korea and not in the Philippines is beyond me.. No support from the Philippine government to local manufacturers is it corruption ,,, yes I believed it is , my point here is the government doesn’t support any locals. They can be bought , they do not think of the Philippines having jobs,, they think about their own pockets first to sum it up.. If anybody’s car stop in the middle of the road .. Does any Filipino stops and ask if they needed some help .none,,, in America everybody stops and ask if you needed help.. Philippine is a self serving nation that only ask for pity by their actions but to much pride to ask for help… That’s is the mentality of Filipinos .

    1. It is sad, but very true…we cannot rely on anybody…we have to rely on ourselves. It is easier to make money , as a Politician, than to be an Entrepreneur. Our Politicians are the causes of all our problems…

  5. Whoever we vote is a gamble. So, base on visions, platforms, previous and present work served in the platter up to this point, I’m going to put my bet on BBM (if he will run for Pres or VP). I don’t like his mother and I don’t think I’ll ever trust his mother. Apart from the ill-gotten wealth, I think Imelda’s corruption is more on the incompetence and wasteful side. I can understand her wanting to collect precious gems and famous artworks. It’s wise to spend your money on things that rise in value as the time goes by. That is if she’s spending her own money or if she’s using excesses from the national budget or that is part of the national budget and anything she collected will be part of the nation’s assets. She did claim that what it’s all about, she even have Art Museum for it, apparently due to her incompetence, she ended up buying fakes and multiple times the amount of the sold pieces. Not to be bias, let me note that she was also surrounded by fake people and money-mongers. But first of all, she should have considered buying back our national treasures scattered around the world. Her collections by the way, when they get exiled to Hawaii, were left to the hands of the ones who take over. PCGG, after 30 years, did nothing profitable to the ill-gotten wealth they got back. Even if Imelda did say that in her last will and testament all the alleged ill-gotten wealth deposited outside the country will go the Filipino people and the rest of the world, I still don’t trust her. Not if she repents from her sins and not if they themselves, the Marcoses, make sure that their ill-gotten wealth, even the ones collected by the PCGG, will be spent to the Filipino people, every cent of it. Actually, I have hopes that Imelda will go to jail because aside from her incompetence, as to her wasteful side, to win favor from world leaders and richest of the world, she asserted her extravagance even if many Filipinos are under poverty back home. I understand her expensive shoe collection. That could also be a worldwide attraction. But that was bought during the time when there are still many Filipinos under poverty back home. If ever BBM did win, I’ll definitely be watchful of Imelda. Why in spite of being a Marcos and having a corrupt parent I’ll still vote for BBM? Because in this political gamble, BBM hold the best cards even if he also hold the worst card and his desire to win is because of what’s at stake. The nation’s welfare is at stake. The Filipinos welfare is at stake. But even if I’m saying that if he runs for President I’ll vote for him, I’ll still be cautious. Unless his running mate will be the likes of Duterte, Santiago, Gordon and Teodoro, who also hold the other best cards, there’s a risk that he will lose because someone will cheat on him or he’ll succumb to other big dirty bets. He must also present high standards on the people whom he will work with. Yes, I have high hopes he will run for higher office as well as the other capable ones left in our government. To move on, we must gamble with our best cards.

  6. Even though you may want to move forward in your life, you may have one foot on the brakes. In order to be free, we must learn how to let go. Release the hurt. Release the fear. Refuse to entertain your old pain. The energy it takes to hang onto the past is holding you back from a new life. What is it you would let go of today?

    You must make a decision that you are going to move on. It wont happen automatically. You will have to rise up and say, ‘I don’t care how hard this is, I don’t care how disappointed I am, I’m not going to let this get the best of me. I’m moving on with my life.

  7. Thank you very much for this. You know when you can’t pinpoint something but you just know it’s there? You can see what it’s doing but you can’t identify what it is. That is what I stop feeling when I read your articles (most of them). Dumb-struck at first, but quite happy afterwards.

    Thank you for putting words to things that most of us just would shrug off as “yung mga kwan…sa ano.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.