Bishops oppose opening in Manila of ‘Corpus Christi’, a play depicting Jesus Christ as gay

The latest outrage fad in the Philippines currently being stirred up by self-described champions of freedom and secularism is a campaign being mounted by the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) against the showing of the American stage play Corpus Christi in the Philippines.

Corpus Christi is a passion play by Terrence McNally dramatizing the story of Jesus and the Apostles. Written in 1997 and first staged in New York in 1998, it depicts Jesus and the Apostles as gay men living in modern-day Texas. It utilizes modern devices like television with anachronisms like Roman occupation. Judas betrays Jesus because of sexual jealousy. Jesus administers gay marriage between two apostles.

Playwright Terrence McNally, a gay man, received death threats when it was played in the U.S. Its production in New York City was canceled then reinstated, finally opening on 13 October 1998, directed by Joe Mantello. It received its British premiere in 2000, produced by Theatre 28 and directed by Stephen Henry. When it was produced as part of the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras, Anglican bishop Robert Forsyth considered the play to be offensive and historically incorrect.

A condensed version of the play was performed without incident in 2001 as part of a student directing class at St. Edward’s University in Austin, Texas. The play returned briefly to a small New York theatre in 2008, gaining a sympathetic review by the New York Times, which also published an article linking the uproar in 1998 to the death of gay student Matthew Shepard. In 2009, the play was performed at the Church of the Foothills in California.

The Sydney production of the play opened in 2008 as part of the Sydney Gay & Lesbian Mardi Gras in February of that year and reportedly also attracted indignation from various conservative groups in Australia including the country’s Anglican Church…

The Anglican Bishop of South Sydney, Robert Forsyth, questioned the integrity of Corpus Christi and expressed his outrage at the “unhistorical and untrue” depiction of the son of God and some of his disciples as homosexual.

“It is deliberately, not innocently, offensive and they’re obviously having a laugh about it,” he said.

“It’s historical nonsense and I wouldn’t want to go and see it. Life’s too short.”

prince_of_peace

Under the “freedoms” guaranteed by the Philippine Constitution, Jesus Christ himself is fair game for any kind of artistic interpretation in any medium, as much as any individual can exercise his or her freedom to experience the interpretation or not. So what’s the problem? In principle, there is none. Filipinos can easily shut the whole production down simply by not watching it just as a mass boycott of the products of even the biggest corporation can bring it to its knees.

The questions that comes to mind, however, are quite simple:

To the producers of shows like these: Out of a theoretically infinite creative space to explore, why this seeming need among so-called artists to use the Prince of Peace as a subject in a theatre production with a let’s-not-go-there premise? I mean, hey, depicting Jesus Christ as a gay person is just, well, too easy.

To those who play the “freedom of expression” card to put up Corpus Christi as yet another rallying issue against the Philippines’ Roman Catholic Taliban: Why give this Catholic crusade the time of day? Will Philippine society lose anything if deprived of the experience of seeing Jesus Christ depicted as a gay man?

And to the CBCP: What’s the big fuss? If you think your officers had done their job well, then you should rest easy, assured that your flock has enough spiritual tools to keep the faith in the face of the wealth of artistic content and information at their fingertips, as one does in a modern 21st Century society.

Me, personally, I think there are just too many things being sacrificed at the altar of the “gay” cause. I have nothing against gay people. I just think the whole idea that gay people are necessarily “victims” is getting old, specially when the community is emerging as an over-represented and increasingly noisy sector in the otherwise noble causes of freedom of expression, reproductive health, and secularism.

[NB: Parts of this article were lifted off Wikipedia.org and used in accordance with that site’s Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License consistent with the same license applied by Get Real Post to its content.]

print

Post Author: benign0

benign0 is the Webmaster of GetRealPhilippines.com.

Leave a Reply

14 Comments on "Bishops oppose opening in Manila of ‘Corpus Christi’, a play depicting Jesus Christ as gay"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Peace Walker
Guest

I don’t get the premise of this play…

Could someone explain to me, please?

johndoenymous@gmail.com
Guest
johndoenymous@gmail.com

I never get how CBCP and their followers should care about these things. If they don’t like it, don’t watch and tell their followers to not watch the thing. It’s not like Manila’s sacred ground that shouldn’t be touched by homosexuality.

On the opposite side, I understand that this is a reaction to the CBCP reaction but some of them are such low blows that they’re doing the same thing Catholic Talibans are doing, maybe even worst.

Baptized w/o My Consent
Guest
Baptized w/o My Consent

CBCP: “Do Not Watch! GOD wills it!” 😉

JiHyo
Guest

I’m gay and I love your last paragraph.

jack
Guest

This is nonsense. There is a stronger possibility that Jesus Christ never existed. Get real people. How many virgins do you know that have given birth? I also doubt that God existed. What proof is there of such an existence?

Baptized w/o My Consent
Guest
Baptized w/o My Consent

Oh jesus existed, my friend. But that’s where the truth ends.

jack
Guest

Jesus is a real as Santa Claus.

jack
Guest

Correction, Jesus is as real as Santa Claus.

Cinderella
Guest

I have known only one virgin had given birth in entire history. It’s Mary the wife of joseph, she give birth to Lord Jesus Christ. I think your not reading a Bible.
If you’ve doubt about God’s existence, why don’t you ask yourself. Where are you before God laid the foundation of the world?
Or else try to watch the sun goes down and wait til morning for the sunrise then you will see the proof that God exist.

jack
Guest

Cinderella did you meet Mary? I doubt you knew her. I also doubt that any of the nonsense contained in the bible is reality. There is a better chance that the bible is a fiction book.

Cinderella
Guest

of course I’ve meet Mary long time ago…
if you believe the bible is a fiction book, its up to you. But im sure what is written there it will judge you in the last day.

ChinoF
Member

Even though I’m a Christian, I wouldn’t mind letting that play get shown. It’s a way to see how others see my Savior – which of course, I’m likely to dismiss as mistaken. Only problem is, it can jiggle the sensibilities a bit. But hey, when The Last Temptation of Christ by Scorsese was shown, it didn’t have any world-shaking ramifications.

Paul Farol (@paulfarol)
Guest
Paul Farol (@paulfarol)

With all due respect to friends of mine who claim they are gay, I do notice that some vocal members of their community go at certain issues half-cocked.

philosopher
Guest
Our eyes are too small to see every truth there is…we should not deny the existence of a being just because we do not understand its nature..to do otherwise would only prove our ignorance.. The real issue here is not about God’s existence..it involves the interplay of constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms, I.e. freedom of expression and freedom of religion-not to offend one’s religious feelings. Both rights are not without limits. Their excercise should be made not just in accordance with law but also with respect to the morals and good customs of the place… We could debate all day as to whose… Read more »
wpDiscuz