The folly of economic dependence on foreign employment

Which does more damage to a child during his/her formative years, the lack of cash or the non-presence of one or even both parents because he/she or they are working overseas? Every example of the humblest of Filipinos being able to extricate themselves from poverty by sheer hard work and discipline within our islands highlights the folly and destructiveness of our easy-way-out approach to national development by lionising OFWs as “heroes”. Let’s not forget that the ancestors of most Filipino Chinese were third class citizens when they first came yet managed to make a life for themselves in the same dysfunctional environment.

Sure. Going off to a foreign land to earn cash to provide for one’s family back home is what any “responsible parent” would do.

Or is it?

Where and when exactly does “responsible parenting” start? Does it start when one already has four kids to feed, clothe, and educate? Or does it start when one first considers having them? It seems Filipinos have forgotten or choose to ignore the latter aspect of being a “responsible parent”.

Having children, then suddenly finding ourselves unable to provide for them is irresponsible. Seeking foreign employment at the expense of sound parenting and labeling it as heroism white-washes this collective irresponsibility and further adds to the counts of this irresponsibility.

It is irresponsible for one to produce offspring without considering one’s long-term ability to provide for them materially as well as emotionally and spiritually. Foreign employment and abortion are sometimes the results of this lack of planning. Leaving one’s young children to seek employment overseas is different from abortion in only one aspect: with abortion, the social problem ends right there and then; with foreign employment involving young children, the problems just begin. OFWs who “sacrifice” family life and the people who lionise them as “heroes” forget that these absentee-parents are turning loose unto an already dysfunctional society a whole generation of absentee-parented youth. Their “sacrifice” is our society’s sacrifice as well in terms of the burden of absorbing this absentee-parented generation. The absentee-parented generation will be no improvement over a generation that already failed dismally at collectively building a strong state.

Foreign employment should therefore be treated as the temporary solution that it is and should not be institutionalised as a key economic activity. Our dependence on foreign employment should be put in its proper perspective in the context of the following principles:

(1) Parents are responsible for the physical, intellectual, and emotional health of their children. This responsibility can be fully fulfilled only by said parents’ being present during their children’s formative years.

(2) Every child not raised optimally presents itself as a cost to society in varying degrees (depending on the extent of its parent/s shortfall in fulfilling their parental responsibilities). The cost may range from, say, wasted public education funds all the way to law enforcement costs resulting from the criminal activities of the truly damaged ones.

(3) OFWs with young children living in the Philippines are not present during their children’s formative years and are less likely to fulfill their responsibilities as parents beyond provision of material needs.

(4) Responsible parenting begins with ensuring one’s capability to assume full long-term responsibility for raising children hands-on before one actually has them.

(5) Parents of young children seeking employment overseas can be considered to be remiss in their parental responsibilities, particularly in the aspect described in Item 4.


[Photo courtesy Exiled Blogger.]

Therefore, revisiting the opening statement of this article our society therefore needs to evaluate the situation of dependence on foreign employment that it is in by considering these questions:

  • Is the cost to society of less-than-optimal parenting compensated by the financial rewards of foreign employment?
  • Are the financial fruits of foreign employment channeled to sustainable domestic enterprise to fund the long-term social costs of said foreign employment? (Or are these financial fruits sucked in by consumerism that does not contribute to the expansion of the capital base of the domestic economy?)
  • Does the social cost of absentee-parentism include a resulting collective character in the new generation of Filipinos that is not an improvement on the collective character of our generation and is therefore not compatible with the long-term goals of our efforts to build a strong state?

The nineties had demonstrated that Filipinos are good at attracting wealth but poor at employing it productively much less retaining it domestically. The wealth generated by foreign employment is not immune to this reality about us. Irresponsible export of labour has more far-reaching consequences than the go-go speculative inflows of capital in the 90’s the drying up of which impacted mainly the middle and upper classes of Philippine society. The fruits of foreign employment are just as fleeting as 1990’s speculative capital inflow but its social costs to all Filipinos are long-term.

[Photo of beggar child courtesy Grey Matter.]

print

Post Author: benign0

benign0 is the Webmaster of GetRealPhilippines.com.

Leave a Reply

15 Comments on "The folly of economic dependence on foreign employment"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Hugh
Guest
Might also be the result of relying too much on extended family to take care of the kids, which in turn raises the financial cost of their upkeep, what with the “utang na loob” thing. It’s quite ok that grandparents are taking care of the kids while the parents are away, but when the grandparents have to do the parenting all over again, then that is just plain retarded. There is no guarantee of transmission of values as the grandparents get older, and given the widening culture gap as well, the children would need more than just the latest-issue gadget… Read more »
Gogs
Member

Well at least I learned something that is true. It’s More Fun In the Philippines. It’s more fun because there is less work.

BlueStreak
Guest

Point taken, I do appreciate the article on how it puts on the issues the benefits of foreign employment vs. the effects to child that lacked “proper parenting”.

curl
Guest
My dad was an OFW for almost 25 years, who tried to provide for 3 children. We grew up just fine with the help of my mother and some relatives. I would say we developed normally and if not better than others. We learned to appreciate our dad as the provider, and always were grateful for the sacrifices of our parents. With the help of technology now, constant communication is possible. I know it’s not the ideal family but we learn to cope with changes when needed. I know a lot of families who are also together, but still live… Read more »
Hiraya
Guest
My parents were OFWs for almost 25 years, we grew up with our aunties and we have a good relationship with them but not with our parents. Of course I understand their reason of working abroad but sometimes we just can’t help but blame their absence why our family is almost broken. We all now live together here in another country after 25 years of no family picture. It’s harder now especially for that 25 years of their hard work the money they earned was only for the payment of their loans, our expenses for immigration, relatives who rely on… Read more »
Kenny1027
Guest
The thing is an irresponsible parent is an irresponsible parent. I find this article very offensive to OFWs. ok nandyan na ang mga anak and the problem of raising them, at least OFWs are doing something to provide for their children. They work hoping that their children dont have to go through the things they went through. Sure you can stay and work your ass off in the country, earn hardly enough, and worst case the children have to stop with their studies. what kind of future will they have without proper education? isnt that even more irresponsible? working abroad… Read more »
BenK
Editor
You seem to be assuming irresponsibility is necessarily willful, and I don’t think that’s an argument anyone can support. Take a look at those consecutive comments by curl and Hiraya above yours — neither one of those sets of parents seems to have been intentionally irresponsible, yet there are two very different stories there. The point of the article is that it is irresponsible to take on a commitment you can’t guarantee you can honor. Does anyone think it through first? Do they ask themselves, “Do I have material and mental resources enough that I can properly house, feed, educate,… Read more »
Hugh
Guest

Might just actually apply to the rest of the jejemon crowd, that responsible parenting thing. I keep wondering why squalid slums are teeming with crowds of children alongside gin-toting drunks, and obversely, fewer children in middle-class neighborhoods where no alcohol or smokes are sold to minors.

You’d sooner and easier find a 36-year old grandmother in the slums than a 40-year old virgin.

jaks
Guest

townhouses in exclusive villages are turned into shabu labs (read the news) and you worry about smokes sold to minors in slums. checkmate.

lovely guico
Guest
I got the message of the post and so the comments in this topic, But what I would like to point out now is that let’s just face the fact that no one in this world is perfect, no perfect parent, child, lifestyle attitude etc. but I must admit that really planning before you go with something is more idealistic rather than going in a war without a gun. But anyhow, In my own opinion of how the post has been delivered is a bit harsh for the OFWs. This is my only point with this post, we as a… Read more »
jaks
Guest

heartwarming stories but anecdotal. its just a fact that kids are better off if the parents are there.

Nikki Cortes
Guest
Listen, in everything there are good and bad points. Yes, true, it is very irresponsible for a couple to have kids and not being able to raise and nurture them properly – exactly what you said. However, if do not have enough education, or lack of it, and cannot get employment locally, you resort to working abroad – basically, to support your family, your children. That is always the MAIN reason. But then, women/men, especially mothers tried try their best to find a relative to care for them. It is not like you leave the kids on the streets. However,… Read more »
Drich
Guest

I bet those kids would choose having their parents go away than go hungry any day. I’m friends with a number of these children of OFW parents, and they grew up just fine.

trackback

[…] ado agree that OFWism is a problem and I do support solutions for bringing back OFWs and having them stay home permanently. But one […]

Dirch
Guest

For me, the answer to the first question is lack of money does more damage to a child, those kids in the picture sniffing glue? they have their parents, they just happen to be jobless. But I get your point. The fact that the government think more OFWs is a good thing sucks and it does not help our country in the long run. Problems like these are not really unsolvable, there’s just people in the government who want to keep it this way.

wpDiscuz