Sotto’s plagiarism begets a blogging bill

Picture yourself as an average kid catching your younger sibling being a douche. You see him doing the typical mischief kids do in their worse days; throwing massive tantrums, stealing toys from other children, hitting people for no apparent reason, stuff like that. Being the good kid that you are, you beckon to your brother and give him a brief lecture on how wrong he was and why he should apologize for his mess-ups. But your brother happened to be spoiled.

He wails and cries and bawls, saying that it’s not his fault and you’re the one who’s being the douche instead. Your argument with your sibling reaches the ears of your dad. He rushes towards the scene and hushes your bratty brother.

“What happened?” your father asks, clearly alarmed.

“I saw him being rude to other people, so I scolded him,” you say, somewhat feeling proud of what you’ve done, but annoyed at your brother at the same time.

“Okay, I understand,” your father replies affectionately while caressing your brother’s head. “Now, to avoid fights like this in the future, let me enumerate the things you’re allowed to do so you won’t hurt your little brother again.”

“I—what!?” you blurt out in utter disbelief.

“Yeah, you’re right, dad,” your brother says, while giving you a mocking grin. “Tell him what he should do so he won’t hurt me again.”

Unless you’ve been indoctrinated with a radically different moral code, you’ll agree with me in saying that this just screams injustice all over. Your brother was being a prick, you stop him from being a prick, and then your dad imposes rules on you instead? It just doesn’t sit well with even our simplest perceptions of justice.

Unfortunately for our collective sense of justice, our own Senate President doesn’t seem to agree with it. In response to the tirade against Senator Vicente “Tito” Sotto III regarding his plagiarized speech against the Reproductive Health bill, Juan Ponce Enrile suggested that they enforce a law that will define what the Internet bloggers, who comprise the majority of Sotto’s critics, get to say.

According to Rappler:

From the RH bill to a blogging bill?

There was no apology from Senate Majority Floor Leader Vicente “Tito” Sotto III for plagiarizing the works of a blogger.

Instead, Sotto and Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile proposed crafting a bill that will define and regulate blogging in the Philippines.

(Source: Link)

Yes, straight from the short story above. Like your ridiculously unjust dad and bratty brother, Enrile and Sotto attempt to craft a bill that basically puts the blame on you instead for what Sotto had done. While Sotto shoots back at critics with a vast array of red herrings…

In his privilege speech, Sotto came out swinging against those who criticized him on Twitter, Facebook and newspapers. The comedian-turned-senator said his defense is the public’s knowledge of his life.

“Ang buhay ko open book …. Ang tanong, alam ba natin sino [ang mga kritiko ko]? Matino ba sila? Mabait ba sila? Lasenggo ba sila? Nananakit ba sila ng asawa? ‘Di natin alam sino sila pero ang gagaling manira,” Sotto said. (My life is an open book. The question is: do we know who my critics are? Are they proper? Are they good people? Are they drunkards? Do they hurt their spouses? We don’t know them but they are so good in criticizing.)

Sotto also bristled at critics’ jab at his involvement as a host of the noontime show Eat Bulaga.

“Ang Eat Bulaga, daan-daan ang tinutulungan noon araw-araw. Libu-libo ang tumatangkilik. Itong mga tumutuligsa at namimintas sa atin, ilan na kaya ang natulungan na nila, kung meron man?” (Eat Bulaga helps hundreds of people everyday. Thousands watch it. Those criticizing me, how many have they helped, if any?)

Enrile stepped into the fray, inquired on what a blog is in the first place, came up with a brilliant idea and suggested to have blogs regulated.

The Senate President said, “Magpanukala tayo ng batas at ilagay natin doon kung ano ang mga karapatan ng mga may blogs para sa ganoon ay maliwanag.” (Let us make a law and let us put there the rights of those with blogs so it’s clear.)

In the midst of these amusingly irritating events, I must express my confusion; why do things have to turn out this way? Why is there a need for Sotto to put up a flimsy defense against his mishap, dragging Enrile into the mess in the process, endangering both of their reputations in the eyes of the public, when he could’ve just solved all of this in one simple action: saying sorry?

“I apologize for my failure to give credit where credit is due. I shall see to it that this will not happen again, and that I shall be more vigilant with the words I impart to the Filipino people.”

It gives you an air of humility, it gives you grace, and it solves pretty much everything in one fell swoop. I mean, after all, what the critics basically want is for Sotto to acknowledge that he plagiarized someone else’s work. Being a plagiarizer is a professional disgrace, which is utterly unbecoming of a public official like Sotto. The least he could do was to simply bow his head down and admit his mistakes. All will be eventually forgotten, and he can go back to being a bona fide champion of the so-called pro-life advocates.

But Sotto just had to attract more negative attention to himself by not admitting his wrongs in broad daylight. But the worst joke of all was for Enrile to side with Sotto while opening the threat to freedom of speech to bloggers everywhere. Agents of justice being unjust… how ironic.

Perhaps it could be machismo. Seriously, how could a man like Sotto yield to an unknown, not to mention female blogger? How could a senator bow down to a mere private citizen fighting for what is right in the face of professional and intellectual aggravation? Where’s the pride in that?

Or Sotto might be thinking that in being hard-headed, he might get the people’s favor for his unswerving principles. Although, observing the things that have happened, I’ve yet to see where the principles are hiding.

Or Sotto just doesn’t know how to act smart in public.

Well? What’s the next attraction in our political circus, Senator Sotto?

[Photo courtesy TodoEntertainment.com.]

print

About Arche

I'm just throwing ideas around. I also love coffee.

Post Author: Arche

I'm just throwing ideas around. I also love coffee.

Leave a Reply

75 Comments on "Sotto’s plagiarism begets a blogging bill"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Gogs
Member

He is playing to his constituents who have no use for blogs since they don’t read. See earlier GRP blog on who Senator Sotto represents .

ka_fredo
Guest

There’s another angle. They are going to drag this out to delay the processing of the RHbill.

Belle Luna
Guest

Don’t try to rationalize and analyze and understand what might be going through their minds! I know that you want to be able to come up with a rational explanation for their thought patterns, but honestly, just give up. No matter how low you try to reach, no matter how far you try to bend down low– you will not be able to reach that low low low level of human thought pattern! It will never be explained!

jeanne
Guest
About the blogging bill – I don’t know what kind of smoke the senators are smoking. If the US cannot control the Internet with the SOPA bill, how does the Philippines can? ( in serious LOL). Bloggers (I assume) only know one right – that’s freedom of expression which is exercised every day. These two old-timers need to catch up fast or they will be really so outdated! Or Sotto just doesn’t know how to act smart in public. You hit the nail in the head. Hey Arche, you just gave my first real serious laugh of the day.
BenK
Editor

Rappler’s hysteria has been(once again) apparently discredited:
http://pinoy-buzz.com/2012/08/30/did-you-bite-rapplers-spin-on-the-so-called-blogging-bill/

fishball
Guest

Unahin nyo muna si Gloria, kasing kapal na ng mukha nya ang patung patong na mga pagnanakaw nya

fishball
Guest

Kasalanan ni Gloria to kaya nagkakagulo ang lipunan natin eh. Mantakin mo, naging presidente ka na nga bumalik ka pa sa kongreso? At kontra pa sa RH bill, hindi na lang sumunod sa tuwid na daan. Dapat ikulong na yan sa regular na selda.

Der Fuhrer
Guest

fishball is just validating the the tyrant mindset of the current dictatorship. Black propaganda continues to spout against GMA. The lady congressman is therefore Guilty and should be placed in a regular jail before trial.

The clincher is apparent when the little tyrant apprentice stated that we all need to be isolated in a reeducation camp. Makes me wonder if the Baron Butchokoy video showing the yellow rehas and the commie guards scenario will really happen. fishball you are really asking for it.

tonybac
Guest

Seems like fishball is on the warpath today.

Hyden Toro
Guest

Sotto wants to muzzle his critics. He wants people not to criticize him, for being a plagiarist. Hyperspace cannot be regulated. Same way, you cannot stop YellowTard Hackers, from Hacking PCOS, or peoples’ computers…

Lasavoy
Guest

The only way this could work is by registering your Blog to the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines. if you’re not registered, your blog can be used by anyone without citing their source. That’s the only way that this can be done in bounds to democracy. Sotto can slip this one cause the hounds at the Senate backs him up. Why don’t people focus on his fake Diane production year claim instead?

thekatling
Guest

I read somewhere, I think it was the website of ABS-CBN, that he is threatening his critics once the Cybercrime Bill has pass. Funny though, they have a different take with this bill than the Cybercrime Law in the US. According to Sen. Sotto, the bill will deal with critics who says bad things about the government..

Wow! I think the Senator needs to check what does a critic.. tsk tsk.

Felipe
Guest

Interesting how politicians make us believe that democracy is being “restored” in our country, whilst political control over our basic rights or freedoms are starting to resemble countries we claim to dislike such as China—We are going towards the direction of N Korea or China, instead of that of “enlightened” societies. It’s bad enough that greed and the ambition of the few have dismantled and corrupted the true meaning of separation of powers. Now control over the various media are being extended to blogs which used to be havens of free thought and speech/writing.

jepoy
Guest

i think fishball is not real he is only planted in this site to bring out your anger over the yellow zombies

Lord Chimera
Guest

This proposed blogging bill has the smell of media control all over it and for what telling the truth about something? But then again no one enjoys being told that they are idiots especially idiots.

Lord Chimera
Guest

And also may I ask, HOW IN THE NAME OF ALL THINGS SEEN AND UNSEEN IS GMA RELATED TO THIS!?…..or is fishball having a his period?

jona-s
Guest

I hope in the near future we SCRAP the stupidity that is the 1987 constitution and favor a form of governance that ACTUALLY favors efficient leaders.

At least Gloria is a better stateswoman… – Daido Katsumi

If we can have a ‘better stateswoman’ like Gloria Arroyo to rule over us under our present constitution why do we have to scrap it?

I don’t understand.

Lord Chimera
Guest
Taken from today’s Manila Standard: “Ako yata ang kauna-unahang senador ng Pilipinas na naging biktima ng cyber-bullying. Mula sa blogs, Facebook, at Twitter, ginawa akong sentro ng mga mapanira at malisyosong atake ng iba’t ibang tao, lalo pa ng mga sumusuporta sa RH Bill (Maybe I am the first Philippine senator to become victim of cyberbullying. From blogs to Facebook to Twitter, I became the center of derision and malicious attacks especially from supporters of RH Bill).” Dear Senator if you just admitted to the fact or at least conceded that your speech was lifted from another person’s work without… Read more »
Der Fuhrer
Guest

Manong Johnny… Hindi na kami happy.

Are all senators like Tito onion skinned? Is Tito above question and criticism in a free democracy?

Please make us happy again. Do not use democracy against democracy by trying to muzzle legitimate dissent, press freedom and freedom to express opinions no matter how painful it may be.

You have no right to regulate or suppress the internet blogs for the express purpose of controlling them.

Happy kami sa kalayaan! Ayaw namin ng bulok na diktadura na gusto ng magaling na boss mo.